182:
of the arguments posed by two of the editors in favor of keeping
Strickland is that all major party candidates for U.S. Congress should be considered automatically notable, regardless of other notability criteria. If Strickland has other item of notability, then that's applicable in his debate, but
157:
Again: This cannot be compared to the Roy C. Strickland article. There is not too much here. The Roy
Strickland article is concise, thorough, and very well-written. There is no comparison. Strickland ran for office in two states. He was a pioneer of the LA GOP. No comparison, as I see it. In
144:
119:
191:
argument gains traction and indeed seems to be a consensus among editors, then that sentiment does directly affect this one. I've started a new topic on the
211:
The problem with this article is sourcing, but there is no doubt that multiple reliable non-trivial sources exist for the runner-up in a major election.
228:
161:
If one checks the articles considered for deletion, virtually NONE of them comes anywhere near to the standards in the Roy
Strickland article.
235:
192:
92:
87:
96:
79:
17:
278:
36:
277:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
263:
242:
215:
199:
167:
151:
130:
61:
223:. The nominators argument for deletion is based in "inherent non-notability", which is not supported by
250:. Probably won't matter in ten years, but Black Falcon and Dhaluza are correct that sources do exist.--
83:
55:
257:
164:
239:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
127:
75:
67:
50:
252:
224:
143:
standards, though I guess pending what editors decide about certain arguments in the
140:
212:
178:. You've misunderstood me. I'm not saying the articles are directly comparable.
113:
196:
148:
126:
Losing political candidate does not meet the standards for notability.
271:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
183:
it's beside the point that I'm addressing here. The point
158:
addition, Strickland has an impressive business career.
109:
105:
101:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
281:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
227:. For sources, please see the following
195:to solicit input there on the issue.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
298:
264:02:01, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
243:23:10, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
238:for "Doug Roulstone". --
216:10:20, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
200:06:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
168:01:14, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
152:23:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
131:22:41, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
62:18:57, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
274:Please do not modify it.
145:Roy C. Strickland debate
32:Please do not modify it.
236:198 other news results
193:talk page of WP:BIO
289:
276:
262:
187:is that if that
117:
99:
60:
34:
297:
296:
292:
291:
290:
288:
287:
286:
285:
279:deletion review
272:
251:
90:
74:
71:
49:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
295:
293:
284:
283:
267:
266:
245:
218:
205:
204:
203:
202:
155:
154:
139:under current
124:
123:
76:Doug Roulstone
70:
68:Doug Roulstone
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
294:
282:
280:
275:
269:
268:
265:
261:
259:
254:
249:
246:
244:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:Seattle Times
226:
222:
219:
217:
214:
210:
207:
206:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
181:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
166:
165:Billy Hathorn
162:
159:
153:
150:
146:
142:
138:
135:
134:
133:
132:
129:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
54:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
273:
270:
255:
247:
240:Black Falcon
230:
220:
208:
188:
184:
179:
175:
163:
160:
156:
136:
125:
56:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
229:article in
253:Kubigula
189:specific
120:View log
213:Dhaluza
176:Comment
93:protect
88:history
225:WP:BIO
197:Mwelch
149:Mwelch
141:WP:BIO
137:Delete
97:delete
57:scribe
128:JakeZ
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
258:talk
248:Keep
234:and
221:Keep
209:Keep
185:here
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
46:keep
180:One
147:.
118:– (
52:WjB
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
48:.
260:)
256:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.