201:
Promotional article for non-notable surgeon. Despite all the emphasis on his work, the citations for his most cited papers are 70, 56, 42,11,4 ,which is not notable in medicine. His claimed book is not in WorldCat--it appears to be some sort of review book for use in training. His appearances on
233:
is our policy, I want to be sure that we are examining the question of "significant, third-party coverage independent of the subject." If all his work in just in his local region, then I'd agree that deletion is appropriate, but the
170:
342:- I see him as notable for his breast cancer awareness raising. No comment on his notability beyond this, as plastic surgeons often have references that are throw-away due to the way they're described in the media.
52:. DGG makes a good argument regarding the published papers and available citation numbers. The breast cancer awareness work is laudatory, but the sources supporting his media profile are too thin to meet the
255:
123:
164:
275:
295:
205:
The references are promotional interviews, and ref 1 isa good example. WP is not for the purpose of adding to his quite thorough efforts at self-promotion. '
56:
requirements. No prejudice against recreation if he further lifts his profile and can establish significant coverage for it, but at present this isn't there.
130:
96:
91:
100:
83:
17:
185:
152:
382:
355:
317:
433:
146:
40:
414:
401:
373:
346:
332:
307:
287:
267:
246:
216:
65:
142:
87:
192:
283:
263:
79:
71:
429:
328:
36:
244:
178:
158:
225:: Seems what we have here is a celebrity doctor situation. Thus the appropriate standard is just
279:
259:
61:
230:
303:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
428:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
239:
226:
365:
212:
57:
408:
395:
299:
117:
207:
202:
various media are his self-advertising, as is customary in the field.
422:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
385:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
358:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
320:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
256:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
364:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
177:
406:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
326:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
436:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:list of California-related deletion discussions
296:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
238:appearance may lift it up a bit. Undecided.
8:
294:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
254:Note: This debate has been included in the
293:
273:
253:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
229:, not medicine. While I agree that
24:
1:
415:12:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
402:12:30, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
374:02:06, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
347:07:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
66:11:12, 29 August 2016 (UTC)
453:
333:00:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
308:00:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
288:13:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
268:13:01, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
247:20:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
217:16:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
425:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Douglas Glynn Bolitho
72:Douglas Glynn Bolitho
391:Relisting comment:
417:
376:
335:
310:
290:
270:
236:Discovery Channel
444:
427:
411:
405:
398:
388:
386:
370:
363:
361:
359:
345:
331:
325:
323:
321:
242:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
443:
442:
441:
440:
434:deletion review
423:
418:
409:
396:
381:
379:
377:
368:
354:
352:
343:
336:
327:
316:
314:
240:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
450:
448:
439:
438:
404:
393:Final relist.
389:
378:
362:
351:
350:
349:
324:
313:
312:
311:
291:
271:
250:
249:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
449:
437:
435:
431:
426:
420:
419:
416:
413:
412:
403:
400:
399:
392:
387:
384:
375:
372:
371:
360:
357:
348:
341:
338:
337:
334:
330:
329:North America
322:
319:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
285:
281:
280:Coolabahapple
277:
272:
269:
265:
261:
260:Coolabahapple
257:
252:
251:
248:
245:
243:
237:
232:
228:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
214:
210:
209:
203:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
424:
421:
407:
394:
390:
380:
366:
353:
344:Jeremy112233
339:
315:
235:
222:
206:
204:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
430:talk page
300:• Gene93k
241:Montanabw
37:talk page
432:or in a
383:Relisted
356:Relisted
318:Relisted
231:WP:NOADS
124:View log
58:Euryalus
39:or in a
410:MBisanz
397:MBisanz
223:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
143:Google
101:delete
54:WP:GNG
50:delete
213:talk
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
369:2007
367:Dane
340:Keep
304:talk
284:talk
264:talk
227:WP:N
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
208:DGG
193:TWL
122:– (
306:)
298:.
286:)
278:.
266:)
258:.
215:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
302:(
282:(
262:(
211:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.