247:
even within Austin, Texas, much less outside of it. As noted, neighborhoods and subdivisions are not inherently notable, nor are individual parks or large high-rise apartment buildings. Almost anything can be an identifying marker; more often, it's a street name. While there is no bar to referring
183:
I don't agree with the assessment of the nominator that the place is non-notable. We don't have enough information in the article to make a reliable assessment about that. The other neighboorhoods in the category
Nuclear mentions have actual content (the ones I checked). I vote to delete because this
206:
page from Austin parks and rec, and real estate listings that recognize the Dove
Springs location as an identifying marker, I'm inclined to say that presumption should stand here; Dove Springs strikes me as a viable search term that a random Knowledge (XXG) user might search for to find objective
224:
Although being used in real estate ads has normally not been sufficient--such ads use almost any possible neighborhood term available--the wording on the City page linked to just above "to provide citizens of the Dove
Springs community... " might be sufficient.
322:
place appears to be notable enough, a search of Google Books and Google News finds some results that could be useful for expanding the article. If there is not much that can be written about it, this and other stubs in the category could be merged into
155:
should be either deleted with the article, as there are thousands or more articles like it (who wants to go through them?) or kept. I'm not advocating either one, but I'm just saying that dozens of other such articles exist.
303:
I've got some healthy skepticism toward this page because it doesn't cite a source for many of the stats, but Dove
Springs certainly seems to have some distinctive characteristics.
127:
283:
245:
94:
89:
98:
202:
suggests that neighborhoods may receive a (rebuttable) presumption of notability if the neighborhood's name is widely known / in widespread usage. Based on
81:
17:
184:
article has no significant content that cannot be gleaned from a map (which is also a common reason used to delete road articles) -
248:
to them in the context of other articles, individual neighborhoods do not entitled to their own separate page on
Knowledge (XXG).
85:
333:
312:
295:
274:
257:
236:
216:
191:
175:
141:
63:
148:
324:
49:
348:
36:
77:
69:
58:
347:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
291:
166:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
189:
282:
USGS doesn't list the existence of this neighborhood, although it does appear to have a
Methodist church
199:
270:
53:
300:
328:
301:
The neighborhood tends to get more negative mentions than positive ones, as this page demonstrates.
287:
253:
157:
308:
212:
185:
286:, which seems to have been found by the USGS in the yellow pages under "churches". Not enough.
138:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
249:
152:
327:, to make the list useful as it currently has no more information than the category. —
304:
232:
208:
203:
135:
115:
227:
341:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
122:
111:
107:
103:
244:
The neighborhood itself does not appear to be notable
48:. Sufficient sources for valid settlement. A merge to
151:, so I'm just going to mention this. By this logic,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
351:). No further edits should be made to this page.
52:can be discussed on the relevant talk pages.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
134:Non-notable subdivision in Austin
24:
1:
334:23:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
207:information about the place.
64:16:23, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
325:List of Austin neighborhoods
313:21:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
296:21:20, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
275:02:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
258:17:57, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
237:17:33, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
217:17:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
192:17:23, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
176:15:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
142:15:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
50:List of Austin neighborhoods
78:Dove Springs, Austin, Texas
70:Dove Springs, Austin, Texas
368:
344:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
149:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
44:The result was
62:
359:
346:
331:
169:
160:
125:
119:
101:
56:
34:
367:
366:
362:
361:
360:
358:
357:
356:
355:
349:deletion review
342:
329:
172:
167:
158:
121:
92:
76:
73:
54:Espresso Addict
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
365:
363:
354:
353:
337:
336:
317:
316:
315:
288:Carlossuarez46
277:
260:
239:
219:
194:
178:
164:
159:NuclearWarfare
132:
131:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
364:
352:
350:
345:
339:
338:
335:
332:
326:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
276:
272:
268:
265:- per above.
264:
261:
259:
255:
251:
246:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
229:
223:
220:
218:
214:
210:
205:
201:
198:
195:
193:
190:
187:
182:
179:
177:
174:
173:
170:
161:
154:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
137:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
343:
340:
319:
279:
262:
241:
226:
221:
196:
180:
163:
162:
133:
45:
43:
31:
28:
200:WP:OUTCOMES
267:Hogvillian
147:I know of
330:Snigbrook
263:Weak Keep
250:Mandsford
222:Weak Keep
197:Weak Keep
305:Townlake
209:Townlake
128:View log
136:Nv8200p
95:protect
90:history
280:Delete
242:Delete
181:Delete
123:delete
99:delete
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
320:Keep
309:talk
292:talk
284:here
271:talk
254:talk
233:talk
213:talk
204:this
168:Talk
153:this
139:talk
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
59:talk
46:Keep
228:DGG
186:Mgm
311:)
294:)
273:)
256:)
235:)
215:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
307:(
290:(
269:(
252:(
231:(
211:(
188:|
171:)
165:(
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
61:)
57:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.