4123:. How many of these have articles? Clearly, being an altcoin does not establish notability. So what ELSE do we have? We have BuzzFeed articles. Let's go to BuzzFeed and look up some other reliable sources of information. Let's read some of these neutral, unbiased articles written only about notable subjects suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), like "Harry Potter Emojis Are What Your Phone Needs Immediately", "21 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Smoke Weed On Christmas", "23 Signs Youâre Obsessed With Taking Pictures", "14 TV Episode Descriptions That Are Shockingly Bad". Oh man. I bet there's a lot of fact-checking in "28 Everyday Decisions That College Students Are Terrible At Making". I'm going to cite that in my thesis. I'm not saying its inclusion is totally without merit, but it doesn't deserve its own separate article when almost no other marginal cryptocurrency does, and the only difference between it and them is the fact that it's regularly featured in "Wacky Internet Meme News" articles. Does anyone have any recollection of
3225:(the Italian version, but still) just released an article about the currency. That has been the seventh publication since this deletion nomination started, and likely the biggest one. There seems to be a trend with foreign sources coming out in addition to English ones, but I believe that these big-name sources of information are only hammering the nail on the coffin harder on whatever argument for deletion the nominator had. I also believe that even if the article somehow still got deleted, it would be recreated back very quickly just judging from how much has come in the last few days.
4301:- Late to the discussion, but looking at the subject itself without considering any of the accusations and possible COI going on, I think there's been significant enough coverage from the various reliable sources posted above. In response to claims that Dogecoin is a temporary fad or is bound to fail, whether or not Dogecoin ends up being successful is fairly irrelevant regarding its notability and significance. The present-day notability is enough to warrant recording here.
2313:, since it looks identical to existing coins besides the "Doge" branding. As an aside, I'm confused by the COI accusations of the nominator. The screenshot of his forum comment is hardly damning: in it, he talks about his deletion request getting overrun by meatpuppets. How is that evidence of trolling? I don't see what anyone stands to gain from this article getting deleted, but based on the meatpuppetry going on here I'd say the accusers might be
2843:
coincidence and misunderstanding, but at the same time not entirely unsuspicious. It's obviously controversial, but this group has had similar dealings with processes on
Knowledge (XXG), making it perfectly reasonable to be skeptical of if you submitted this nomination in good-faith and waiting for a proper verdict, or if supposed political reasons are leading you to try and sway concensus towards your way.
113:
3906:- Though Dogecoin may be based on a meme, that doesn't change the fact that it has been getting lots attention from news sites and internet users. Even though the article view count does not factor into the argument of keeping the article, you can see that Dogecoin is also very popular on other sites. On Reddit, for example, the Dogecoin tip bot is currently much more popular than the Bitcoin tip bot (
1638:. They will be reviewed for reliability by third parties. This deletion discussion need not even be mentioned, so they could be totally impartial. If they are found to be reliable, Atomicthumbs' rationale for deletion will be demolished. Personally, I 1) own no dogecoins (or any other fake money), and never plan to, 2) was not asked to come here and am not a meatpuppet (thanks for
1291:- The subject is definitely notable, as Dogecoin is the 4th most mined scrypt based currency and this rate is increasing quickly. The sources seem to be reliable to me. Can we have some explanation as to why the sources given above are not considered "reliable sources"? They appear to meet at least some of the Knowledge (XXG) definition of a reliable source.
410:
google can be some sort of assessment of how notable a term is. If you search for "dogecoin" you get 119.000 results. If you search for another cryptocurrency like "peercoin" which has a wikipedia article you get 164.000 results. That's not a very large difference. And
Peercoin has been out since 12 August 2012, while dogecoin was released December 6th, 2013..
3529:
with much force now because of the massive upsurge of brand-new sources listed above. Now, the
Business Insider article and a couple of others could be used to help cite more of the technical explanations of the coin, it's founding and establishment by online communities such as 4chan and Reddit, OR even both. I agree, that this likely did not meet
3869:, even though Dogecoin really does meet the criteria anyway. Plus, because we have two large keep factions (one of those being an assload of meatpuppets), meaning that it's more likely this will end the natural way. Still, even without the meatpuppets, the article has a better chance than it did at the start of the discussion.
2035:
It is clear that the nominator was acting in bad faith in an attempt in inject his ideology, as SRS has attempted to do in the past. Whether AT is a member of SRS is to be seen, but there is, in my opinion, no doubt that he was not trying to delete this for the good of
Knowledge (XXG), but rather for personal reasons.
1228:
On top of the COI thanks to reddit comments, perhaps
Atomicthumb would like to explain why up until July of 2012 he was a member of the "Wikipedians against notability", which openly states that deletions based on notability harm wikipedia? His argument here goes directly inverse to the morals of the
1107:
if he happens to remove his previous comments. Seeing as how this new information has come to light, I recommend the proposal be denied. The article stays. personal views do not give you the right to delete a wikipedia entry, I might dislike Hitler but it does not give me the right to delete Hitler's
932:
Tell me more about how the dollar value of a web site determines its reliability, its commitment to fact-checking, and its lack of bias? Snapchat was valued at $ 3 billion, so if I send you a picture of myself flipping off this article with a little speech bubble that says "totally non-notable!" will
3528:
arguments only arose trying to cancel out the meatpuppetry by either blindly stating all the sources were blogs or arguing deletion only because "ewww memes, go back to 4chan, Reddit, etc". The only real arguments for deletion (let's use InShaneee and
SagaciousPhil as an example) really don't strike
3501:
arguments are based upon the assumption of a future success; now, as this coin is not even a month old, such an assumption seems to be somewhat farfetched. There is also a clear lack of secondary sources that could provide some understanding of the subject beyond the obvious buzz and excitement: the
3246:
One I forgot to mention earlier was this one by
Vyralize, only because I got tired of looking at pictures of a cute, yellow Japanese dog making a funny facial expression. At this point, I'm starting to get tired of finding more reliable sources, and I'm having thoughts that I might be overdoing this
2372:
I believe you're referring to my post. SRS is a social justice group who have not shied away from trying to censor
Knowledge (XXG) in the past, if an article doesn't approve of their philosophies. That the group leans towards Marxism is actually relevant since they reject all cryptocurrencies due to
2034:
On the subject of the COI, nominator is in clear COI. /r/shibe is an SRS-affiliated subreddit, and SRS (radical feminist social-justice group, with a penchant towards marxism) has voiced strong opposition to cryptocurrencies in the past. There may be political ties that have not been seen until now.
1316:
I have already explained on this page why the sources are not notable. In addition, the mining rate of the cryptocurrency does also not constitute notability, which has a specific definition on
Knowledge (XXG). If I created, say, Cosbycoin, a scrypt currency with a very low and unchanging difficulty
1259:
What "agenda"? Can you explain what ancient conspiracy is being advanced by the deletion of this article? One one hand, the nominator's posts are in no way indicative of a "vendetta" beyond a wish to have an article deleted. On the other hand, they have nothing to do with the deletion anyway. Please
409:
This is probably the strongest argument against the doge wikipedia article as of yet. But there are already articles written about in on large websites such as heavy.com and dailydot.com. Judging how notable a subject like this is can be hard, but let's assume for a second that the amount of hits on
4377:
really looks fine to me. What's the worst thing that will happen if the article is kept? Outside sources do exist, both relibale and not reliable. We don't live in the past; just because it supposedly was not notable at thew time of the AFD is not relevant I also suggest to the nominator that this
2784:
I do believe that the nominator does have a COI as suggested by the various meatpuppets showing forum posts, which should disqualify this discussion from being valid. I was neutral in all of this until that was all revealed. I'd rather it be renominated by somebody who doesn't have one, can provide
1149:
Great post, thank you for this. This is a really, really clear conflict of interest. Atomicthumbs is a moderator of /r/shibe (the meme that
Dogecoin is based on) and clearly has a personal vendetta, going around reddit and doing things like linking to the Knowledge (XXG) page on Monopoly Money when
4161:
to name a couple. I do agree with your comment regarding the other altcoins, because they are relying heavily on technical documentation by their own creators, forum posts, and links to their own websites as source material. Dogecoin is different, and not just because it's based on one of the big,
2333:
The meatpuppetry, personal attacks, conspiracy theories and accusations of bad faith being thrown around on this AfD are simply embarrassing, but there is no longer a problem with sourcing. I still think there isn't much relevance to this coin beyond its connection to the meme, so a merge might be
1204:
In any case, the purpose for the AfD process is for Knowledge (XXG) users to reach a consensus. If people agree that it should stay, it stays! (And if you can find any reliable source for the article, instead of taking your time to allege a conflict of interest where none exists, it would help the
62:
that has affected this discussion. As such, I am moved to discount comments from at least half of this discussion. At which point, I am left with about 2:1 comments in favour of keeping the articles, most of which citing sources published after the article was nominated for deletion as evidence of
1331:
You actually have not explained why the sources are not "reliable sources" per the Knowledge (XXG) definition. The argument is hinging on the reliability of those sources, not your opinion of the coin's notability. Please provide your rationale on why those sources are not reliable or drop your
1200:
Taking my comments elsewhere out of context does not help your case, and does not help the fact that the subject of this article is not notable according to Knowledge (XXG)'s standards. I am following procedure here; I want to keep Knowledge (XXG) a good, high-quality place to learn about things.
3551:
Azurfrog, have you created a tally of the two different sides? If not, then your opinion is useless and may bias other readers. Your argument for deletion is not based on any Knowledge (XXG) guidelines and as such does not weigh as heavily as those that do, such as the one that indicates that it
2432:
I don't like the way this discussion is headed. Voting delete just because some meatpuppets voted the other way doesn't a advance the discussion. In fact I would suggest that both the votes of the meatpuppets and the ones who voted solely on reaction from the meatpuppetry be stricken, and we can
2387:
The nominator's politics is irrelevant. They could be a grand wizard of the klu klux klan, the pope, or Karl Marx. It doesn't matter. I believe dogecoin isn't yet notable, and that's the basis of my vote. It may become notable, but for the moment it should be in the doge article. Keep the reddit
4287:
Yep. Atomic decided to nominate Dogecoin up for deletion because he thought it didn't meet notability guidelines. He ended up having a lopsided discussion with most people going keep or merge, and even pissed off 4chan's /g/ board to the point that they released his personal information (phone
2842:
Secondly, the reason people are so up in arms about the COI issue is because of the second issue being raised by Acebulf. You do happen to moderate a sub-reddit that has had affiliations with this "supposed feminist group". For the moment, I'm going to assume good faith that this is all just a
1377:
You are correct, that would not make it notable. But that isn't what is being asserted as notable here. It is the articles listed that you keep brushing aside as part of the COI you obviously have. As for Fivexthethird, Dogecoin is profitable and is actively mined by a large number of people.
595:
Alexa rank is irrelevant when determining whether a source is reliable. An article needs reliable sources to establish notability, and this article has none, likely because the subject is not notable. Heavy.com, The Daily Dot, and Digital Trends are not reliable news organizations. Please see
4043:
Quick google search reveals several business articles including business insider, International Business Times UK, Digital Trends, The Verge, DailyTech referencing this item in the last couple days. This article could provide neutral background info for people looking for more information.
806:
I find it real hard to be neutral when the nominator himself can't. The majority of the sources listed aren't blogs, and I'm starting to wonder if Atomicthumbs have some sort of agenda, since he's seem unwilling to improve the article and would rather have it deleted as quickly as possible.
3969:
Such ADD. Many inclusionist. Wow. This probably shouldn't have been nominated for another week, by which point the majority of Knowledge (XXG)'s more sanguine AfD contributors would be busy with their new Lego and bikes. The only notable thing about this subject is how meta it is, which is
4248:
This would be the case if I were trying to suppress knowledge of Dogecoin. I think it's a funny thing, and am amused that it's the only cryptocurrency that came out ahead in this week's Bitcoin bubble burst, but when I nominated it for deletion, it didn't meet Knowledge (XXG)'s notability
3536:, but the influx of sources including a couple well-known ones have clearly fixed the issue to a large degree. At the very worst now, this discussion will end in a no concensus, or deletion followed by a speedy remake within a week, complete with all of these sources listed and then some.
2114:
This cryptocurrency is still in its infancy, but it is gaining popularity fast. It has been reported on a few news outlets so far as stated by others, and will continue to grow. There is no need to delete this page - maybe in a few weeks if this just crashes, but at this rate, I doubt it.
3814:
It's a worthless cryptocurrency that was created purely as a joke, but it has received vast amounts of coverage and it seems like that coverage isn't slowing yet. I'd be one of the first to vote delete normally, but it's just undeniable that this passes every notability guideline around.
3107:
Now, I don't exactly know much about the second link or anything about Complex Tech. That just happened to pop-up when I was searching for more sources, so that should be more deeply investigated on. The first one on the other hand, is likely the biggest source to talk about the currency
2904:
Again, I'm not accusing you of anything at all, simply because I doubt you are apart of this group, but the truth of the matter is that nobody knows for certain. Like Mark Arsten said, we shouldn't let COI issues dominate the discussion, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be taken into
2119:
decided to push this through to rustle everybody. If you ask me, that's a direct violation of my Knowledge (XXG) Freedoms⢠and I will not stand for it. If they are successful in the deletion of this page, I predict Knowledge (XXG) would lose much members and would eventually die with the
471:"Moderator"? Coming unsigned from an IP address with no other edits, this seems like a troll comment. That aside: what is "coinmarketcap.com"? Some random website on the Internet (#wow #whoa) that everyone is supposed to take as gospel because of reasons? This is actually quite a bit
1526:
Doge has grown from a proof of concept to an actual cryptocurrency in a matter of days. I see no reason why you should delete a page. I have seen hundreds of pages that seem more useless than this one, who chop one of them off. There is a whole community popping up around Dogecoin.
1992:
AfD nominator has clear CoI. Has one of the highest market caps for an altcoin, and certainly it would be useful for people wondering what Dogecoin is to be able to read a serious article about it on Knowledge (XXG), instead of a wow-interspersed joke article on some techblog.
549:
The wikipedia article about Digital Trends label it as a "high-tech lifestyle, technology news and information website that publishes news, reviews, guides, how-to articles, descriptive videos and podcasts about technology and consumer electronics products". Alexa rank: 1,842
3570:(or may not) meet GNG, but I view it as falling into the category of "breaking news events", because it is so recent, and because the sources are largely vaporware (not to mention the focus on its being the first currency to be based upon an Internet meme). Now, assessing
2353:
A comedy cryptocurrency of little note other than it's connection with the Doge meme. The meatpuppetry on this page is also a disaster; any discussion that accuses wikipedia users of being "evil Marxists and feminists" belongs either in the 1950s or on 4chan. Not here.
3970:
unsurprisingly why this AfD is such a train wreck given that our demographic regards Buzzfeed and Boing Boing as somewhat more essential to daily sustenance than oxygen. There is utterly no evidence of anything beyond routine coverage from specialist sources here.
385:
YOSPOS isn't a trolling forum, it's a computer forum. Are you for real? This has nothing to do with anything, either. If there's a valid reason for deleting or merging the article, it should be allowed to happen whether it was nominated by Jesus Christ or Pol
3883:
That's why my support vote and comment were seperate. I know that an articles views have nothing to do with notability (and could easily be forged) but if the subject is showing obvious notability we don't need to expose all those users to an ugly template.
1332:
case to have the article deleted. All you've done is link the page about reliable sources, but you did not provide any reason whatsoever why the sources quoted here do not meet that definition. Proof by assertion is not a valid way to make your point.
1168:
First of all, I'm not sure that being a Reddit user counts as a "conflict of interest". Second, "has a conflict of interest" does not mean "is automatically wrong about everything". This line of argument is specious at best, and disingenuous at worst.
1201:(How does my participation in a meme site represent a conflict of interest in regards to a cryptocurrency article, anyway? If that's a conflict of interest, wouldn't actually using the cryptocurrency in question be more of a conflict of interest?)
2205:
Please explain my conflict of interest. I am a moderator of a subreddit of dog memes; I joined for fun a few months ago, when someone wanted to close it down; I joined because I thought the memes were funny and the dogs were cute, and so I could
2870:
Wow such heated. Doge support marxist feminist say pls no capitalism, such gender inequality, Pls gibbe class conciousness. Much traditions of all dead doges weigh like a nightmare on the brains of such living. Pls assume good faith
2951:. An encyclopedia is a repository of knowledge. To say that it is unacceptable for someone to come to Knowledge (XXG) to acquire knowledge goes against everything an encyclopedia, and in particular Knowledge (XXG), stands for and does.
3004:- Too recent to decide. None of the sources are serious, reliable news organizations, but there does seem to be more coverage than for the average cryptocurrency. I would suggest moving the article to article incubator or merging with
2373:
that political leaning. Basically it comes down to the nominator is part of a group which has tried in the past to censor Knowledge (XXG), and also are vehemently against cryptocurrencies. I believe it was relevant to the discussion.
537:
The wikipedia article about The daily dot label it as "an online newspaper that covers internet topics. It aims to be the "hometown newspaper" of the internet. It has a 25 member editorial staff.". Clearly not a blog. Alexa rank:
823:
How is the nominator being "non-neutral"? By not spending a week dredging up nonexistent sources before nominating an article for deletion? Since when is nominating an article for deletion indicative of horrifying, spiteful,
4267:, which is hardly the case now. I'd rather you'd just withdraw the discussion and end all this nonsense for awhile until some other individual comes up with another reason, given the circumstances, but that's just me.
4201:
as per above argument. Notable enough for inclusion along with other altcoins, but not yet notable enough for its own article. If Dogecoin gains notability and reliable sources, I would favor it having its own article.
440:
Coinmarketcap.com listed doge with a 3.5 million dollar market cap. Not sure why there is even a discussion on this articles deletion. Obviously this alt coin is bigger than 80% of the others on the market in way less
2049:
Please tell me more about how being maybe-sorta associated with "radical feminists" with a "penchant towards marxism" automatically invalidates someone's opinions regarding the notability of a cryptocurrency article.
975:- many sources have been posted above. "I don't think any of these qualify" is not a reason to disregard them and delete the article. This is a clearly well known currency that has heavy coverage on many websites. --
2143:: I've semi-protected this page due to the flood of single purpose accounts and IPs recruited from other sites. While I have no evidence to support the idea of sockpuppetry, this does seem to be a violation of our
3278:. As talked about before by many other users, this currency is actually becoming more popular everyday and there is enough interest to keep the article among editors. This is definitely an article worth keeping.
1849:
This has gained the most popularity in the shortest time frame compared to any other cryptocurrency. There is no reason for this page to be deleted whatsoever. I think this coin will succeed. 20:23 15 December
2482:- literally days old, with very little (code-wise, usage-wise, or otherwise) to differentiate it from any number of other copy-and-paste forked cryptocurrencies. No reliable sources to speak of at this time.
318:
1922:
Atomicthumbs is a SomethingAwful forum member and is the one who tagged it for speedy deletion to get a rise out of people. This is a very, very clear bad faith proposal and is probably even just trolling.
2821:
How is a forum post in which I repost speedy deletion contestation comments I find amusing, like "I oppose this article being deleted because IT'S REALLY MONEY YOU FUCKING IDIOT", a conflict of interest?
1741:
The coin's market cap is higher than that of many other altcoins we have articles for, and Doge has generated significant media coverage and incredible growth in the mere two weeks or so it's existed. Â â
3150:), above. It is too early to tell yet whether or not this currency will succeed or fail. In addition, the originator of the delete tag has marked more than one crypto currency article for deletion (See
4166:, but because it's outperforming in a time when Bitcoin and every other altcoin is shitting the bed because of China's opinion on the legal status of altcoins. That's stirring up a little thing called
2091:
Could we leave the Reddit drama on Reddit please? This discussion is about whether the page meets Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, the personal motives of individuals here aren't really relevant to that.
1884:
It seems to be a rather popular alternative *coin, and rising in popularity very quickly. At least wait to see if the bubble bursts and it fades into obscurity, but as it is now it seems notable.
2238:
You can thank Lopez for that. I had no idea people would be going so far as to release your personal information over an article, and I feel the need to apologize that this is happening to you.
1634:- Let's forget the idea of the nominators conflict-of-interest for a moment, that (may be) a red herring. If the reliability of the sources is in question, someone should inquire about them at
2029:
Notability established above per many, many posts. It seems like there is a lot of users now sourcing claims and the article seems like it will assert its notability from now and going forward.
3025:
The references are definitely here to assert notability, even if my inner gut feeling tells me this isn't notable, the coverage it has received shows some. If not keep then a possible merge.
1197:
because the person in question (who was probably not from the United States) seemed to be interpreting the phrase (when someone else used it) as talking about money with an economic monopoly.
553:
Wholly irrelevant. If this is a metric of reliability, then I'll just post "Dogecoin is non-notable" on Facebook and cite it as a source (because I mean, just look at Facebook's Alexa rank!)
1692:
Note that you might see some input on there from users who have an opinion about this deletion discussion, which might lead to a rehash of the same sort of back-and-forth seen on this AfD.
3346:(although it's more like sleet with meatballs mixed in.), but at this rate, I'm going to have quite a time trying to get all of these sources listed in the right places. I'd like to thank
1484:
1018:- it may prove transient and ephemeral but itâs too soon to tell. At one point, that was also true of Knowledge (XXG). In the meantime, Itâs hilarious; which seems a good argument to me.
2268:
Aw, hell, it's hardly your fault. Some people get way too worked up about silly things, and when they have too much time on their hands, they do this kinda stuff. It's funny, in a way.
3748:
not notable to me, but Knowledge (XXG) is not about editors making judgement calls based on intuition. Objectively this is notable, and that prevails over any subjective assessments
2148:
271:
120:
4288:
number, address, name, etc; all that has since been removed from what I can observe). That kinda seems to represent an unintended consequence according to the streissand effect.
2789:. This whole discussion should've ended and have been reopened by a third-party individual the second the COI claims started to pour in, because it's a complete disregarding of
506:
The wikipedia article about heavy.com label it as a broadband entertainment website founded in 1999 in New York City. Clearly not a blog. The Alexa rank for heavy.com is 2,882.
2758:. I don't think that this will be the last we'll see of the article if it's deleted, because I truly believe that the sources are reliable and more will follow in the future.
4127:? Merge, wait a few weeks, see if anything new happens and any more sources emerge (they won't, because this is a fad). If they do, make a separate article. Otherwise, don't.
3050:
It's got plentiful of sources to back it up and has plenty of notability to be kept. It is also getting more and more popular as an investment tool and asset diversification.
2764:
Yes, I think you're right. I know that this was posted to 4chan's /pol/ board (which is how I discovered the discussion) a few days ago, but I suspect it goes beyond that. â
923:
You're going to ignore million dollar plus websites (yes, check out what they've been sold as) being run by a sizeable paid staff of writers? They're certainly significant.
746:
Link to them. "Trees can totally talk and jump over stuff and use firearms, there are millions of verifiable sources that confirm this, just look into it, it's developing."
50:
The role of a closing admin is to judge a discussion for consensus, based on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments, ignoring any comments that offer nothing more than
3942:
which currently have pages. I say keep for now. If in a month/ year the coin is dead and nobody is writing about it / paying attention to it, then relist it for deletion.
2750:- the only reason people are voting delete all of a sudden is because the meatpuppets have poisoned the whole discussion. Everybody who is claiming these are all blogs are
1608:
Contrary to it's name this coin is just as legit as other cryptocurrencies and hence it deserves a page. Also the original poster displays an obvious conflict of interest.
2554:
2534:
2514:
3699:
3176:
312:
3008:. The COI accusations towards the nominator are plain nonsense (and immaterial to boot), it's almost as if the accusers haven't even bothered to read the policy.
3604:
of a potential new currency than anything else, which IS an event (I would even say that is is an event badly in need of advertising to be successful ;-)...). --
909:
Notability is a specific concept that requires significant coverage in a reliable source such as a news organization. Again, I don't think any of these qualify.
3704:
3186:
1488:
2115:
Furthermore, there's increasing evidence that the whole reason why this has been tagged for speedy deletion is from some member on the infamous "troll" forum
1059:- I'd wait a week before a final decision, as Dogecoin is still very new. If Dogecoin does become more mainstream, we can always recreate the article, right?
2948:
3338:- This little guy comes from an IP on the talk page who requested it be listed here. It's a Russian news source, so have your translators fired up again:
3600:
I am fully aware that a currency is NOT an event; but here, we are talking of a would-be currency just a few days old! so this article is more about the
3797:- Such notable. Very coverage addressing topic. Much reliable independent sources. So ongoing coverage. Pls 5 pillars. Wow! #plsdontdeletethedoge
3664:
3644:
3430:, certainly notable at the present time. The article can be merged later if Dogecoin doesn't last. But at the moment it's a notable current event.
2586:
2578:
1675:
994:
890:
881:
619:
3247:
a little too much that it would begin to disrupt actual discussion. If it seems like I'm doing that, I apologize, since that wasn't my intention.
3240:
Another one by InvestorPlace, this one being English, also popped up in the same search. I don't know much about this one, so it's up for debate.
1219:
If you are the moderator of /r/shibe then that very clearly opens you up to a huge huge huge case of COI. And this whole AfD should be rethought.
2210:. The subreddit has no connection to Dogecoin. I don't see how this (or reposting comments on another forum) constitutes a conflict of interest.
2075:
278:
3187:
Dogecoin: o nouÄ criptomonedÄ a luat naĹtere pe Reddit Ĺi Tumblr Wow, such profit: Depois da Bitcoin, surge a Dogecoin como nova "cripto-moeda"
993:
The problem here is that it doesn't matter 'how' many websites something has been covered on; if none of them are a reliable source (which has
776:
per being the article creator, however most of the sources actually aren't blogs, or at least that's the last time I checked such sources like
3684:
3088:
954:
3373:
even though Vice usually does pretty well on technology-related subjects, but I'll go ahead and also leave it up here for people to debate.
2710:
2199:
Regardless, we have two parties with different POVs and COIs that have turned this entire discussion into something completely different.
1865:
457:
4452:, the fact that the underlying meme is hated by so many people is not a reason to delete a page about a specific currency, currencies are
3955:
It seems like it has been widely covered in reliable sources. I doubt the project will last, but that does not mean it is not notable. --
3914:). As seen in the news articles that others linked, dogecoin is in fact notable and a legitimate currency, and thus shouldn't be deleted.
1477:, 0.00000070 BTC/DOGE and a 4375 BTC market cap means it's got the 19th higest market cap of all cryptocurrencies already. obvious keep.
1317:
and no limit on coins mined, and it rapidly rocketed to the top of the cryptocurrency mining rate charts, this would not make it notable.
812:
808:
129:
3679:
2592:
887:
2676:
Much incorrect. So notable. Very reliable sources independent of the subject. Pls read 5 pillars. Wow 01:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2125:
1973:
1932:
1812:
1722:
1643:
1615:
1424:
1379:
1333:
1298:
1230:
1151:
1115:
976:
669:
623:
581:
2714:
159:
4319:
3724:
3416:
3374:
1994:
1541:
3768:
3734:
378:
which may not be visible without an account. I'm going to break down your own arguments and then attempt to refute them individually.
17:
4387:
2073:
1885:
1593:
4263:
Who said you were trying to suppress knowledge? You were simply acting per policy at the time when this article likely didn't meet
3700:
http://adrenaline.uol.com.br/internet/noticias/19752/wow-such-profit-depois-da-bitcoin-surge-a-dogecoin-como-nova-cripto-moeda.html
1928:
375:
3836:
just snow keep this? It's ridiculous how we're showing over 20,000 users per day a deletion template when they visit the article.
3294:
2725:
I'm afraid you're completely mistaken. Every citation is taken from a reliable source, and none of these are personal blogs. â
3241:
3705:
http://adevarul.ro/tech/internet/dogecoino-noua-criptomoneda-luat-nastere-reddit-tumblr-1_52aff55ac7b855ff56c4f42f/index.html
3659:
3586:. Most of the Keep "votes" seem to rely on the subject meeting GNG, regardless of the overwhelming buzz element (here again,
2584:
666:
4273:
Not to veer even further off topic, but I'm confused by this. Didn't you just say the streissand effect was a good analogy?
145:
957:
The list of notable sources covering Dogecoin just keeps on growing! (which means this news will spread to many many more:
728:
There's been a lot more coverage over this article by valid sources recently, just look into it, its certainly developing.
2147:
guideline. Note that arguments not grounded in Knowledge (XXG) policy will be discarded by the closing administrator. See
2224:
Also, thanks for showing me that 4chan thread, Citation Needed; I know where the weird phone calls are coming from now.
1420:
244:
239:
4483:
3709:
3205:
I was leaning towards delete when this started, but there is an article at The Verge and other reliable sources now. --
3192:
1560:
333:
42:
2305:
Coverage of this coin has been limited to blogs and sites of limited reputability so far, this article might not pass
370:
The user, Atomicthumbs, who nominated this article for deletion is a known troll. A screenshot of his post is visible
248:
3934:). It appears it will be a fairly sizable cryptocurrency in the future. The marketcap is already approaching that of
3557:
3456:
788:. There have been quite a lot of these coins being nominated for deletion due to various reasons, most of them being
300:
55:
622:), which is a more reputable news source than the others listed. This source appears in Google News search results.
1099:
Atomicthumbs is a Reddit user who just happens to not like DogeCoin and cryptocurrency in general, as you can see
349:
Subject appears non-notable. Sources restricted to blogs. Note what may be meatpuppetry occuring on the talk page.
3665:
http://www.geek.com/apps/the-best-invention-on-the-internet-dogecoin-a-more-viable-alternative-to-bitcoin-1579442/
3645:
http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/wow-dogecoin-is-a-bitcoin-alternative-for-mutt-and-meme-lovers-1207251
891:
http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/wow-dogecoin-is-a-bitcoin-alternative-for-mutt-and-meme-lovers-1207251
882:
http://www.geek.com/apps/the-best-invention-on-the-internet-dogecoin-a-more-viable-alternative-to-bitcoin-1579442/
620:
http://www.geek.com/apps/the-best-invention-on-the-internet-dogecoin-a-more-viable-alternative-to-bitcoin-1579442/
118:
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is
4417:
3714:
3234:
694:
A mention in a list in a freelance columnist's column is not sufficient to establish significant coverage as per
231:
3984:
Are you seriously calling everybody ADD because the majority of people have a conflicting opinion? Can you read
3595:
2461:
Striking delete votes because canvassers got their hand caught in the cookie jar doesn't make much sense to me.
2077:
It seems like the nominator is a member of SRS, which explains his motives behind trying to censor the article.
191:
4010:
4005:, shows the level of public interest in this, and need to go to a reasonably reliable source to find out more.
3930:- Dogecoin has obviously gotten a lot of media attention but that alone does not guarantee lasting notability (
2706:
2693:
2314:
1869:
461:
4449:
4174:
raised by the nominator, which the majority of people here (not including the meatpuppets) are agreeing meets
3583:
3365:'s Motherboard section made a report on Doge, but this one happens to be a blog (specifically, it falls under
2804:
1363:
No one would mine such a coin, as there would be no money to be made. Also, the coin is just over a week old!
1354:
they're not notable. Especially when the majority of users here think otherwise about these multiple sources.
1077:
1036:
51:
4333:- Although there are no novel developments in Dogecoin, in my opinion Dogecoin is notable as it is the first
854:
Assumptions of bad faith and personal attacks don't make for useful deletion discussions. Keep it to policy.
574:
This may or may not be true. Assuming this is true, perhaps a lockdown of the article is a better approach?
374:. The actual post is on the SomethingAwful YOSPOS forum, a known computer trolling forum. The actual post is
4430:
4363:
4158:
4133:
3889:
3841:
3820:
3323:
3013:
2984:
2962:
2938:
2662:
2617:
2444:
2129:
2056:
2017:
1977:
1936:
1816:
1775:
1748:
1726:
1647:
1619:
1463:
1458:- Clear conflict of interest, as per 72.241.150.12. Additionally, I am going to try to find better sources.
1445:
1383:
1368:
1337:
1302:
1266:
1234:
1229:
groups he is a part of. This is straight up, pure and simple, a vote put up in bad faith to push an agenda.
1175:
1155:
1119:
980:
939:
837:
752:
673:
627:
585:
559:
519:
481:
424:
392:
4185:
3282:
2184:
As always, comments which are not grounded in the Knowledge (XXG) inclusion policy will not be considered.
1969:
1861:
1718:
1611:
1537:
1480:
1294:
1132:
I'm amused Atomicthumbs supports dollars "because it is backed by the US government"! lol.... much amused.
1111:
577:
453:
175:
149:
80:
4316:
4254:
3685:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/16/5216862/bitcoin-is-so-2013-dogecoin-is-new-crypto-currency-on-the-block
3654:
3553:
3452:
3412:
3089:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/16/5216862/bitcoin-is-so-2013-dogecoin-is-new-crypto-currency-on-the-block
2861:
2827:
2582:
2273:
2229:
2215:
1998:
1683:
1665:
1545:
1322:
1210:
1100:
1084:
1043:
1002:
955:
http://www.theverge.com/2013/12/16/5216862/bitcoin-is-so-2013-dogecoin-is-new-crypto-currency-on-the-block
914:
703:
644:
609:
497:
354:
294:
3694:
3591:
3127:
2702:
2689:
877:
It is only a few days old but the currency is exploding in popularity with multiple mainstream mentions:
134:
4479:
4382:
4342:
4232:
3975:
3033:
3009:
2980:
2934:
2812:
2613:
2156:
2096:
1889:
1589:
38:
3366:
3343:
3309:
3055:
3680:
http://www.slashgear.com/dogecoin-digital-currency-takes-on-bitcoin-with-a-bit-of-meme-flair-11308557/
3120:. So far, it's looking a tiny bit more brighter for Dogecoin as far as Knowledge (XXG) is concerned.
888:
http://www.slashgear.com/dogecoin-digital-currency-takes-on-bitcoin-with-a-bit-of-meme-flair-11308557/
665:
Dogecoin was listed along with other cryptocurrencies in an article for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
4278:
4063:. How many altcoin articles are necessary? Going to dustcoin.com alone will tell us the existence of
3960:
3290:
2920:
2772:
2733:
2466:
2339:
2322:
1952:
1797:
1697:
1567:
1510:
1416:
1250:
1064:
859:
290:
4453:
3931:
3579:
3068:
789:
597:
4464:
4460:
4436:
4408:
4404:
4389:
4369:
4346:
4323:
4289:
4282:
4268:
4258:
4243:
4235:
4217:
4211:
4207:
4189:
4179:
4136:
4053:
4049:
4033:
4029:
4014:
4006:
3989:
3979:
3964:
3946:
3922:
3893:
3870:
3860:
3845:
3824:
3806:
3786:
3782:
3772:
3764:
3757:
3753:
3725:
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/dogecoin-brings-the-cryptocurrency-craze-to-its-logical-conclusion
3613:
3561:
3537:
3515:
3480:
3460:
3439:
3420:
3397:
3377:
3375:
http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/dogecoin-brings-the-cryptocurrency-craze-to-its-logical-conclusion
3329:
3298:
3270:
3266:
3251:
3248:
3214:
3195:
3158:
3147:
3130:
3121:
3102:
3091:
3079:
3075:
3059:
3042:
3017:
2988:
2970:
2942:
2924:
2906:
2880:
2865:
2837:
2831:
2816:
2798:
2779:
2759:
2740:
2697:
2669:
2635:
2621:
2603:
2566:
2546:
2526:
2507:
2491:
2487:
2470:
2452:
2424:
2420:
2397:
2382:
2363:
2343:
2326:
2277:
2239:
2233:
2219:
2200:
2194:
2179:
2160:
2133:
2100:
2086:
2059:
2044:
2002:
1981:
1956:
1940:
1912:
1893:
1873:
1839:
1831:
1820:
1801:
1783:
1754:
1730:
1701:
1687:
1669:
1651:
1623:
1598:
1571:
1549:
1514:
1492:
1467:
1448:
1387:
1372:
1358:
1341:
1326:
1306:
1269:
1254:
1238:
1223:
1214:
1178:
1159:
1136:
1088:
1068:
1047:
1027:
1006:
984:
965:
942:
927:
918:
900:
863:
849:
840:
816:
793:
755:
737:
707:
677:
648:
631:
613:
589:
562:
522:
484:
465:
427:
395:
358:
326:
96:
3769:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/internet-gold-doge-bitcoin-dogecoin/article/2541000?custom_click=rss
3735:
http://washingtonexaminer.com/internet-gold-doge-bitcoin-dogecoin/article/2541000?custom_click=rss
3674:
2590:
884:
695:
544:
76:
4424:
4357:
4129:
4104:
4084:
3935:
3885:
3856:
3837:
3816:
3802:
3669:
3609:
3511:
3318:
2953:
2876:
2836:
First off, I think we are all mature enough not to delude into cursing over a AfD nomination...
2654:
2631:
2595:
2588:
2503:
2435:
2393:
2359:
2174:
2052:
2013:
1835:
1766:
1743:
1639:
1459:
1441:
1364:
1262:
1171:
935:
893:
833:
748:
733:
555:
532:
515:
477:
420:
388:
181:
112:
3587:
3575:
3503:
3369:), so I was originally hesitant to bring this one up. This one might need to be talked about at
1929:
http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3537995&userid=171134#post423196590
340:
68:
4112:
2754:
that they are blogs, nor are they giving any evidence that they are unreliable other than just
4420:
4309:
4304:
4250:
4100:
4092:
3939:
3408:
2857:
2823:
2562:
2542:
2522:
2378:
2269:
2225:
2211:
2192:
2082:
2040:
2011:
Except the only sources for the "serious article" are the "wow-interspersed joke articles"...
1966:
Keep it because it's an important part of the internet, this currency will be in our history
1679:
1661:
1318:
1206:
1080:
1039:
1023:
998:
910:
699:
640:
605:
350:
31:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
4478:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
4145:
The funny thing is that sources HAVE BEEN emerging after this discussion started. Names like
4124:
4120:
4116:
4096:
3477:
DOGECOIN: How A Thing That Started As A Joke Became The Hottest Digital Currency In The World
2794:
2144:
601:
415:
59:
37:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
4379:
4338:
4227:
4146:
4108:
3971:
3627:
3467:
3435:
3351:
3210:
3155:
3151:
3051:
3026:
2808:
2599:
2152:
2092:
1584:
4264:
4175:
3985:
3866:
3530:
3448:
3370:
2976:
2790:
2685:
2650:
2412:
2306:
2170:
1635:
1503:
72:
64:
4274:
3956:
3729:
3660:
http://triblive.com/business/brownebusiness/5224450-74/bitcoin-currency-gold#axzz2nbu4eloN
3476:
3286:
3172:
2916:
2767:
2728:
2462:
2335:
2318:
1948:
1908:
1903:
It may be somewhat of a joke or a parody on cryptocurrencies, but it still is noteworthy.
1793:
1693:
1563:
1506:
1246:
1060:
855:
667:
http://triblive.com/business/brownebusiness/5224450-74/bitcoin-currency-gold#axzz2nVURDtM8
3689:
3099:
3087:
Brand new source that we can use to show how people are using it as a means of exchange.
1790:
1243:
958:
2915:
Just walked in looking for info on this coin.... Isn't that what Knowledge (XXG)'s for?
600:. Additionally, search engine hits should never be relied upon to prove notability (see
4456:
4400:
4334:
4203:
4045:
4025:
3778:
3749:
3494:
3393:
3262:
3191:
Finally, we have a Russian source by Slon.ru (this one, I also don't know much about):
3143:
3071:
2483:
2416:
2207:
2116:
1428:
785:
3719:
3339:
1764:
I find it hard to support the nomination if the nominator isn't acting in good faith.
1715:
Whether these or any other currencies are "fake money" is surely a topic for debate.
306:
4242:
You couldn't have hit the nail harder on the head if you could. A barnstar for you!
4001:
Clearly notable now, multiple coverage in notable sources. BTW on the article stats,
3943:
3852:
3798:
3631:
3605:
3507:
3355:
2872:
2627:
2499:
2389:
2355:
1439:, but Dogecoin does not necessarily deserve an article due to it being "profitable".
781:
729:
450:
Maybe the moderator is just confused, or doesn't know enough about crypto currency.
235:
92:
3710:
http://slon.ru/appheroes/dogecoin-glavnyy-mem-goda-stal-kriptovalyutoy-1035115.xhtml
2688:, only sources provided have been blogs that are not reliable sources. Not notable.
3230:
2787:
didn't bother looking at sources, won't explain why because muh notability claims."
2558:
2538:
2518:
2374:
2185:
2078:
2036:
1408:
1019:
209:
197:
165:
58:, with appropriate weights given to different comments with regards to the obvious
1811:
It's definitely more real than a lot of other crypto currencies I've come across.
265:
3471:
just released an article. A snowy, merry Christmas seems to be in order for this
3407:, same rationale as Mike Young, and the sourcing is not unreliable or trivial. -
3098:
We have another source. They're popping up like flies now that the week started.
2852:. What similar dealings has this "feminist group" have with Knowledge (XXG), and
144:
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to
3915:
3431:
3347:
3313:
3206:
3182:
3005:
2310:
2301:
1355:
1220:
1133:
962:
924:
897:
846:
777:
418:. A lot of people talking about a thing does not mean that a thing is notable.
3715:
http://www.wired.it/economia/finanza/2013/12/17/dogecoin-valuta-digitale-meme/
3177:
Wow, such profit: Depois da Bitcoin, surge a Dogecoin como nova "cripto-moeda"
1904:
896:
In my opinion we're waaay past the point of debating if it is notable or not!
845:
Maybe Atomicthumbs holds a sizeable holding in a competing currency... ! ;-)
4414:
4154:
4080:
3472:
3388:
3221:
3117:
3113:
3865:
Article view hits don't count as part of the argument that Dogecoin passes
4337:
to be based on a meme. If nothing else this is an interesting phenomenon.
4002:
1947:
Where in that link does he claim that he is getting a rise out of anyone?
4385:
4088:
4076:
4068:
3911:
3907:
2121:
1436:
1404:
636:
227:
102:
88:
4064:
3655:
http://www.heavy.com/tech/2013/12/dogecoin-what-is-shibe-cryptocurrenc/
3649:
2580:
1559:
Maybe you should open deletion discussions for these bad articles. See
1432:
878:
498:
http://www.heavy.com/tech/2013/12/dogecoin-what-is-shibe-cryptocurrenc/
67:. On this basis, without prejudice to any future proposal for possible
3695:
http://www.qore.com/noticias/12867/Dogecoin-podria-desplazar-a-Bitcoin
3128:
http://www.qore.com/noticias/12867/Dogecoin-podria-desplazar-a-Bitcoin
2166:
4072:
3386:, source coverage showing there is improvement possibilities here. â
1660:
I am putting together an RSN post now. Thank you for the suggestion!
1104:
509:"Broadband entertainment"? Oh, it was founded in New York City, that
3126:
Another source popped-up, except this one is in Spanish presumably.
2498:
Much incorrect. Very reliable sources independent of such subject.
1502:
I was not aware that BTC exchange rates were a fundamental part of
4150:
1412:
1924:
1194:
371:
4472:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
3362:
3675:
http://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/wow-dogecoin-bitcoin/
885:
http://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/wow-dogecoin-bitcoin/
545:
http://www.digitaltrends.com/social-media/wow-dogecoin-bitcoin/
83:
that has been directed at the nominator, the result is (sadly)
3670:
http://www.dailydot.com/business/shibe-meme-dogecoin-currency/
894:
http://www.dailydot.com/business/shibe-meme-dogecoin-currency/
533:
http://www.dailydot.com/business/shibe-meme-dogecoin-currency/
107:
4356:- wow. much cite. such notable. many independent coverage. --
1260:
stop trying to make the debate about random off-site drama.
138:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments,
1830:
I believe this will be as huge as Bitcoin. We may keep it.
3116:, which also owns and manages other major brands such as
571:"Note what may be meatpuppetry occuring on the talk page"
128:
among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has
3312:(what's next? Is Doge itself going to get a page? Oh...
2317:, especially if they have a monetary stake in Dogecoin.
792:
cases, that it's seemed to blur the lines quite a bit.
3730:
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-dogecoin-2013-12
3566:
OK, I may have been a bit cryptic here: subject matter
2848:
1532:
261:
257:
253:
3690:
http://www.complex.com/tech/2013/12/dogecoin-on-reddit
3100:
http://www.complex.com/tech/2013/12/dogecoin-on-reddit
2803:
Actually, no. The presence of a COI is not one of the
1528:
959:
http://www.complex.com/tech/2013/12/dogecoin-on-reddit
325:
2747:
Request userfication or submission into the Incubator
2577:
Seems to have enough coverage from reliable sources.
71:, and noting the strongest possible objection to the
1421:
article about the guy down the street who grows weed
3720:
http://hitech.newsru.com/article/17dec2013/dogecoin
3340:
http://hitech.newsru.com/article/17dec2013/dogecoin
339:
4413:How is that relevant? Notability is the criteria;
3154:). We should also discuss this as well. Sean Egan
3193:Dogecoin: поŃĐ˛Đ°Ń ĐşŃипŃОваНŃŃĐ°, ĐžŃĐ˝ĐžĐ˛Đ°Đ˝Đ˝Đ°Ń Đ˝Đ° ПоПо
1350:they're not notable, that is a long way short of
45:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4486:). No further edits should be made to this page.
4423:are relevant and included on Knowledge (XXG). --
2785:AND explain for a more solid reason other than "
639:says it's a weblog. Make of that what you will.
618:Geek.com has written an article about dogecoin (
543:Digital trends has this article about dogecoin:
406:Argument #1: "The subject appears non-notable".
3590:is more relevant, with such adequate points as
3447:There are sufficient sources that help it meet
3242:Sick of Virtual Currency Bitcoin? Meet Dogecoin
1108:wikipedia page. 08:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
531:The daily dot has this article about dogecoin:
3744:it's not notable, doesn't mean it isn't. This
4249:requirements as no reliable sources existed.
2555:list of Software-related deletion discussions
2535:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
2515:list of Business-related deletion discussions
158:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected
8:
3524:You can deny this or not, but most of these
3235:Dogecoin, la valuta digitale nata da un meme
2553:Note: This debate has been included in the
2533:Note: This debate has been included in the
2513:Note: This debate has been included in the
995:a well-defined definition on Knowledge (XXG)
3308:: Wow. Such sources. Much notability. Very
953:Now we've got The Verge covering Dogecoin:
496:Heavy.com has this article about dogecoin:
2552:
2532:
2512:
132:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and
3502:launch of this "would-be currency" fails
2626:Many article. Very not passing mention.
2309:. This content might be better merged to
1931:but requires a SA forum account to view.
1425:article about his weed-growing enterprise
1417:article about growing weed and selling it
152:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.
3175:, Brazil's largest Internet provider):
2612:Such blogs. Much passing mention. Wow.
1195:linked to the article on monopoly money
4188:isn't a vaild argument for deletion.
3185:article (Major Romanian news source):
1427:. Similarly, there are articles about
1078:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball.
1037:Knowledge (XXG) is not a crystal ball.
3912:http://www.reddit.com/user/dogetipbot
3908:http://www.reddit.com/user/bitcointip
3777:Thank you! added and tagged as added
2905:consideration by the closing admin.
2846:For god's sake, I'm not cursing, I'm
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
4164:EVERY WIKIPEDIAN should be afraid of
3650:http://www.geekosystem.com/dogecoin/
3574:as a (minor) "event" shows it fails
879:http://www.geekosystem.com/dogecoin/
3972:Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward)
3249:Goodbye Bitcoin, hello DogecoinâŚwow
3165:Much sources, so multiple languages
2849:quoting verbatim from the talk page
2300:Weakest possible keep, or merge to
1485:2001:470:DC2E:2:B165:B049:AFC8:B38F
4003:this page gets 20,000 visits a day
3626:- I came here as a result of the '
3171:An Adrenaline.com.br (operated by
2949:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia
2805:criteria for speedy closing an AfD
24:
3534:ONLY when this discussion started
2947:Then what do you think it's for?
2388:politics out of the discussion.
111:
3851:Agreed, very snow, much balls.
2208:post a banner I made at the top
997:), the subject is not notable.
434:"Sources restricted to blogs."
3167:- The floodgates are opening:
2756:claiming they are "unreliable"
1925:http://i.imgur.com/bh69HoH.png
1:
4465:01:42, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
4437:08:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
4409:22:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4390:21:27, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4370:21:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4347:20:18, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4324:04:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4290:01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4283:01:25, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4269:00:46, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4259:00:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4244:22:45, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4236:22:41, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4218:23:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4216:See my comment above yours.
4212:21:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4190:19:45, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
4180:23:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4162:bad evil internet memes that
4137:21:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4054:21:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4034:18:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
4015:19:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3990:17:39, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3980:16:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3965:15:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3947:06:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3923:02:09, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3894:11:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3871:01:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3861:01:19, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3846:01:17, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3825:01:06, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3807:00:26, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3787:23:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3773:22:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3763:You forgot one source by the
3758:21:31, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3634:19:36 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3614:09:55, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3572:the creation of this currency
3562:00:13, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
3538:19:01, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3516:18:04, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3481:17:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3461:15:30, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
3440:19:16, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3421:10:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3398:05:52, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3378:02:35, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3361:Also, I've also noticed that
3330:01:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3299:00:19, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
3271:21:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3252:19:10, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3215:14:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3196:12:59, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3159:03:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3131:01:21, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
3122:22:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3103:20:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3092:19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3080:18:53, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3060:17:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3043:16:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
3018:15:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2989:17:54, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2971:17:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2943:15:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2925:14:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2907:19:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2881:01:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2866:20:27, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2838:18:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2832:18:29, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2817:18:13, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2799:12:58, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2780:12:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2760:12:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2741:09:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2698:07:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2670:06:19, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2636:01:31, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2622:15:43, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2604:04:53, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2567:21:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2547:21:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2527:21:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2508:01:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2492:04:08, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2471:04:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2453:03:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2425:00:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2398:01:34, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
2383:13:52, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2364:00:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2344:02:30, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2327:00:28, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
2278:22:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2240:21:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2234:21:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2220:21:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2201:21:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2195:21:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2180:21:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2161:21:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2134:20:41, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2101:21:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2087:21:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2060:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
2045:20:38, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
2003:20:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1982:20:22, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1957:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1941:20:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1913:19:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1894:19:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1874:19:37, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1840:18:07, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1821:17:13, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1802:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1784:16:42, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1755:16:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1731:16:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1702:17:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1688:01:10, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1670:21:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1652:15:51, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1624:15:05, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1599:14:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1572:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1550:13:47, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1515:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1493:13:28, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1468:12:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1449:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
1388:19:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1373:12:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1359:14:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1342:19:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1327:10:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1307:10:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1270:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
1255:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
1239:19:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1224:14:31, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1215:10:25, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1179:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
1160:09:12, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1137:14:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1089:08:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1069:08:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1048:08:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1028:08:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
1007:08:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
985:07:59, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
966:20:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
943:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
928:14:20, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
919:06:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
901:06:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
864:00:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
850:14:23, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
841:22:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
817:12:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
794:01:57, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
756:22:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
738:23:41, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
708:03:10, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
678:02:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
649:03:06, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
632:02:48, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
614:02:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
590:01:52, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
563:22:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
523:22:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
513:means it's not a blog. What?
485:22:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
466:19:46, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
428:22:02, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
396:21:47, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
359:01:29, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
148:on the part of others and to
97:18:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
3342:. I don't know much about a
1413:article about selling things
1409:article about growing things
3740:Remember, just because you
3336:Source update & comment
1401:Profitability != notability
4503:
933:you reverse your opinion?
809:Explain your comments here
4378:nomination is withdrawn.
3067:To early to decide. And
1927:. Actual thread is here:
1415:and there can even be an
4475:Please do not modify it.
3640:- notable, heres proof:
2975:Not just any knowledge.
475:reliable than Buzzfeed.
34:Please do not modify it.
4159:The Washington Examiner
4024:Nominator known troll.
2653:, no reliable sources.
1583:per above arguments. --
1419:. However, there is no
1205:article a great deal.)
1150:Dogecoin is mentioned.
190:; accounts blocked for
160:single-purpose accounts
130:policies and guidelines
4448:Deletion requests are
3229:Here's the big one by
1858:It is the best coin.
1411:, and there can be an
1407:, and there can be an
4399:, pure masturbation.
2715:few or no other edits
2169:It seems they have a
1920:Further proof of COI:
3261:. Notable enough. --
2797:at the very least.
2717:outside this topic.
1533:http://dogepool.com/
3765:Washington Examiner
2415:. Such memes. Wow.
1762:Much keep, such wow
1529:http://dogepay.com/
142:by counting votes.
121:not a majority vote
3358:for all the help.
2856:does this matter?
2752:giving no evidence
2151:for more details.
1640:poisoning the well
1561:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
1405:article about weed
1403:. There can be an
637:Geek.com's article
56:They don't like it
4435:
4368:
4322:
3552:meeds GNG above.
3302:
3285:comment added by
2718:
2569:
2549:
2529:
1972:comment added by
1864:comment added by
1721:comment added by
1614:comment added by
1597:
1540:comment added by
1483:comment added by
1297:comment added by
1114:comment added by
831:bias against it?
580:comment added by
456:comment added by
437:This is not true.
223:
222:
219:
146:assume good faith
4494:
4477:
4433:
4429:
4427:
4366:
4362:
4360:
4315:
4312:
4228:Streisand effect
4147:Business Insider
3919:
3628:Business Insider
3468:Business Insider
3432:C. Scott Ananian
3352:Georgia Bulldogs
3328:
3326:
3321:
3301:
3279:
3112:. It's owned by
3040:
3037:Dear Celestia...
3031:
2969:
2966:
2960:
2957:
2851:
2775:
2770:
2736:
2731:
2700:
2667:
2659:
2658:
2649:- does not meet
2451:
2448:
2442:
2439:
2190:
2177:
1984:
1876:
1782:
1779:
1773:
1770:
1753:
1751:
1746:
1733:
1626:
1587:
1552:
1495:
1437:cryptocurrencies
1423:and there is no
1309:
1123:
592:
468:
344:
343:
329:
281:
269:
251:
217:
205:
189:
173:
154:
124:, but instead a
115:
108:
73:personal attacks
36:
4502:
4501:
4497:
4496:
4495:
4493:
4492:
4491:
4490:
4484:deletion review
4473:
4431:
4425:
4364:
4358:
4310:
4170:, and it's the
4168:media attention
4061:Merge or delete
3917:
3596:WP:ANTICIPATION
3578:, most notably
3324:
3319:
3317:
3280:
3173:Universo Online
3039:
3034:
3027:
3002:Delete or merge
2964:
2961:
2955:
2952:
2847:
2773:
2768:
2734:
2729:
2663:
2656:
2655:
2446:
2443:
2437:
2434:
2351:Delete or merge
2186:
2175:
1967:
1859:
1777:
1774:
1768:
1765:
1749:
1744:
1742:
1716:
1609:
1535:
1478:
1292:
1109:
575:
451:
286:
277:
242:
226:
207:
195:
179:
163:
150:sign your posts
106:
52:I don't like it
43:deletion review
32:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
4500:
4498:
4489:
4488:
4468:
4467:
4450:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
4442:
4441:
4440:
4439:
4426:KRAPENHOEFFER!
4393:
4392:
4372:
4359:KRAPENHOEFFER!
4350:
4349:
4335:cryptocurrency
4327:
4326:
4295:
4294:
4293:
4292:
4271:
4261:
4246:
4239:
4238:
4223:
4222:
4221:
4220:
4196:
4195:
4194:
4193:
4192:
4140:
4139:
4057:
4056:
4037:
4036:
4018:
4017:
3995:
3994:
3993:
3992:
3967:
3901:
3900:
3899:
3898:
3897:
3896:
3876:
3875:
3874:
3873:
3792:
3791:
3790:
3789:
3738:
3737:
3732:
3727:
3722:
3717:
3712:
3707:
3702:
3697:
3692:
3687:
3682:
3677:
3672:
3667:
3662:
3657:
3652:
3647:
3621:
3620:
3619:
3618:
3617:
3616:
3599:
3584:WP:PERSISTENCE
3554:Walter GĂśrlitz
3543:
3542:
3541:
3540:
3519:
3518:
3495:Cryptocurrency
3475:and his coin.
3464:
3463:
3453:Walter GĂśrlitz
3442:
3424:
3423:
3401:
3400:
3333:
3332:
3303:
3273:
3255:
3254:
3244:
3238:
3218:
3217:
3199:
3198:
3189:
3179:
3162:
3161:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3095:
3094:
3082:
3062:
3045:
3035:
3020:
2998:
2997:
2996:
2995:
2994:
2993:
2992:
2991:
2928:
2927:
2902:
2901:
2900:
2899:
2898:
2897:
2896:
2895:
2894:
2893:
2892:
2891:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2885:
2884:
2883:
2819:
2720:
2719:
2703:RainbowDashite
2690:RainbowDashite
2678:
2677:
2673:
2672:
2643:
2642:
2641:
2640:
2639:
2638:
2607:
2606:
2571:
2570:
2550:
2530:
2510:
2495:
2494:
2476:
2475:
2474:
2473:
2456:
2455:
2427:
2405:
2404:
2403:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2367:
2366:
2347:
2346:
2330:
2329:
2293:
2292:
2291:
2290:
2289:
2288:
2287:
2286:
2285:
2284:
2283:
2282:
2281:
2280:
2253:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2249:
2248:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2242:
2222:
2137:
2136:
2117:SomethingAwful
2108:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2103:
2065:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2031:
2030:
2023:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2006:
2005:
1986:
1985:
1960:
1959:
1944:
1943:
1916:
1915:
1897:
1896:
1878:
1877:
1866:209.160.73.168
1852:
1851:
1843:
1842:
1824:
1823:
1805:
1804:
1787:
1786:
1758:
1757:
1735:
1734:
1709:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1672:
1655:
1654:
1628:
1627:
1602:
1601:
1577:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1554:
1553:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1517:
1497:
1496:
1471:
1470:
1452:
1451:
1429:cryptocurrency
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1361:
1344:
1311:
1310:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1226:
1203:
1202:
1199:
1198:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1125:
1124:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1072:
1071:
1053:
1052:
1051:
1050:
1031:
1030:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
988:
987:
969:
968:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
904:
903:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
821:
820:
819:
798:
797:
786:Digital Trends
769:
768:
767:
766:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
572:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
541:
540:
539:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
501:
500:
490:
489:
488:
487:
458:68.190.183.161
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
442:
438:
432:
431:
430:
412:
411:
401:
400:
399:
398:
380:
379:
363:
347:
346:
283:
221:
220:
116:
105:
100:
48:
47:
27:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4499:
4487:
4485:
4481:
4476:
4470:
4469:
4466:
4462:
4458:
4455:
4451:
4447:
4444:
4443:
4438:
4434:
4428:
4422:
4419:
4416:
4412:
4411:
4410:
4406:
4402:
4398:
4395:
4394:
4391:
4388:
4386:
4384:
4381:
4376:
4373:
4371:
4367:
4361:
4355:
4352:
4351:
4348:
4344:
4340:
4336:
4332:
4329:
4328:
4325:
4321:
4318:
4314:
4313:
4308:
4307:
4300:
4297:
4296:
4291:
4286:
4285:
4284:
4280:
4276:
4272:
4270:
4266:
4262:
4260:
4256:
4252:
4251:atomicthumbsâ˝
4247:
4245:
4241:
4240:
4237:
4234:
4230:
4229:
4225:
4224:
4219:
4215:
4214:
4213:
4209:
4205:
4200:
4199:Merge for now
4197:
4191:
4187:
4186:WP:OTHERSTUFF
4184:In addition,
4183:
4182:
4181:
4177:
4173:
4169:
4165:
4160:
4156:
4152:
4148:
4144:
4143:
4142:
4141:
4138:
4135:
4132:
4131:
4126:
4122:
4118:
4114:
4110:
4106:
4102:
4098:
4094:
4090:
4086:
4082:
4078:
4074:
4070:
4066:
4062:
4059:
4058:
4055:
4051:
4047:
4042:
4039:
4038:
4035:
4031:
4027:
4023:
4020:
4019:
4016:
4012:
4008:
4007:Robert Walker
4004:
4000:
3997:
3996:
3991:
3987:
3983:
3982:
3981:
3977:
3973:
3968:
3966:
3962:
3958:
3954:
3951:
3950:
3949:
3948:
3945:
3941:
3937:
3933:
3929:
3925:
3924:
3921:
3920:
3913:
3909:
3905:
3895:
3891:
3887:
3886:Tractor Tyres
3882:
3881:
3880:
3879:
3878:
3877:
3872:
3868:
3864:
3863:
3862:
3858:
3854:
3850:
3849:
3848:
3847:
3843:
3839:
3838:Tractor Tyres
3835:
3831:
3827:
3826:
3822:
3818:
3817:Tractor Tyres
3813:
3809:
3808:
3804:
3800:
3796:
3788:
3784:
3780:
3776:
3775:
3774:
3770:
3766:
3762:
3761:
3760:
3759:
3755:
3751:
3747:
3743:
3736:
3733:
3731:
3728:
3726:
3723:
3721:
3718:
3716:
3713:
3711:
3708:
3706:
3703:
3701:
3698:
3696:
3693:
3691:
3688:
3686:
3683:
3681:
3678:
3676:
3673:
3671:
3668:
3666:
3663:
3661:
3658:
3656:
3653:
3651:
3648:
3646:
3643:
3642:
3641:
3639:
3635:
3633:
3629:
3625:
3615:
3611:
3607:
3603:
3597:
3593:
3589:
3585:
3581:
3577:
3573:
3569:
3565:
3564:
3563:
3559:
3555:
3550:
3547:
3546:
3545:
3544:
3539:
3535:
3532:
3527:
3523:
3522:
3521:
3520:
3517:
3513:
3509:
3505:
3500:
3496:
3492:
3488:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3482:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3469:
3462:
3458:
3454:
3450:
3446:
3443:
3441:
3437:
3433:
3429:
3426:
3425:
3422:
3418:
3414:
3410:
3406:
3403:
3402:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3390:
3385:
3382:
3381:
3380:
3379:
3376:
3372:
3368:
3364:
3359:
3357:
3356:Barrack Obama
3353:
3349:
3345:
3341:
3337:
3331:
3327:
3322:
3320:ViperSnake151
3315:
3311:
3307:
3304:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3277:
3274:
3272:
3268:
3264:
3260:
3257:
3256:
3253:
3250:
3245:
3243:
3239:
3236:
3232:
3228:
3227:
3226:
3224:
3223:
3216:
3212:
3208:
3204:
3201:
3200:
3197:
3194:
3190:
3188:
3184:
3180:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3169:
3168:
3166:
3160:
3157:
3153:
3149:
3145:
3142:I agree with
3141:
3138:
3132:
3129:
3125:
3124:
3123:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3106:
3105:
3104:
3101:
3097:
3096:
3093:
3090:
3086:
3083:
3081:
3077:
3073:
3070:
3066:
3063:
3061:
3057:
3053:
3049:
3046:
3044:
3041:
3038:
3032:
3030:
3024:
3021:
3019:
3015:
3011:
3010:Smite-Meister
3007:
3003:
3000:
2999:
2990:
2986:
2982:
2981:Smite-Meister
2978:
2974:
2973:
2972:
2968:
2967:
2959:
2958:
2950:
2946:
2945:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2935:Smite-Meister
2932:
2931:
2930:
2929:
2926:
2922:
2918:
2914:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2908:
2882:
2878:
2874:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2858:atomicthumbsâ˝
2855:
2850:
2845:
2844:
2841:
2840:
2839:
2835:
2834:
2833:
2829:
2825:
2824:atomicthumbsâ˝
2820:
2818:
2814:
2810:
2806:
2802:
2801:
2800:
2796:
2792:
2788:
2783:
2782:
2781:
2778:
2777:
2776:
2771:
2763:
2762:
2761:
2757:
2753:
2749:
2748:
2744:
2743:
2742:
2739:
2738:
2737:
2732:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2716:
2712:
2708:
2704:
2699:
2695:
2691:
2687:
2683:
2680:
2679:
2675:
2674:
2671:
2668:
2666:
2660:
2657:SagaciousPhil
2652:
2648:
2645:
2644:
2637:
2633:
2629:
2625:
2624:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2614:Smite-Meister
2611:
2610:
2609:
2608:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2593:
2591:
2589:
2587:
2585:
2583:
2581:
2579:
2576:
2573:
2572:
2568:
2564:
2560:
2556:
2551:
2548:
2544:
2540:
2536:
2531:
2528:
2524:
2520:
2516:
2511:
2509:
2505:
2501:
2497:
2496:
2493:
2489:
2485:
2481:
2478:
2477:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2459:
2458:
2457:
2454:
2450:
2449:
2441:
2440:
2433:start fresh.
2431:
2428:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2407:
2406:
2399:
2395:
2391:
2386:
2385:
2384:
2380:
2376:
2371:
2370:
2369:
2368:
2365:
2361:
2357:
2352:
2349:
2348:
2345:
2341:
2337:
2332:
2331:
2328:
2324:
2320:
2316:
2312:
2308:
2304:
2303:
2299:
2295:
2294:
2279:
2275:
2271:
2270:atomicthumbsâ˝
2267:
2266:
2265:
2264:
2263:
2262:
2261:
2260:
2259:
2258:
2257:
2256:
2255:
2254:
2241:
2237:
2236:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2226:atomicthumbsâ˝
2223:
2221:
2217:
2213:
2212:atomicthumbsâ˝
2209:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2193:
2191:
2189:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2178:
2176:Antonio LĂłpez
2172:
2168:
2165:Evidence you
2164:
2163:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2150:
2146:
2142:
2139:
2138:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2126:173.63.40.164
2123:
2118:
2113:
2110:
2109:
2102:
2098:
2094:
2090:
2089:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2076:
2074:
2072:
2069:
2068:
2067:
2066:
2061:
2058:
2055:
2054:
2048:
2047:
2046:
2042:
2038:
2033:
2032:
2028:
2025:
2024:
2019:
2016:
2015:
2010:
2009:
2008:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1991:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1974:67.82.116.221
1971:
1965:
1962:
1961:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:184.89.155.98
1930:
1926:
1921:
1918:
1917:
1914:
1910:
1906:
1902:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1883:
1880:
1879:
1875:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1857:
1854:
1853:
1848:
1845:
1844:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1829:
1826:
1825:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:198.72.165.96
1810:
1807:
1806:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1792:
1789:
1788:
1785:
1781:
1780:
1772:
1771:
1763:
1760:
1759:
1756:
1752:
1747:
1740:
1737:
1736:
1732:
1728:
1724:
1723:80.203.62.142
1720:
1714:
1711:
1710:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:atomicthumbsâ˝
1677:
1673:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1662:atomicthumbsâ˝
1659:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1653:
1649:
1645:
1644:68.81.104.224
1641:
1637:
1633:
1630:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1617:
1616:60.241.59.152
1613:
1607:
1604:
1603:
1600:
1595:
1591:
1586:
1582:
1579:
1578:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1562:
1558:
1557:
1556:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1543:
1539:
1534:
1530:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1516:
1512:
1508:
1505:
1501:
1500:
1499:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1476:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1461:
1460:fivexthethird
1457:
1454:
1453:
1450:
1447:
1444:
1443:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1399:
1398:
1389:
1385:
1381:
1380:184.89.155.98
1376:
1375:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1365:fivexthethird
1362:
1360:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1334:50.142.81.144
1330:
1329:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:atomicthumbsâ˝
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1299:50.142.81.144
1296:
1290:
1287:
1286:
1271:
1268:
1265:
1264:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1232:
1231:184.89.155.98
1227:
1225:
1222:
1218:
1217:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1207:atomicthumbsâ˝
1196:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1180:
1177:
1174:
1173:
1167:
1166:
1161:
1157:
1153:
1152:184.89.155.98
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1138:
1135:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1117:
1116:72.241.150.12
1113:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1081:atomicthumbsâ˝
1079:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1040:atomicthumbsâ˝
1038:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1014:
1013:
1008:
1004:
1000:
999:atomicthumbsâ˝
996:
992:
991:
990:
989:
986:
982:
978:
977:184.89.155.98
974:
971:
970:
967:
964:
960:
956:
952:
944:
941:
938:
937:
931:
930:
929:
926:
922:
921:
920:
916:
912:
911:atomicthumbsâ˝
908:
907:
906:
905:
902:
899:
895:
892:
889:
886:
883:
880:
876:
873:
872:
865:
861:
857:
853:
852:
851:
848:
844:
843:
842:
839:
836:
835:
830:
829:
822:
818:
814:
810:
805:
802:
801:
800:
799:
796:
795:
791:
787:
783:
782:The Daily Dot
779:
775:
771:
770:
757:
754:
751:
750:
745:
741:
740:
739:
735:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
709:
705:
701:
700:atomicthumbsâ˝
697:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
679:
675:
671:
670:50.53.107.121
668:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
650:
646:
642:
641:atomicthumbsâ˝
638:
635:
634:
633:
629:
625:
624:50.53.107.121
621:
617:
616:
615:
611:
607:
606:atomicthumbsâ˝
603:
599:
594:
593:
591:
587:
583:
582:80.203.62.142
579:
573:
570:
564:
561:
558:
557:
552:
551:
548:
547:
546:
542:
536:
535:
534:
530:
524:
521:
518:
517:
512:
508:
507:
505:
504:
503:
502:
499:
495:
492:
491:
486:
483:
480:
479:
474:
470:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
449:
448:
439:
436:
435:
433:
429:
426:
423:
422:
417:
414:
413:
408:
407:
405:
404:
403:
402:
397:
394:
391:
390:
384:
383:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
365:
364:
361:
360:
356:
352:
351:atomicthumbsâ˝
342:
338:
335:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
314:
311:
308:
305:
302:
299:
296:
292:
289:
288:Find sources:
284:
280:
276:
273:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
246:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
215:
211:
203:
199:
193:
187:
183:
177:
171:
167:
161:
157:
153:
151:
147:
141:
137:
136:
131:
127:
123:
122:
117:
114:
110:
109:
104:
101:
99:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
61:
57:
54:or similarly
53:
46:
44:
40:
35:
29:
28:
26:
19:
4474:
4471:
4445:
4421:masturbation
4396:
4374:
4353:
4330:
4305:
4302:
4298:
4231:anybody? --
4226:
4198:
4171:
4167:
4163:
4128:
4060:
4040:
4021:
3998:
3952:
3928:Keep for now
3927:
3926:
3916:
3903:
3902:
3833:
3829:
3828:
3811:
3810:
3794:
3793:
3745:
3741:
3739:
3637:
3636:
3623:
3622:
3601:
3592:WP:SENSATION
3571:
3567:
3548:
3533:
3525:
3498:
3490:
3486:
3466:
3465:
3444:
3427:
3409:filelakeshoe
3404:
3387:
3383:
3360:
3335:
3334:
3314:god dang it!
3305:
3281:â Preceding
3275:
3258:
3231:Wired Italia
3220:
3219:
3202:
3164:
3163:
3139:
3109:
3084:
3064:
3047:
3036:
3028:
3022:
3001:
2963:
2954:
2933:Not really.
2912:
2903:
2853:
2786:
2766:
2765:
2755:
2751:
2746:
2745:
2727:
2726:
2681:
2664:
2646:
2574:
2479:
2445:
2436:
2429:
2408:
2350:
2334:acceptable.
2297:
2296:
2187:
2145:meatpuppetry
2140:
2111:
2070:
2051:
2026:
2012:
1995:108.45.75.50
1989:
1968:â Preceding
1963:
1919:
1900:
1881:
1860:â Preceding
1855:
1846:
1827:
1808:
1776:
1767:
1761:
1738:
1717:â Preceding
1712:
1674:RSN post is
1631:
1610:â Preceding
1605:
1580:
1542:68.3.196.152
1536:â Preceding
1523:
1479:â Preceding
1474:
1455:
1440:
1400:
1351:
1347:
1293:â Preceding
1288:
1261:
1170:
1110:â Preceding
1056:
1015:
972:
934:
874:
832:
827:
825:
803:
773:
772:
747:
743:
576:â Preceding
554:
514:
510:
493:
476:
472:
452:â Preceding
419:
387:
367:
362:
348:
336:
330:
322:
315:
309:
303:
297:
287:
274:
213:
201:
192:sockpuppetry
185:
174:; suspected
169:
155:
143:
139:
133:
125:
119:
84:
60:meatpuppetry
49:
33:
30:
25:
4339:VinceSamios
4233:John Reaves
4105:Digitalcoin
4085:Feathercoin
3936:Feathercoin
3812:Strong keep
3630:' article.
3367:WP:NEWSBLOG
3348:Jimmy Wales
3006:Doge_(meme)
2809:Mark Arsten
2713:) has made
2409:Much delete
2311:Doge_(meme)
2302:Doge_(meme)
2153:Mark Arsten
2093:Mark Arsten
2027:Speedy Keep
1886:77.98.70.62
1585:Rezonansowy
1431:itself and
778:Geekosystem
313:free images
75:, off-site
63:satisfying
4454:WP:Notable
4275:Breadblade
4172:big factor
3957:TeaDrinker
3932:WP:NOTNEWS
3580:WP:INDEPTH
3491:Very merge
3287:Derstacker
3203:Weak keep.
3069:WP:ACRONYM
2917:Mike Young
2463:Breadblade
2336:Breadblade
2319:Breadblade
2315:projecting
2141:Admin note
1949:Breadblade
1794:Breadblade
1694:Breadblade
1564:Breadblade
1507:Breadblade
1247:Breadblade
1061:Guineapigs
856:Breadblade
790:WP:NOTABLE
598:WP:NEWSORG
511:definitely
126:discussion
81:harassment
4480:talk page
4457:Retardist
4401:Wincent77
4354:very keep
4204:Uberstadt
4155:The Verge
4113:Terracoin
4081:Worldcoin
4046:Bigbadman
4026:Haseo9999
3832:. Can we
3779:Kyleshome
3750:Kyleshome
3473:Shiba Inu
3344:snowstorm
3306:Very keep
3263:Pichu0102
3222:Wired.com
3144:RadioYeti
3118:SB Nation
3114:Vox Media
3072:RadioYeti
3048:Very keep
3023:Much keep
2684:- As per
2559:⢠Gene93k
2539:⢠Gene93k
2519:⢠Gene93k
2484:InShaneee
2417:bobrayner
2298:Delete or
2173:as well.
1739:many keep
1642:though!)
811:and also
696:WP:SIGCOV
182:canvassed
176:canvassed
135:consensus
39:talk page
4482:or in a
4320:Contribs
4101:Freicoin
4093:Novacoin
4089:Dogecoin
4077:Namecoin
4069:Litecoin
3944:Danski14
3940:Novacoin
3853:Pilotbob
3799:Pilotbob
3632:CGlassey
3606:Azurfrog
3588:WP:EVENT
3576:WP:EVENT
3508:Azurfrog
3504:WP:EVENT
3310:snowball
3295:contribs
3283:unsigned
3183:AdevÄrul
3052:Jørgen88
2956:Konveyor
2873:Pilotbob
2711:contribs
2628:Pilotbob
2500:Pilotbob
2438:Konveyor
2390:Fribbler
2356:Fribbler
2122:Dogecoin
2071:Addendum
1970:unsigned
1862:unsigned
1832:Rekakaka
1769:Konveyor
1745:TORTOISE
1719:unsigned
1612:unsigned
1594:contribs
1538:unsigned
1481:unsigned
1348:asserted
1295:unsigned
1112:unsigned
1020:Tim Bray
828:TROLLISH
826:trollish
824:trollish
578:unsigned
454:unsigned
272:View log
228:Dogecoin
214:username
208:{{subst:
202:username
196:{{subst:
186:username
180:{{subst:
170:username
164:{{subst:
103:Dogecoin
41:or in a
4418:acts of
4415:notable
4311:Hamster
4125:WP:DUST
4121:Mincoin
4117:BBQcoin
4097:Devcoin
4065:Bitcoin
3830:Comment
3549:Comment
3497:: Much
3110:to-date
3085:Comment
3029:ăWoonaă
2795:WP:NPOV
2769:Richard
2730:Richard
2430:Comment
2375:Acebulf
2188:Prodego
2079:Acebulf
2037:Acebulf
1632:Comment
1352:proving
1346:You've
1057:Neutral
1016:Neutral
774:Neutral
602:WP:HITS
494:Comment
416:WP:HITS
368:Comment
319:WPÂ refs
307:scholar
245:protect
240:history
178:users:
69:merging
4397:Delete
4265:WP:GNG
4176:WP:GNG
4157:, and
4109:Ixcoin
4073:PPCoin
3986:WP:NPA
3918:br100x
3910:&
3867:WP:GNG
3834:please
3602:launch
3531:WP:GNG
3526:delete
3487:Delete
3449:WP:GNG
3371:WP:RSN
3354:, and
3350:, the
3207:Pmsyyz
3156:(talk)
3152:Yacoin
2977:WP:GNG
2791:WP:COL
2686:WP:GNG
2682:Delete
2651:WP:GNG
2647:Delete
2596:Sloane
2480:Delete
2307:WP:GNG
2124:page.
1636:WP:RSN
1504:WP:GNG
1435:major
1356:Mathmo
1221:Mathmo
1134:Mathmo
963:Mathmo
925:Mathmo
898:Mathmo
847:Mathmo
784:, and
744:Where?
730:kiaton
538:11,716
291:Google
249:delete
77:outing
4306:Super
4151:Wired
3746:feels
3325:Talk
2411:. No
1905:BureX
1791:WP:GF
1750:WRATH
1244:WP:GF
441:time.
334:JSTOR
295:books
279:Stats
266:views
258:watch
254:links
156:Note:
87:. --
16:<
4461:talk
4446:Keep
4432:TALK
4405:talk
4375:Keep
4365:TALK
4343:talk
4331:Keep
4317:Talk
4299:Keep
4279:talk
4255:talk
4208:talk
4119:and
4050:talk
4041:Keep
4030:talk
4022:Keep
4011:talk
3999:Keep
3976:talk
3961:talk
3953:Keep
3938:and
3904:Keep
3890:talk
3857:talk
3842:talk
3821:talk
3803:talk
3795:Keep
3783:talk
3754:talk
3742:feel
3638:Keep
3624:Keep
3610:talk
3582:and
3558:talk
3512:talk
3506:. --
3499:Keep
3457:talk
3445:Keep
3436:talk
3428:Keep
3405:Keep
3394:talk
3389:Cirt
3384:Keep
3363:Vice
3291:talk
3276:Keep
3267:talk
3259:Keep
3211:talk
3148:talk
3140:Keep
3076:talk
3065:Keep
3056:talk
3014:talk
2985:talk
2965:Belt
2939:talk
2921:talk
2913:Keep
2877:talk
2862:talk
2828:talk
2813:talk
2793:and
2707:talk
2694:talk
2665:Chat
2632:talk
2618:talk
2600:talk
2575:Keep
2563:talk
2543:talk
2523:talk
2504:talk
2488:talk
2467:talk
2447:Belt
2421:talk
2394:talk
2379:talk
2360:talk
2340:talk
2323:talk
2274:talk
2230:talk
2216:talk
2167:say?
2157:talk
2149:here
2130:talk
2112:Keep
2097:talk
2083:talk
2041:talk
1999:talk
1990:Keep
1978:talk
1964:Keep
1953:talk
1937:talk
1909:talk
1901:Keep
1890:talk
1882:Keep
1870:talk
1856:Keep
1850:2013
1847:Keep
1836:talk
1828:Keep
1817:talk
1809:Keep
1798:talk
1778:Belt
1727:talk
1713:Keep
1698:talk
1684:talk
1676:here
1666:talk
1648:talk
1620:talk
1606:Keep
1590:talk
1581:Keep
1568:talk
1546:talk
1524:Keep
1511:talk
1489:talk
1475:Keep
1464:talk
1456:Keep
1384:talk
1369:talk
1338:talk
1323:talk
1303:talk
1289:Keep
1251:talk
1235:talk
1211:talk
1156:talk
1120:talk
1105:here
1103:and
1101:Here
1085:talk
1065:talk
1044:talk
1024:talk
1003:talk
981:talk
973:Keep
915:talk
875:Keep
860:talk
813:here
804:Keep
734:talk
704:talk
674:talk
645:talk
628:talk
610:talk
586:talk
473:less
462:talk
386:Pot.
376:here
372:here
355:talk
327:FENS
301:news
262:logs
236:talk
232:edit
93:talk
85:keep
79:and
4178:.
4134:Saw
4130:Zig
3988:?
3771:.
3598:).
3594:or
3568:may
3493:to
3489:or
3479:.
3181:An
2854:how
2413:GNG
2171:COI
2057:Saw
2053:Zig
2018:Saw
2014:Zig
1446:Saw
1442:Zig
1433:the
1267:Saw
1263:Zig
1176:Saw
1172:Zig
940:Saw
936:Zig
838:Saw
834:Zig
815:.
753:Saw
749:Zig
604:).
560:Saw
556:Zig
520:Saw
516:Zig
482:Saw
478:Zig
425:Saw
421:Zig
393:Saw
389:Zig
341:TWL
270:â (
210:csp
206:or
198:csm
166:spa
140:not
89:KTC
65:GNG
4463:)
4407:)
4345:)
4281:)
4257:)
4210:)
4153:,
4149:,
4115:,
4111:,
4107:,
4103:,
4099:,
4095:,
4091:,
4087:,
4083:,
4079:,
4075:,
4071:,
4067:,
4052:)
4044:--
4032:)
4013:)
3978:)
3963:)
3892:)
3859:)
3844:)
3823:)
3805:)
3785:)
3767:,
3756:)
3612:)
3560:)
3514:)
3459:)
3451:.
3438:)
3419:)
3415:/
3396:)
3316:)
3297:)
3293:â˘
3269:)
3233::
3213:)
3078:)
3058:)
3016:)
2987:)
2979:.
2941:)
2923:)
2879:)
2864:)
2830:)
2815:)
2807:.
2774:BB
2735:BB
2709:â˘
2701:â
2696:)
2661:-
2634:)
2620:)
2602:)
2594:--
2565:)
2557:.
2545:)
2537:.
2525:)
2517:.
2506:)
2490:)
2469:)
2423:)
2396:)
2381:)
2362:)
2342:)
2325:)
2276:)
2232:)
2218:)
2159:)
2132:)
2099:)
2085:)
2043:)
2001:)
1980:)
1955:)
1939:)
1911:)
1892:)
1872:)
1838:)
1819:)
1800:)
1729:)
1700:)
1686:)
1678:.
1668:)
1650:)
1622:)
1592:â˘
1570:)
1548:)
1531:-
1513:)
1491:)
1466:)
1386:)
1371:)
1340:)
1325:)
1305:)
1253:)
1237:)
1213:)
1193:I
1158:)
1122:)
1087:)
1067:)
1046:)
1026:)
1005:)
983:)
961:)
917:)
862:)
780:,
736:)
706:)
698:.
676:)
647:)
630:)
612:)
588:)
464:)
357:)
321:)
264:|
260:|
256:|
252:|
247:|
243:|
238:|
234:|
216:}}
204:}}
194::
188:}}
172:}}
162::
95:)
4459:(
4403:(
4383:E
4380:Y
4341:(
4303:~
4277:(
4253:(
4206:(
4048:(
4028:(
4009:(
3974:(
3959:(
3888:(
3855:(
3840:(
3819:(
3801:(
3781:(
3752:(
3608:(
3556:(
3510:(
3455:(
3434:(
3417:c
3413:t
3411:(
3392:(
3289:(
3265:(
3237:.
3209:(
3146:(
3074:(
3054:(
3012:(
2983:(
2937:(
2919:(
2875:(
2871:-
2860:(
2826:(
2811:(
2705:(
2692:(
2630:(
2616:(
2598:(
2561:(
2541:(
2521:(
2502:(
2486:(
2465:(
2419:(
2392:(
2377:(
2358:(
2338:(
2321:(
2272:(
2228:(
2214:(
2155:(
2128:(
2095:(
2081:(
2039:(
1997:(
1976:(
1951:(
1935:(
1907:(
1888:(
1868:(
1834:(
1815:(
1796:(
1725:(
1696:(
1682:(
1664:(
1646:(
1618:(
1596:)
1588:(
1566:(
1544:(
1509:(
1487:(
1462:(
1382:(
1367:(
1336:(
1321:(
1301:(
1249:(
1233:(
1209:(
1154:(
1118:(
1083:(
1063:(
1042:(
1022:(
1001:(
979:(
913:(
858:(
742:'
732:(
702:(
672:(
643:(
626:(
608:(
584:(
460:(
353:(
345:)
337:¡
331:¡
323:¡
316:¡
310:¡
304:¡
298:¡
293:(
285:(
282:)
275:¡
268:)
230:(
218:.
212:|
200:|
184:|
168:|
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
