274:
a) had significant roles in multiple notable (other) productions: of which the Mario video game series certainly qualifies as a "notable production" and her voice roles in these games are certainly significant; if that is not enough,
281:
c) made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment: which is again true for
Dolores Rogers who has clearly made prolific and unique contributions to the video game voice over field of
148:
220:
145:
199:
127:
181:
343:
a) indicates that she should certainly be mentioned in the articles for the works she has appeared in. However, this is not a "significant role".
278:
b) a large fan base or a significant "cult" following: for which the Mario gamers certainly have a cult following; if that is not enough, then:
94:
89:
17:
98:
154:
of this living person. No logical place for a merge or redirection. (Note that this is different from the artist of the same name.)
81:
349:
c) her list of acting roles does not suggest anything unique or innovative; 10 roles between 2001 and 2006 is not "prolific".
411:
36:
308:
Lacks the appropriate coverage from reliable sources, as nominator demonstrated, and doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER.
336:(as her primary voice acting role). Verifiablity is the main issue here. Also, of the points mentioned by Esasus:
410:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
285:
Clearly, for the reasons outlines above, Dolores Rogers is notable per WP:ENTERTAINER, and therefore she is a
266:
245:
396:
382:
363:
324:
298:
255:
230:
209:
188:
170:
63:
85:
359:
240:
158:
The lone source added after the prod removal is from a fan-made wiki and hence is not reliable per the
378:
227:
206:
185:
167:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
135:
355:
294:
354:
So as far as I can tell, the article fails the notability guideline on all three counts.
159:
141:
77:
69:
289:. I consider IMDB.com to be a reliable secondary source for an entertainer's credits.
163:
151:
392:
374:
314:
56:
115:
346:
b) WP:ENTERTAINER asks that the person has a large fan base, not the work itself.
290:
333:
49:
404:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
265:- Dolores Rogers more than passes the notability threshold of
251:
309:
221:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
122:
111:
107:
103:
200:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
312:is all the mention of her Wiki really requires.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
414:). No further edits should be made to this page.
182:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
215:
194:
219:: This debate has been included in the
198:: This debate has been included in the
180:: This debate has been included in the
138:. I reiterate my reason for prodding:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
373:for reasons well-outlined above.
1:
383:14:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
364:10:43, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
325:04:19, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
299:00:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
256:23:10, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
231:21:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
210:21:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
189:21:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
171:21:59, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
269:which requires that she has:
431:
142:reliable secondary sources
397:21:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
160:reliable source guideline
150:) that can establish any
64:06:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
407:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
334:Bowser_Jr#Bowser_Jr.
164:verifiability policy
140:I cannot find any
44:The result was
390:per Marasmusine.
233:
224:
212:
203:
191:
60:
422:
409:
323:
321:
248:
243:
225:
204:
176:
125:
119:
101:
61:
58:
54:
34:
430:
429:
425:
424:
423:
421:
420:
419:
418:
412:deletion review
405:
332:or redirect to
315:
313:
246:
241:
121:
92:
76:
73:
59:clamation point
57:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
428:
426:
417:
416:
400:
399:
395:
385:
367:
366:
352:
351:
350:
347:
344:
338:
337:
327:
302:
301:
283:
282:entertainment.
279:
276:
271:
270:
267:WP:ENTERTAINER
259:
258:
234:
213:
192:
132:
131:
78:Dolores Rogers
72:
70:Dolores Rogers
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
427:
415:
413:
408:
402:
401:
398:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
372:
369:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
348:
345:
342:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
328:
326:
322:
320:
319:
311:
307:
304:
303:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
277:
273:
272:
268:
264:
261:
260:
257:
254:
253:
249:
244:
238:
235:
232:
229:
222:
218:
214:
211:
208:
201:
197:
193:
190:
187:
183:
179:
175:
174:
173:
172:
169:
165:
161:
156:
155:
153:
149:
146:
143:
137:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
406:
403:
387:
370:
329:
317:
316:
305:
286:
262:
250:
236:
216:
195:
177:
157:
139:
133:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
356:Marasmusine
287:Strong Keep
263:Strong Keep
152:notability
144:(as shown
134:Contested
239:per nom.
393:decltype
375:Adam Zel
318:Mbinebri
228:MuZemike
207:MuZemike
186:MuZemike
168:MuZemike
128:View log
162:or the
95:protect
90:history
388:Delete
371:Delete
330:Delete
306:Delete
291:Esasus
237:Delete
123:delete
99:delete
46:delete
275:then;
247:drink
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
379:talk
360:talk
310:This
295:talk
242:Lets
217:Note
196:Note
178:Note
147:and
136:prod
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
252:Tea
381:)
362:)
297:)
223:.
202:.
184:.
166:.
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
48:.
377:(
358:(
293:(
226:—
205:—
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
52:X
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.