454:
398:. The key question at this juncture is whether one or the other of these campaigns is the one people will look for now and into the future. The 2000 campaign -- for a third party shot which never materialized -- was already much shorter and less consequential than the current campaign. No need to inflate its import. Pointing this to the politics section of the bio works just as well.
583:. And when I created this page as a redirect to the current campaign article, there wasn't one for the 2000 campaign. I don't doubt the earlier campaign is notable, but count me pretty skeptical that it has anything like parity with the current one. Yeah, actually, the more I think about it, the more I want to say
254:
Well, obviously this isn't going to be withdrawn. I think it's pretty clear there isn't going to a consensus to delete, mainly for the common sense reason that typing "Donald Trump presidential campaign" (or linking to it) should get the reader somewhere. Personally, I don't much mind between keeping
779:
I understand the reasoning behind this nomination, as his 2016 campaign is far more widespread and notable than his 2000 Reform Party run. However, his 2000 campaign is also notable. So my recommendation is to redirect this article to his 2016 campaign since thats what the majority of the people are
534:
makes it hard for people to find these two pages on the topic, which is the opposite of what we aim for. If the articles themselves are not worth it, that's a discussion for elsewhere, a merge/redirect to Donald Trump#Politics. While the articles on these precise topics exist, we should make them
430:
I really don't think this page is necessary. Searching "Donald Trump presidential campaign" will show only 3 results, which are links to both his campaigns and then the disambiguation page. This would be the same with all the other presidential campaign DAB pages I've nominated for deletion. If
239:
only applies if one article is the primary topic and the page therefore has "(disambiguation)" in the title, which is obviously not the case here. The last sentence if TWODABS reads "If neither of the two meanings is primary, then a normal disambiguation page is used at the base name."
182:
535:
easy to find. Additionally if it's the 2016 campaign you're interested in, there's a bit of scrolling down before you get there from that link, which isn't very user-friendly. Would you consider withdrawing nomination?
574:
That being said, there's nothing wrong with this page in particular assuming there isn't a primary topic between the two campaigns. I think you can make a pretty strong argument that the current campaign
485:: TWODABS does not say there should be no disambiguation pages with only two entries: it refers to cases where there is a primary topic plus one other, which can be better handled by a hatnote.
176:
373:
108:
103:
112:
655:
135:
95:
351:
621:
These are the only ones it discusses. It could be redirected, but then the 2016 page would need to be moved to the primary page, and a hatnote to earlier campaign added.
704:
I originally closed as Snow Keep as nominator's AFDs so far have been obvious Keeps however in this case I clearly should've left it open so I've reopened it. –
142:
686:(no primary topic, but redirect to a subject that covers both articles) explain why a straight-up keep is better than any of those suggestions? Thanks, --
307:
doesn't apply, but it's still an unnecessary disambiguation due to the fact that the same information can be found in more detail at Trump's biography. --
255:
the dab as is or redirecting to the 2016 article and adding a hatnote to it – if I must be counted one way or the other though, I guess redirecting as a
675:
588:
326:
51:
580:
99:
197:
164:
619:
Some disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title list only two meanings, one of them being the primary topic. In such cases...
748:
780:
looking for when they land on this disambiguation, and add a hatnote there informing readers about the existence of his 2000 campaign.
800:
767:
738:
695:
630:
604:
544:
511:
471:
449:
407:
387:
365:
342:
316:
291:
272:
249:
229:
91:
83:
77:
158:
755:
154:
17:
561:
and a non-notable song, as opposed to a hatnote, that would be wrong, but it would be just as wrong if I moved the page to
453:
204:
431:
someone is looking for Trump's campaigns and they search "Donald Trump presidential campaign...", the search bar already
579:
primary, however. The 2000 campaign was a blip—there was only one highly notable third-party campaign that year, and it
70:
747:
I think that's the idea behind Tavix's redirect proposal. Such an article wouldn't really belong at the current title.
725:- I'd say the article should be expanded to include all his flirtations with running for president (2012, 1988, etc). -
528:
disambiguation pages with "(disambiguation)" in the title list only two meanings, one of them being the primary topic
819:
330:
256:
40:
554:
170:
654:
situation if rectified (ie: in this case, the primary topic would be Trump's 2016 election, which would create
447:
227:
679:
592:
815:
793:
646:
in this situation, what they usually actually mean is that they think there is primary topic that would
566:
36:
519:
436:
216:
491:
If neither of the two meanings is primary, then a normal disambiguation page is used at the base name.
671:
287:
190:
462:
Yeah, but come on, we all know that 99 times in a hundred they'll be seeking the current venture.
733:
467:
403:
377:
355:
674:
situation, could those who !voted "keep" without addressing the redirect suggestions to either
565:
and made the base title a disambiguation page. (I'll start a discussion about this language at
643:
639:
614:
562:
523:
486:
304:
268:
245:
236:
213:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
814:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
786:
663:
651:
626:
540:
64:
263:, that seems least likely to help the reader get to the article and information they want.
502:
283:
763:
727:
600:
463:
418:
399:
382:
360:
683:
531:
425:
300:
264:
260:
241:
129:
622:
536:
58:
687:
334:
308:
435:
both of his campaigns. A disambiguation page would therefore be unnecessary.
558:
493:
259:
would be my slight preference. I disagree with the idea of redirecting to
759:
596:
553:
applies to dabs with (disambiguation) in the title. Sure, if we had a
55:. Hatnote added to 2016 article for 2000 article, as suggested below.
530:, which doesn't fit this. Perfectly valid dab page. A redirect to
452:
808:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
333:(I thought I had already mentioned this, but apparently not.) --
642:
horse to death here, but usually when I see someone cite
125:
121:
117:
189:
374:
656:
Donald Trump presidential campaign (disambiguation)
526:? If you click on it, you'll see it only refers to
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
822:). No further edits should be made to this page.
352:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
549:I don't think it's quite right to say TWODABS
203:
8:
372:Note: This debate has been included in the
350:Note: This debate has been included in the
371:
349:
676:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016
589:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016
327:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016
52:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016
490:
7:
749:Donald Trump presidential campaign
595:. No need to delete either way. --
92:Donald Trump presidential campaign
84:Donald Trump presidential campaign
24:
756:Political career of Donald Trump
282:not seeing a problem with this.
670:we're actually talking about a
325:I'd also support a redirect to
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
235:I'd suggest withdrawing this.
1:
684:Donald Trump#Political career
532:Donald Trump#Political career
301:Donald Trump#Political career
261:Donald Trump#Political career
801:06:05, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
768:00:26, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
739:21:30, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
715:20:58, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
696:14:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
631:14:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
605:14:39, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
545:12:57, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
512:10:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
472:06:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
450:06:15, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
408:05:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
388:05:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
366:05:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
343:00:38, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
317:04:07, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
292:04:02, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
273:16:08, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
250:03:51, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
230:03:47, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
78:16:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
658:once redirected there, and
839:
555:Chingford (disambiguation)
811:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
458:
456:
638:: We're beating the
459:
331:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT
257:WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT
784:
737:
563:Chingford, London
390:
368:
76:
830:
813:
798:
791:
782:
731:
714:
709:
693:
557:that listed the
509:
500:
457:See what I mean?
443:
442:
429:
422:
385:
380:
363:
358:
340:
314:
223:
222:
208:
207:
193:
145:
133:
115:
73:
67:
56:
34:
838:
837:
833:
832:
831:
829:
828:
827:
826:
820:deletion review
809:
794:
787:
710:
705:
688:
680:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
593:WP:PRIMARYTOPIC
522:, did you mean
503:
494:
440:
439:
433:clearly notates
423:
416:
383:
378:
361:
356:
335:
309:
220:
219:
150:
141:
106:
90:
87:
71:
65:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
836:
834:
825:
824:
804:
803:
773:
772:
771:
770:
754:, perhaps, or
742:
741:
719:
718:
717:
716:
699:
698:
633:
608:
607:
581:wasn't Trump's
571:
570:
547:
514:
479:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
411:
410:
392:
391:
369:
347:
346:
345:
320:
319:
294:
277:
276:
275:
211:
210:
147:
86:
81:
59:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
835:
823:
821:
817:
812:
806:
805:
802:
799:
797:
792:
790:
785:
778:
775:
774:
769:
765:
761:
757:
753:
752:
746:
745:
744:
743:
740:
735:
730:
729:
724:
721:
720:
713:
708:
703:
702:
701:
700:
697:
694:
691:
685:
681:
677:
673:
672:WP:DABPRIMARY
669:
665:
662:would be the
661:
657:
653:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
632:
628:
624:
620:
616:
613:
610:
609:
606:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
582:
578:
573:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:London suburb
556:
552:
548:
546:
542:
538:
533:
529:
525:
521:
518:
515:
513:
510:
508:
507:
501:
499:
498:
492:
488:
484:
481:
480:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
455:
451:
448:
446:
445:
444:
434:
427:
420:
415:
414:
413:
412:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
389:
386:
381:
375:
370:
367:
364:
359:
353:
348:
344:
341:
338:
332:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
315:
312:
306:
302:
298:
295:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
226:
225:
224:
215:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
144:
140:
137:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
85:
82:
80:
79:
74:
68:
62:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
810:
807:
795:
788:
781:
776:
750:
726:
722:
711:
706:
689:
667:
659:
647:
635:
618:
611:
584:
576:
550:
527:
520:CatcherStorm
516:
505:
504:
496:
495:
482:
441:CatcherStorm
438:
437:
432:
395:
336:
310:
296:
279:
221:CatcherStorm
218:
217:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
138:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
177:free images
666:. Since I
644:WP:TWODABS
640:WP:TWODABS
615:WP:TWODABS
524:WP:TWODABS
487:WP:TWODABS
305:WP:TWODABS
237:WP:TWODABS
214:WP:TWODABS
66:have a cup
816:talk page
783:→ Call me
664:WP:TWODAB
652:WP:TWODAB
567:WT:MOSDAB
284:Legacypac
37:talk page
818:or in a
777:Redirect
728:mattbuck
617:starts:
585:redirect
464:Pandeist
419:Pandeist
400:Pandeist
297:Redirect
136:View log
39:or in a
723:Comment
668:believe
636:Comment
612:Comment
426:Jenks24
396:Support
265:Jenks24
242:Jenks24
183:WP refs
171:scholar
109:protect
104:history
796:Nation
648:create
623:Boleyn
537:Boleyn
489:says:
155:Google
113:delete
60:Coffee
707:Davey
682:) or
198:JSTOR
159:books
143:Stats
130:views
122:watch
118:links
72:beans
16:<
789:Razr
764:talk
758:. --
734:Talk
712:2010
692:avix
660:that
627:talk
601:talk
551:only
541:talk
517:Keep
483:Keep
468:talk
404:talk
339:avix
329:per
313:avix
288:talk
280:Keep
269:talk
246:talk
191:FENS
165:news
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
760:BDD
597:BDD
591:as
587:to
497:Pam
379:sst
357:sst
299:to
205:TWL
134:– (
75://
69://
63://
766:)
650:a
629:)
603:)
577:is
569:.)
543:)
470:)
406:)
376:.
354:.
303:.
290:)
271:)
248:)
185:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
57:—
762:(
751:s
736:)
732:(
690:T
678:(
625:(
599:(
539:(
506:D
466:(
428::
424:@
421::
417:@
402:(
384:✈
362:✈
337:T
311:T
286:(
267:(
244:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
139:·
132:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.