Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Doomsday Called Off - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

130:- I found at least a couple of independent reviews from reliable sources, but the article is clearly a stub and it should be annotated with citations. Also, FWIW, this topic (global warming) is somewhat contentious - I suggest we error on the side of caution to make sure all sides of the debate are heard from. 270:
currently are not being considered for deletion from Knowledge (XXG). Why, because those are notable or useful? A Google search on the title of the film in question yields hundreds if not thousands of hits. Most anyone versed in the prolific debate on global warming has an opinion on the film. Why
156:- You can watch it online at Google Video. It's not a particularly good documentary, IMO, but I can't see any reason not to keep the article. It could easily be expanded to present the points that are mentioned in the movie. 110: 83: 78: 87: 209:
883k google hits says you forgot to put quotes around it. If you can find any notable reviews of it, please put them onto the article page
70: 290: 17: 262:- It is said that it's "Non-notable; no useful text (e.g. contributors unnamed, arguments not given)." But articles on the movies, 286: 315: 36: 299: 254: 239: 227: 213: 204: 192: 180: 160: 146: 134: 121: 52: 210: 118: 188:
for lack of assertion of notability, the only possible assertion is propaganda from the station that aired it.
314:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
74: 168:, no prejudice against the topic, but we have no sources establishing notability of this particular program. 66: 58: 49: 278: 272: 282: 177: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
296: 189: 157: 143: 169: 251: 271:
not allow the next newcomer to that debate begin to form his or her own opinion here? --
224: 173: 131: 104: 236: 248: 117:
Non-notable; no useful text (e.g. contributors unnamed, arguments not given)
142:
Please provide those sources and prove Bill wrong, if you wouldn't mind.
201: 308:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
170:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory of argumentation in debates
100: 96: 92: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 200:883,000 google hits says this is a bad faith nom-- 318:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 223:per nom; no assertion of notability. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 264:Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure 24: 235:per nom and above, no notability 1: 335: 311:Please do not modify it. 300:07:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 275:02:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC) 255:11:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 240:11:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 228:05:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC) 214:21:52, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 205:21:47, 13 May 2007 (UTC) 193:07:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 181:05:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 161:05:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 147:07:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC) 135:20:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 122:19:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC) 53:14:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 291:few or no other edits 247:per nom: garbagey. -- 293:outside this topic. 211:William M. Connolley 119:William M. Connolley 268:Transylvania 6-5000 67:Doomsday Called Off 59:Doomsday Called Off 302: 294: 326: 313: 295: 276: 108: 90: 34: 334: 333: 329: 328: 327: 325: 324: 323: 322: 316:deletion review 309: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 332: 330: 321: 320: 304: 303: 257: 242: 230: 218: 217: 216: 195: 183: 163: 151: 150: 149: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 331: 319: 317: 312: 306: 305: 301: 298: 292: 288: 284: 280: 274: 269: 265: 261: 258: 256: 253: 250: 246: 243: 241: 238: 234: 231: 229: 226: 222: 219: 215: 212: 208: 207: 206: 203: 199: 196: 194: 191: 187: 184: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 162: 159: 155: 152: 148: 145: 141: 138: 137: 136: 133: 129: 126: 125: 124: 123: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 310: 307: 267: 263: 259: 244: 232: 220: 197: 185: 165: 153: 139: 127: 116: 45: 43: 31: 28: 297:Someguy1221 289:) has made 190:Someguy1221 158:Bueller 007 144:Someguy1221 279:Contontos 273:Contontos 225:Guettarda 287:contribs 174:Dhartung 140:Comment. 132:Ronnotel 111:View log 84:protect 79:history 245:Delete 237:Vsmith 233:Delete 221:Delete 186:Delete 166:Delete 88:delete 46:DELETE 249:BozMo 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 283:talk 266:and 260:Keep 252:talk 198:Keep 178:Talk 172:. -- 154:Keep 128:Keep 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 202:RCT 109:– ( 50:Doc 48:. - 285:• 277:— 176:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 281:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Doc
14:05, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Doomsday Called Off
Doomsday Called Off
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
William M. Connolley
19:12, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Ronnotel
20:17, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
Someguy1221
07:06, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Bueller 007
05:36, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory of argumentation in debates
Dhartung
Talk
05:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Someguy1221
07:05, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.