559:
Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable. Academics/professors meeting none of these conditions may still be notable if they meet the conditions of WP:BIO or other notability criteria, and the merits of an article on the
552:
The relevant criterion is WP:PROF, which is an alternative to the GNG. Widely quoted as an authority meets it specifically by standard 1, an authority in his field. The standard was adopted because otherwise the usual secondary sources are not available in this field. The relative status of the GNG
530:
I have mixed thoughts about this one. Although he is an expert, he does not seem to be a groundbreaker; it seems more that he is knowledgeable than that he has advanced the sciences. The article lacks sourcing for most of the content, which would require serious trimming if the article is kept. If
297:, though I was initially inclined otherwise when I saw his pubs in Pubmed (with him as senior author in NEJM, etc). Looking beyond the obviously-personal touches in the article that need to be removed, the subject just doesn't rise to the level of notability by
166:
252:
531:
kept, the article so far as I can tell will show he knows his stuff, had a responsible job which he executed without incident, and that's all I can see. I am sorry, but I have to lean to
452:
Being widely quoted and receiving significant coverage aren't the same thing. Those articles only significantly cover radiation issues, and don't discuss
Schauer in any great detail. –
119:
562:
The publications and quotations are verifiable, and that is sufficient. Incidentally, I would be very reluctant to be more restrictive than David E in this field of science)
160:
272:
52:. While the !vote appears to be close, DGG's arguments have more weight and logic to them. The debate has been up for almost one whole month; it's time to close it up.
232:
197:
I don't think this individual meets notability guidelines. Coverage provided in the article is mainly primary sources that do not establish notability. There is this
126:
92:
87:
371:
212:
96:
581:. I was on the fence and had to think about this. But then happily read DGG's analysis, which I find convincing. Therefore, keep.--
17:
79:
201:
article, but it doesn't focus on him in great detail, and it's about all I can find. The initial contributor of the article is
181:
148:
619:. Also the publications listed are not his own work, but of others working for the same organisation, so fails criteria in
432:
653:
198:
40:
480:
I think that's why it should be delete, though. Being quoted as an expert on a subject doesn't make one notable. –
142:
539:
471:
443:
634:
607:
590:
573:
544:
521:
489:
475:
461:
447:
413:
378:
332:
314:
284:
264:
244:
224:
61:
138:
407:
362:
206:
649:
631:
598:
Appears to be a vanity page for someone who has not received significant coverage in secondary sources.
202:
188:
83:
36:
302:
586:
536:
467:
439:
174:
505:
434:
390:
344:
485:
457:
401:
355:
220:
280:
260:
240:
154:
57:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
620:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
625:
603:
75:
67:
616:
298:
582:
436:
328:
310:
569:
481:
453:
216:
516:
276:
256:
236:
53:
113:
599:
430:
428:
426:
560:
academic/professor will depend largely on the extent to which it is verifiable.
324:
306:
508:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
393:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
347:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
564:
553:
and the speciality guidelines depends on which guideline. WP:PROF is
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
400:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers,
253:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
109:
105:
101:
425:. Widely quoted as an expert on radiation issues e.g.
173:
515:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
656:). No further edits should be made to this page.
273:list of Military-related deletion discussions
8:
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:list of Science-related deletion discussions
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:
250:
230:
466:True, that's why it's only a weak keep. —
323:- DGG's argument below is compelling. --
557:an alternative to WP:BIO. and the GNG.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
635:03:55, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
608:07:33, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
591:00:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
574:16:04, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
545:10:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
522:09:12, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
379:01:33, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
333:02:36, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
315:00:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
285:19:13, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
265:12:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
245:12:46, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
225:15:58, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
62:17:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
490:18:17, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
476:21:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
462:21:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
448:21:15, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
414:00:05, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
673:
615:fails notability test in
645:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
403:Riley Huntley (public)
524:
416:
412:
381:
287:
267:
247:
664:
647:
628:
542:
519:
514:
510:
406:
404:
399:
395:
376:
369:
360:
353:
349:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
76:David A. Schauer
68:David A. Schauer
48:The result was
34:
672:
671:
667:
666:
665:
663:
662:
661:
660:
654:deletion review
643:
626:
540:
517:
503:
410:
402:
388:
372:
363:
356:
342:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
670:
668:
659:
658:
638:
637:
610:
593:
576:
547:
527:
526:
525:
512:
511:
500:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
468:David Eppstein
440:David Eppstein
419:
418:
417:
408:
397:
396:
385:
384:
383:
382:
351:
350:
339:
338:
337:
336:
335:
289:
288:
268:
248:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
669:
657:
655:
651:
646:
640:
639:
636:
633:
630:
629:
622:
618:
614:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
594:
592:
588:
584:
580:
577:
575:
571:
567:
566:
561:
556:
551:
548:
546:
543:
538:
534:
529:
528:
523:
520:
513:
509:
507:
502:
501:
491:
487:
483:
479:
478:
477:
473:
469:
465:
464:
463:
459:
455:
451:
450:
449:
445:
441:
437:
435:
433:
431:
429:
427:
424:
421:
420:
415:
411:
405:
398:
394:
392:
387:
386:
380:
377:
375:
370:
368:
367:
361:
359:
352:
348:
346:
341:
340:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
295:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
214:
211:
208:
204:
203:Davidaschauer
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
644:
641:
624:
612:
595:
578:
563:
558:
554:
549:
532:
504:
422:
389:
373:
365:
364:
357:
343:
320:
293:
292:
209:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
627:Phazakerley
623:as well. --
319:changed to
303:WP:ACADEMIC
161:free images
583:Epeefleche
555:explicitly
650:talk page
541:Chihuahua
423:Weak keep
366:Phightins
257:• Gene93k
237:• Gene93k
37:talk page
652:or in a
506:Relisted
482:Muboshgu
454:Muboshgu
391:Relisted
345:Relisted
217:Muboshgu
213:contribs
120:View log
39:or in a
621:WP:PROF
518:Mediran
277:Rlendog
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
54:Bearian
632:(talk)
617:WP:GNG
613:Delete
600:Nick-D
596:Delete
537:Killer
533:Delete
305:. --
299:WP:GNG
294:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
570:talk
325:Scray
307:Scray
215:). –
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
604:talk
587:talk
579:Keep
550:Keep
486:talk
472:talk
458:talk
444:talk
409:talk
329:talk
321:Keep
311:talk
281:talk
261:talk
241:talk
221:talk
207:talk
199:WaPo
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
50:keep
565:DGG
438:. —
301:or
189:TWL
118:– (
606:)
589:)
572:)
535:.
488:)
474:)
460:)
446:)
358:Go
331:)
313:)
283:)
275:.
263:)
255:.
243:)
235:.
223:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
602:(
585:(
568:(
484:(
470:(
456:(
442:(
374:!
327:(
309:(
279:(
259:(
239:(
219:(
210:·
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.