219:: local political party chairs, municipal politicians, and failed candidates for higher officer are not inherently notable. (In the previous AfD of nine years ago, the arguments advanced for Keep were that Pepper had inherent notability due to losing a large election or holding a municipal office; one argument was that mayors of major cities are notable under POLOUTCOMES, therefore, councilors must also be notable. Since that AfD, this has since been clarified as not the case.)
426:
enough to get him over GNG, because two of the four sources are routine coverage of his campaigns for races he didn't win, a third is routine coverage of his campaign for a county-level office that he did win but doesn't constitute an automatic NPOL pass in and of itself, and the fourth is covering
314:
Of course it is personal opinion. Policy is silly on wikipedia a lot of the time. This article gets five to ten page views most days. Hit the random article button, and most articles have fewer. Select a random state legislator and you'll get fewer. I think wikipedia should give the reader what she
233:, however, all sources in article are routine coverage related to his two failed campaigns for Auditor, and AG. A BEFORE search on Google News finds him appearing in a handful of places but only in the form of one-line reaction quotes. Nothing on JSTOR, newspapers.com, or Google Books.
184:
83:
447:
sourcing that's actually covering him in the context of the notability claim itself, is not how you make a party chair notable enough. No prejudice against recreation if somebody can do better than this.
296:". While this might be a valid argument to make in a proposal to amend the notability guidelines, an individual AfD is for purposes of determining if an article qualifies under the guidelines
137:
597:- Meets GNG when one considers status as head of a state party organization with status as a published-and-reviewed novelist. Sufficient coverage to support encyclopedic biography.
375:
178:
78:
503:
144:
523:
251:
Members of the state legislature have articles no matter how inconsequential they are. Leaders of state parties like this person and his
Republican counterpart,
288:, or a personal opinion? This seems to be a variation of the argument extended in the original AFD that, because mayors qualify under POLOUTCOMES, councilors
550:. He was a city council member of a large city, county commissioner, ran for mayor and state AG, and has been state chairman of a major party in a crucial
474:
469:, in addition to being a councilmember of a regional city, commissioner of a large county, and chair of a state-level political party. (See this review in
470:
110:
105:
633:
114:
17:
656:
639:
606:
585:
563:
535:
515:
494:
457:
387:
366:
341:
324:
309:
264:
242:
62:
97:
60:
199:
166:
675:
422:
handed an automatic presumption of notability just because they exist — but the amount of coverage being shown here is
40:
357:
Does not pass our notability guidelines. Legislature members create actual laws, party leaders have no actual power.
320:
260:
481:) (The subject's personal site shows a longer list of RS reviews). While any one of his activities may not meet
362:
160:
223:
652:
431:. This would be keepable if somebody could show some evidence of a GNG-passing volume of coverage for his work
285:
216:
383:
156:
627:
547:
671:
316:
256:
36:
206:
358:
101:
58:
648:
619:
581:
337:
305:
238:
192:
466:
428:
379:
485:
by itself, it is hard to see that in total, the subject would fail the notability guidelines. --
623:
602:
559:
531:
511:
490:
453:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
670:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
281:
172:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
482:
415:
230:
93:
68:
53:
411:
226:, the fact he is the son of the CEO of Procter & Gamble does not make him notable.
577:
333:
301:
234:
427:
him only in the context of writing a book that isn't notable enough to get him over
598:
555:
527:
507:
486:
449:
330:"Of course it is personal opinion. Policy is silly on wikipedia a lot of the time."
131:
329:
277:
551:
273:
252:
615:
647:- as noted above, has held offices that would substantiate him as notable.
439:— but merely being able to show that a few sources exist about otherwise
664:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
292:; "because legislators qualify under POLOUTCOMES, party chairs
229:
In the absence of political notability, would need to pass the
315:
is looking for, not some arbitrary definition of notability.
618:
area, plus the coverage of his book (in outlets such as the
398:. We keep articles about legislators because they actually
127:
123:
119:
191:
84:
Articles for deletion/David A. Pepper (2nd nomination)
614:
the local political offices he was elected to in the
205:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
678:). No further edits should be made to this page.
522:Note: This discussion has been included in the
502:Note: This discussion has been included in the
376:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
374:Note: This discussion has been included in the
443:aspects of his prior activity, while showing
332:Okay. We may just have to agree to disagree.
280:Is this a policy based argument drawing from
8:
504:list of Authors-related deletion discussions
255:, are at least as notable as those people.
521:
501:
410:they can be properly referenced to enough
373:
524:list of Ohio-related deletion discussions
278:"are at least as notable as those people"
76:
300:- not the guidelines we wish existed.
79:Articles for deletion/David A. Pepper
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
75:
622:) is enough non-trivial coverage.
276:is also a good candidate for AFD.
24:
402:. State political party chairs
1:
657:01:32, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
640:18:10, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
607:18:13, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
586:04:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
564:00:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
536:22:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
516:22:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
495:22:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
458:22:27, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
388:13:31, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
367:23:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
342:23:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
325:22:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
310:20:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
265:19:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
243:17:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
63:17:20, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
695:
667:Please do not modify it.
548:my standards for lawyers
435:the role of party chair
32:Please do not modify it.
298:as they currently exist
576:notability standards?
572:Wait - he passes your
74:AfDs for this article:
620:Wall Street Journal
479:The People’s House.
414:coverage to clear
538:
518:
471:Politico Magazine
390:
359:John Pack Lambert
686:
669:
636:
630:
331:
317:Roseohioresident
279:
257:Roseohioresident
210:
209:
195:
147:
135:
117:
34:
694:
693:
689:
688:
687:
685:
684:
683:
682:
676:deletion review
665:
634:
628:
412:reliable source
224:WP:NOTINHERITED
152:
143:
108:
94:David A. Pepper
92:
89:
72:
69:David A. Pepper
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
692:
690:
681:
680:
660:
659:
649:Deathlibrarian
642:
609:
591:
590:
589:
588:
567:
566:
540:
539:
519:
498:
497:
475:Cincinnati.com
460:
392:
391:
370:
369:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
286:WP:POLOUTCOMES
268:
267:
217:WP:POLOUTCOMES
213:
212:
149:
88:
87:
86:
81:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
691:
679:
677:
673:
668:
662:
661:
658:
654:
650:
646:
643:
641:
637:
631:
625:
621:
617:
613:
610:
608:
604:
600:
596:
593:
592:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
569:
568:
565:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
525:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
500:
499:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
459:
455:
451:
446:
442:
438:
434:
430:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:get articles
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:Coolabahapple
377:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
353:
352:
343:
339:
335:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
275:
272:
271:
270:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
227:
225:
220:
218:
208:
204:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
158:
155:
154:Find sources:
150:
146:
142:
139:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
85:
82:
80:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
666:
663:
644:
624:power~enwiki
611:
594:
573:
546:- he passes
543:
478:
477:of his book
462:
444:
440:
436:
432:
423:
419:
407:
403:
399:
395:
354:
297:
293:
289:
248:
228:
221:
214:
202:
196:
188:
181:
175:
169:
163:
153:
140:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
552:swing state
441:non-notable
274:Jane Timken
253:Jane Timken
179:free images
616:Cincinnati
418:, but are
55:Ritchie333
672:talk page
578:Chetsford
467:WP:AUTHOR
465:May meet
429:WP:AUTHOR
400:pass laws
334:Chetsford
302:Chetsford
235:Chetsford
37:talk page
674:or in a
574:personal
138:View log
39:or in a
599:Carrite
556:Bearian
528:Enos733
508:Enos733
487:Enos733
450:Bearcat
282:WP:NPOL
185:WP refs
173:scholar
111:protect
106:history
483:WP:GNG
437:itself
416:WP:GNG
396:Delete
355:Delete
294:should
290:should
231:WP:GNG
215:Fails
157:Google
115:delete
200:JSTOR
161:books
145:Stats
132:views
124:watch
120:links
16:<
653:talk
645:Keep
612:Keep
603:talk
595:Keep
582:talk
560:talk
544:Keep
532:talk
512:talk
491:talk
473:and
463:Keep
454:talk
384:talk
363:talk
338:talk
321:talk
306:talk
261:talk
249:Keep
239:talk
222:Per
193:FENS
167:news
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
50:keep
424:not
420:not
404:can
284:or
207:TWL
136:– (
655:)
638:)
632:,
605:)
584:)
562:)
554:.
534:)
526:.
514:)
506:.
493:)
456:)
445:no
433:in
408:if
386:)
378:.
365:)
340:)
323:)
308:)
263:)
241:)
187:)
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
52:.
651:(
635:ν
629:π
626:(
601:(
580:(
558:(
530:(
510:(
489:(
452:(
382:(
361:(
336:(
319:(
304:(
259:(
237:(
211:)
203:·
197:·
189:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
159:(
151:(
148:)
141:·
134:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.