Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/David Baggett - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

114: 17: 87: 82: 203:
per notability concerns, plus a lot of it is OR (apparently the editor got some of the info by speaking directly to the subject?)
91: 74: 222: 36: 221:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
207: 195: 183: 168: 149: 132: 122: 56: 78: 125:. David Baggett has no first-class cricket connection although the article has tried to infer this. 70: 62: 179:- He is not notable as a statistician nor as an umpire so I do not see a reason for keeping this. 146: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
180: 127: 192: 142: 165: 108: 159:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
204: 50: 121:
subject is non-notable and should be deleted as per several similar cases in
141:- I can't think of any notable living cricket statisticians, other than 215:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
104: 100: 96: 164:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 225:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 191:nothing offered here implies notability. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 208:17:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC) 196:15:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 184:01:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC) 169:23:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC) 57:00:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC) 242: 150:22:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 133:21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC) 218:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 171: 233: 220: 163: 161: 112: 94: 53: 34: 241: 240: 236: 235: 234: 232: 231: 230: 229: 223:deletion review 216: 157: 123:this discussion 85: 69: 66: 51: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 239: 237: 228: 227: 211: 210: 198: 186: 173: 172: 162: 154: 153: 152: 119: 118: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 238: 226: 224: 219: 213: 212: 209: 206: 202: 199: 197: 194: 190: 187: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174: 170: 167: 160: 156: 155: 151: 148: 147:Lordrosemount 144: 143:Bill Frindall 140: 137: 136: 135: 134: 131: 129: 124: 116: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 71:David Baggett 68: 67: 64: 63:David Baggett 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 217: 214: 200: 188: 176: 158: 138: 126: 120: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 181:Brusegadi 128:BlackJack 193:Nuttah68 115:View log 166:Caknuck 88:protect 83:history 205:JCO312 201:Delete 189:Delete 177:Delete 139:Delete 92:delete 52:Kurykh 46:delete 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 113:– ( 145:. 130:| 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 117:) 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Kurykh
00:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
David Baggett
David Baggett
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
this discussion
BlackJack
21:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Bill Frindall
Lordrosemount
22:22, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Caknuck
23:03, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
Brusegadi
01:37, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Nuttah68
15:56, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
JCO312
17:53, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.