516:. References #1 and #2 are election returns (i.e. these are essentially stats, not significant coverage), #3 is a blurb about the candidate from the Republican Party (i.e. not independent), #4, #5, and #6 were written by the subject (i.e. not independent), and #7 is the subject quoted in a local paper (i.e.
429:. No doubt this is due to the not-very-notable office he is running for - a seat on a state regulatory agency. I see that the sitting commissioners do have Knowledge (XXG) articles, so if he wins an article can be written at that time, but it would be
166:
273:. He is leading in public opinion polls and has a strong chance of winning the Nov. 2 general election. Wouldn't the fact that he has already won more than 700,000 votes be a factor in establishing notability?
201:. Current claim of notability stems solely from margin of victory in most recently held primary election. Article subject has held no public office beyond local hospital district board.
425:. In fact he seems to be pretty much off the radar even in Texas. His "huge upset" in the primary garnered no press coverage that I could find except for a one-paragraph mention in the
121:
234:
160:
373:
comes to mind. The odds of this one winning the election are so high that we'd be engaging in pointless bureaucracy to delete now, and re-create when, not if, he wins.
393:
508:. Knowledge (XXG) sees lots of these types of articles come election time. Currently fails significant coverage in independent reliable sources necessary to pass
126:
94:
89:
98:
17:
81:
48:. Does not seem to be enough of a strong consensus to delete at this point in time, editors are urged to improve the quality of
181:
426:
148:
434:
544:
36:
142:
543:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
489:
I don't know if Weems is notable, as I don't have info on him. He has already polled more than 400,000 votes.
529:
498:
494:
480:
466:
462:
450:
408:
383:
358:
324:
320:
298:
294:
262:
223:
138:
63:
513:
418:
333:
198:
85:
52:
secondary source referencing at the page, and please continue discussion, at the article's talk page. --
349:
253:
214:
433:
to keep it now on the basis that he is likely to win 2 months from now. By the way (in response to the
188:
517:
430:
174:
525:
490:
476:
458:
446:
381:
316:
290:
438:
457:
I would not object to an article on Jeff Weems, but I don't have the material for writing it.
404:
285:. In 2010, Radnofsky is the Democratic candidate, not likely to win, against Attorney General
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370:
154:
341:
245:
206:
509:
422:
77:
69:
49:
315:, but she qualifies for inclusion. In her case, it could be for her AFL-CIO connection.
312:
59:
521:
472:
442:
375:
307:: Here is a second link of a Democratic nominee on the Nov. 2, 2010 ballot in Texas:
400:
115:
286:
54:
308:
441:
does not have a
Wikepedia page - so why do you think Porter should? --
197:
Political candidate who does not (yet) meet notability guidelines at
282:
437:
argument from Billy
Hathorn), I note that his Democratic opponent
537:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
111:
107:
103:
421:) who has not received the coverage necessary to meet
173:
471:
My point was that Jeff Weems isn't notable either. --
187:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
547:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
417:Non-notable. Unelected candidate (thus failing
311:. I don't think she is likely to win against
309:http://en.wikipedia.org/Linda_Chavez-Thompson
8:
394:list of Texas-related deletion discussions
388:
229:
283:http://en.wikipedia.org/Barbara_Radnofsky
392:: This debate has been included in the
233:: This debate has been included in the
277:Here is a link on Knowledge (XXG) of a
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
281:statewide candidate from 2006:
530:16:12, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
499:05:22, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
481:00:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
467:18:57, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
451:14:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
409:19:52, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
384:15:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
359:14:32, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
325:13:44, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
299:11:36, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
263:13:16, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
224:11:30, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
64:05:55, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
564:
427:San Angelo Standard-Times
540:Please do not modify it.
506:Delete without prejudice
32:Please do not modify it.
435:WP:Otherstuffexists
380:
44:The result was
411:
397:
374:
265:
238:
555:
542:
398:
378:
357:
356:
352:
346:
340:
261:
260:
256:
250:
244:
239:
222:
221:
217:
211:
205:
192:
191:
177:
129:
119:
101:
34:
563:
562:
558:
557:
556:
554:
553:
552:
551:
545:deletion review
538:
376:
354:
350:
342:
338:
337:
305:Additional link
258:
254:
246:
242:
241:
219:
215:
207:
203:
202:
134:
125:
92:
78:David J. Porter
76:
73:
70:David J. Porter
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
561:
559:
550:
549:
533:
532:
502:
501:
486:
485:
484:
483:
454:
453:
412:
386:
364:
363:
362:
361:
313:David Dewhurst
275:
274:
267:
266:
195:
194:
131:
127:AfD statistics
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
560:
548:
546:
541:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:WP:POLITICIAN
511:
507:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
491:Billy Hathorn
488:
487:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
464:
460:
459:Billy Hathorn
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
428:
424:
420:
419:WP:POLITICIAN
416:
413:
410:
406:
402:
395:
391:
387:
385:
382:
379:
372:
369:
366:
365:
360:
353:
347:
345:
335:
334:WP:OTHERSTUFF
331:
328:
327:
326:
322:
318:
317:Billy Hathorn
314:
310:
306:
303:
302:
301:
300:
296:
292:
291:Billy Hathorn
288:
284:
280:
272:
269:
268:
264:
257:
251:
249:
236:
232:
228:
227:
226:
225:
218:
212:
210:
200:
199:WP:POLITICIAN
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
123:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
539:
536:
505:
414:
389:
367:
343:
329:
304:
278:
276:
270:
247:
230:
208:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
344:Uncle Milty
332:Please see
287:Greg Abbott
248:Uncle Milty
209:Uncle Milty
161:free images
518:WP:NOTNEWS
439:Jeff Weems
431:WP:CRYSTAL
401:• Gene93k
522:Location
473:MelanieN
443:MelanieN
279:defeated
122:View log
371:WP:BURO
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
510:WP:GNG
423:WP:GNG
415:Delete
139:Google
99:delete
330:Note:
182:JSTOR
143:books
116:views
108:watch
104:links
50:WP:RS
16:<
526:talk
512:and
495:talk
477:talk
463:talk
447:talk
405:talk
390:Note
368:Keep
351:talk
321:talk
295:talk
271:Keep
255:talk
231:Note
216:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
60:talk
55:Cirt
399:--
377:Ray
189:TWL
124:•
120:– (
528:)
520:.
497:)
479:)
465:)
449:)
407:)
396:.
348:|
336:--
323:)
297:)
289:.
252:|
237:.
213:|
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
524:(
493:(
475:(
461:(
445:(
403:(
355:|
339:|
319:(
293:(
259:|
243:|
240:—
220:|
204:|
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
118:)
80:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.