372:- about 190 Google hits on the name in quotes, but nothing substantial or third-party coming to the fore in a look through them. There's some notability mentioned in the article, but I don't see citations to back it up. If it's deleted but he's notable enough for an article, someone can certainly recreate - with the sources included.
389:
A search turned up nothing on this person. While I understand and admit that the internet doesn't contain all the works of mankind and it's quite possible to be thoroughly notable with no internet presence at all, it's not the job of individual editors to thoroughly search for sources which should be
257:
In which case, if it's deleted, it can always be recreated later with proper citations. Generally speaking articles without references run the risk of potential deletion until such time as the references can be provided, even if the information appears to possibly be accurate.
419:
be verifiable simply means that it will be easier to recreate the article properly at a later time. Deletion due to lack of references doesn't mean the article can't later resurface in a better form.
402:
appears to be verifiable, and the course for missing refs is to mark unreferenced. . WP does not (or should not ) exclude notable figures whose supporters dont know how to write WP articles.
117:
313:
I think deleting is wrong in this case. I think this article should be kept. It should not have been tagged for AfD. It should have been tagged
90:
85:
94:
77:
17:
218:
438:
36:
415:
Sure it does. Articles are frequently deleted in part or in whole because they are unreferenced. The fact that it
317:
423:
408:
394:
381:
364:
337:
305:
280:
262:
250:
234:
222:
201:
189:
177:
161:
135:
59:
437:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
81:
356:
327:
73:
65:
377:
56:
334:
277:
132:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
391:
347:
154:
289:
273:
170:
55:. The one Japanese source looks pretty doubtful as it appears to be seller company. -
243:
210:
145:
125:
52:
373:
300:
294:
420:
259:
129:
111:
247:
214:
198:
174:
149:
231:
186:
404:
128:. I can tell he is an artist, just can't find how he is a notable artist
242:
and attempt to find citations. I'm not a fan of deleting articles on
431:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
107:
103:
99:
333:. This is a notable person if the facts check out.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
441:). No further edits should be made to this page.
246:alone, because I think that it could be cited.
272:unless properly sourced and referenced i.a.w.
124:Subject of article does notmeet guidelines of
8:
390:included in the article at creation.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
288:unsourced is bad, unsourced from a
230:but thoroughly rewrite and wikify
24:
345:Article seems to lack notability.
171:Possible conflict of interest.
1:
209:unless his notability can be
424:22:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
409:04:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
395:21:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
382:20:53, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
365:18:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
338:17:33, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
306:16:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
281:15:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
263:21:25, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
251:14:54, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
235:14:38, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
223:14:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
202:03:15, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
190:02:45, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
178:00:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
162:00:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
136:00:04, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
60:03:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
458:
169:unless verified somehow.
434:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
290:single-purpose account
392:Cheers, Lankybugger
276:by end of this AfD
292:raises red flags.
74:David Lloyd Glover
66:David Lloyd Glover
380:
318:Citations missing
304:
449:
436:
376:
363:
360:
353:
352:
332:
326:
322:
316:
298:
158:
152:
115:
97:
48:
34:
457:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
447:
446:
445:
439:deletion review
432:
358:
350:
349:
346:
330:
324:
320:
314:
221:
156:
150:
88:
72:
69:
46:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
455:
453:
444:
443:
427:
426:
412:
411:
397:
384:
367:
340:
308:
283:
266:
265:
254:
253:
237:
225:
217:
204:
192:
180:
164:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
454:
442:
440:
435:
429:
428:
425:
422:
418:
414:
413:
410:
407:
406:
401:
398:
396:
393:
388:
385:
383:
379:
375:
371:
368:
366:
362:
361:
355:
354:
344:
341:
339:
336:
329:
319:
312:
309:
307:
302:
297:
296:
291:
287:
284:
282:
279:
275:
271:
268:
267:
264:
261:
256:
255:
252:
249:
245:
241:
238:
236:
233:
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
203:
200:
196:
193:
191:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
172:
168:
165:
163:
160:
159:
153:
147:
143:
140:
139:
138:
137:
134:
131:
127:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:Mailer Diablo
54:
50:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
433:
430:
416:
403:
399:
386:
369:
357:
348:
342:
335:TonyTheTiger
328:unreferenced
310:
293:
285:
278:Alf photoman
269:
239:
227:
206:
194:
182:
166:
155:
141:
123:
53:unverifiable
45:
43:
31:
28:
197:per above.
185:per above.
144:per nom as
374:Tony Fox
211:verified
118:View log
421:Dugwiki
260:Dugwiki
130:Nv8200p
91:protect
86:history
387:Delete
378:(arf!)
370:Delete
359:addict
343:Delete
286:Delete
274:WP:BIO
270:Delete
248:JCO312
215:danntm
207:Delete
199:Just H
195:Delete
183:Delete
175:N Shar
167:Delete
142:Delete
95:delete
417:might
351:Telly
301:Help!
232:LHOON
187:MER-C
112:views
104:watch
100:links
49:elete
16:<
400:keep
311:Keep
244:WP:V
240:Keep
228:Keep
213:.--
146:WP:V
133:talk
126:WP:V
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
405:DGG
323:or
295:Guy
157:top
151:Big
116:– (
51:as
331:}}
325:{{
321:}}
315:{{
173:--
148:.
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
303:)
299:(
219:C
120:)
114:)
76:(
47:d
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.