326:
How do you make the link between "Davison Design & Development" and "Davison
Associates"? None of the two sources (Forbes and Pittsburgh-Post Gazette) mention "Davison Associates", which is, as far as I can see, the article's title. Is there a reliable source for that? I am confused.
395:
Please see the talk page about the scam section. There is no problem to prove that they were sued for scamming and found guilty. And there is no problem to prove that they are continuing with the exact same program, as before they lost in court.
158:
416:
Judge
Lancaster’s decision sends a strong signal to all those invention promotion and licensing firms that prey upon America’s independent inventor community that fraudulent and unscrupulous practices will not be
363:
which does not make the firm sould like an article will provide much business for them. Note the name change apparently to just "Davison" or "Davison Design and
Development" and the court ordered notice at
119:
361:
152:
430:
337:
Alright, I can see the link now. It might be notable after all... Meanwhile, the FTC court case seems more notable than the company itself... --
92:
87:
96:
79:
190:
17:
173:
293:. Two reliable sources already cited: Pittsburgh-Post Gazette and a lengthy acticle in Forbes, reporting on a large FTC order.
140:
229:
49:
272:
is to avoid a bureaucratic process, so of course it's perfcetly sensible to cite it at the very beginning of that process.
421:
So
Davison was chosen as one of the major scamming firms (Note the same FTC statement calls Davison's outfit: "typical of
459:
36:
367:. 16 people made money out of over six hundred thoudand people contacting the firm. Not a real impressive number.
134:
445:
410:
In addition to my former remark: The FTC issued a specific statement about
Davison making it notable, quoting a
405:
376:
346:
319:
302:
281:
263:
242:
206:
61:
458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
130:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
257:
83:
180:
57:
269:
425:".) IMHO this is enough to make Davison notable. Combined with the Forbes article, it should be kept.
298:
277:
247:"Snowball" seems a little silly when you are the first person other than the nominator to comment.
166:
237:
342:
332:
315:
249:
225:
202:
75:
67:
146:
441:
401:
372:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
233:
53:
193:. Has not been subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
294:
273:
422:
338:
328:
311:
310:- Has multiple reliable third-party sources. Definitely meets notability guidelines.
221:
198:
437:
397:
385:
368:
113:
392:. There are several reasons Inventionland is notable, while Davison is less so.
365:
216:
411:
452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
165:
179:
219:not a "reliable, independent secondary source" ?
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
431:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
429:Note: This debate has been included in the
428:
360:the firm will like the results - I found
414:(the US patent office) official saying:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
335:) 19:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
62:10:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
446:01:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
406:21:43, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
377:19:44, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
347:20:14, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
320:19:29, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
303:19:26, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
282:20:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
264:19:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
243:19:25, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
207:19:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
189:Non-notable company. Fails
479:
268:What? The entire point of
423:invention promotion scams
191:WP:Notability (companies)
455:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
325:<edit conflict: -->
388:) But change back to
76:Davison Associates
68:Davison Associates
44:The result was
448:
434:
50:non-admin closure
470:
457:
435:
262:
260:
256:
252:
241:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
453:
258:
254:
250:
248:
220:
215:How exaclty is
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
449:
426:
419:
408:
398:פשוט pashute ♫
393:
379:
351:
350:
349:
305:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
456:
450:
447:
443:
439:
432:
427:
424:
420:
418:
413:
409:
407:
403:
399:
394:
391:
390:Inventionland
387:
383:
380:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
359:
355:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
334:
330:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
309:
306:
304:
300:
296:
292:
291:snowball keep
289:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
265:
261:
253:
246:
245:
244:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
218:
214:
213:Snowball keep
211:
210:
209:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
451:
415:
389:
386:user:pashute
381:
357:
353:
324:
307:
290:
212:
194:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
270:WP:Snowball
153:free images
54:Crisco 1492
417:tolerated.
295:GDallimore
274:GDallimore
438:• Gene93k
356:though I
339:Edcolins
329:Edcolins
312:ItsZippy
230:contribs
222:Headbomb
199:Edcolins
120:View log
369:Collect
259:Shalott
234:physics
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
217:Forbes
195:Delete
131:Google
97:delete
412:USPTO
358:doubt
238:books
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
442:talk
402:talk
382:Keep
373:talk
354:Keep
343:talk
333:talk
316:talk
308:Keep
299:Talk
278:Talk
251:Lady
226:talk
203:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
181:TWL
118:– (
48:. (
444:)
436:—
433:.
404:)
375:)
345:)
327:--
318:)
301:)
280:)
255:of
236:/
232:/
228:/
205:)
197:.
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
440:(
400:(
384:(
371:(
341:(
331:(
314:(
297:(
276:(
240:}
224:{
201:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.