535:
Blackfish articles. A few interviews prior to her death doesn't prove that she was anything else than a reasonably well known seaworld employee who got the chance to be interviewed because she had an unusual job, and even if she was mildly notable why should we have another article which just repeats the same information? If you can find more information about why she was important to seaworld while alive maybe this article would have a case for existing.
493:. There is a photograph in the infobox of the aircraft that was involved in the crash that was taken about five years prior. Does that make the airframe notable, since a photograph existed of it prior to the incident to which it is indelibly connected? Or, is it simply that someone happened to be at an airport and snapped a picture of a departing aircraft, and its registration just happened to match that of the aircraft in the crash?
940:) It has been contended that the post-mortem circumstances and legal arguments gave birth to Florida 406.136, passed in 2011.(2nd ref, and 2 others I am working through). This material is not a good fit for the suggested merge-to articles. Whether or not a rename of this article is appropriate need not be decided at AfD and would logically depend on the article situation after the additional content is integrated.
627:
Her only lasting notability is through her death by
Tilikum. Her random appearance on some newscast before her death is not notable in the least. Anything that is notable about her is already covered in the Tilikum article. There is no reason to repeat the same information in a separate article since
933:
benchmark. In addition to the death itself, material is available and should be included (I will try to do so in the next few days) that is reasonably distinct from her death itself: subsequently a groundbreaking legal situation arose regarding release or non-disclosure of the SeaWorld surveillance
488:
The "reference" is a photograph that could have been of ANY trainer, depending on the performance schedule that day and when the photographer visited the park. Nothing in the photograph or its history suggests that the photographer was actively seeking out the trainer because of any perceived fame.
441:
Respectfully disagree. The second event is a film chronicle that includes the first event, and most likely would have not existed without the first event. Had the second event been standalone, maybe. But the two are inextricably linked. My continued issue is that the information before her death is
317:
article fork from the article where her notoriety is derived; almost all the cited information in the article came from the
Tilikum article, and that which isn't already there can easily be added. The uncited information is intended to memorialize the victim, not provide any information as to their
827:
No. There are not multiple events. There is one event which has been covered in a documentary. You are just as guilty of repeated comments as your opposition is. There is no ineptitude going on, it's a discussion with people coming with arguments but so far I don't see any evidence heavy enough to
1004:
I confirm that the direct correlation that you wanted to confirm is explicitly asserted in the cited reliable sources: e.g. "The
Florida law was adopted partly in response to the death of Dawn Brancheau in 2010." I have removed or sourced the previously uncited content and added appropriate cited
899:
Except there doesn't seem to be much of note. This discussion has been going on for a while even before the deletion tag was added. I urge the people who want the article to remain to actually find reliable sources that prove that she did anything of note before her death and the documentary that
496:
As to the "individual's role", nothing has been established to suggest that her role was anything more than being in the wrong place at the wrong time, thus making 1E VERY important. Plus, NOTMEMORIAL is still a major problem, since when all the uncited information is removed, all that's left is
313:- Almost all information regarding this individual appeared AFTER the event that made her notable. The fact that she was featured in local news reports could be just as much about her being in the right place at the right time (that is, working when the news cameras showed up). This is clearly a
534:
Stop attaching a bunch of emotions to this. Try being objective. It doesn't matter if the article is about an airplane or a person. If she isn't notable outside of her death and she should not have her own separate article. Everything in this article that is of value could be in the
Tilikum or
728:
All the talk about her being the poster girl of the company has come out after her death, maybe in heighsight it seems that she may have been slightly more important to the company than any of the other trainers but as far a as I can tell that still just proves to make this page a memorial
710:
isn't about condemning rockstars, looked up to by children, to the dustbin of history. It's about if you were just some idiot who stepped in front of a bus one morning, and made more than one daily paper, and so you should get a
Knowledge (XXG) article. Quit abusing the system. --
1005:
content. I renamed the article. The corrected and expanded article is now 21010 bytes versus 8000 when I started. Given the change in opinion by 2 editors (altho the bolded !votes have not been updated), this AfD discussion has attained consensus in favor of article retention.
724:
I have no idea what the nonsense you wrote after that about rockstars have to do about anything. I'm not abusing the system. That's a ridiculous accusation. In my opinion she doesn't deserve an article and any of the things which this article has shown has disproved that at
215:
I would like say that since some editors have done a great job of finding relevant information that shows that
Brancheau's death did have some significant effects, even outside of seaworld, that I've reconsidered my position and agree that the article should be moved to
1080:
Concur. (On the page renaming aspect, I am conflicted. AfD closure is not dependent on this, and in the interest of brevity in an AfD which has been open since March 19th, and which has otherwise attained consensus, it's reasonable to discuss this there if necessary.)
574:
I'm sorry but it's without a doubt an emotional appeal to bring up the fact that she's human. She wasn't important and thus does not warrant an article. There are not two different events, it's one event and a film which focuses particularly on said
935:
938:
720:
No. It's not wrong to point out that someone who is only known for one event does not necessarily deserve their own article. As has already been said everything of value in this article can already be found in the
Tilikum or Blackfish
853:. One event does not mean the subject is necessarily unworthy of an article. There is (plenty) significant coverage, not only from the time of the event but ongoing, continuing coverage many years later. Meets gng thoroughly.
170:
817:
should apply, but, also, that the subject's biography relates to multiple events, via which the subject's whole biography could thus be assembled, belies the underlying ineptitude of this entire discussion. --
201:
There has been a lot of discussion about weather this article should be deleted, redirected or merged. We need a consensus. I think that since she is mainly known for one event that it should redirect.
423:. Because there are two major events, I think the article should be kept. However, the article needs to be more encyclopedic. I helped the article a little bit, but it is a start-class article. --
284:, who happens to be independently notable, in 2010. But she was a somewhat notable animal trainer before that: the article features a picture of her in 2006, as well as a news interview from 2000.
474:
The general rule in many cases is to cover the event, not the person. However, if media coverage of both the event and the individual's role grow larger, separate articles may become justified.
522:
Are you seriously comparing a dead human being to an airplane? She wasn't "in the wrong place at the wrong time", she was doing her job. Which, again, prior-to-her-death references attest to.
871:
But when there is a single event the article is about said event not the person it happened to and pretty much all of this information already exists in the
Tilikum and Blackfish articles.
497:
what's already in two other articles. Again, there is NOTHING here that can't be found in the two articles already mentioned. Anyone actively searching for
Brancheau should be directed to
318:
notability outside of the event that put her name in the papers, so to speak. Further, Kendrick7's word choice above seems to suggest an agenda that wouldn't be compatible with a
123:
363:
process to do so. All I did was revert the blanking of the page, and then provide additional sources, where I could, after demands for better sourcing on the talk page.
164:
237:
257:
479:
BTW, the very first ref is from 2006, so your contention that "information before her death is still uncited" isn't quite true, as she was killed in 2010. --
608:
as mentioned above, seems best known and best connected to that, this could be kept but it still seems questionably better aside from the current content.
549:
It's not an emotional appeal to say that human beings are just as important as films and zoo animals. Yes, some of these details do already appear in both
773:
and others, but this is not about
Brancheau's "importance"; it is about her notability and the notability of her death, as Knowledge (XXG) uses the term.
359:
I agree that the "memorial" aspects of the page need to be cleaned up. Feel free to remove any uncited information; you don't need the permission of an
706:? because I assure you that you are doing it wrong. Yes, she's been lionized since her death, above and including events before her death. So what?
489:
In other words, frankly, it does NOTHING to satisfy notability prior to the incident with which she is indelibly connected. As a parallel, consider
130:
384:
But if you "clean up" the memorial aspect of it, all you're left with is the single event, which mostly duplicates the incident's coverage at
1047:
96:
91:
17:
100:
83:
185:
152:
645:
760:, trimming the biographical information that's unrelated to the event itself. I recognize that the event is covered in
1113:
40:
684:
As far as I can see solely for her death. Unless you've found something which shows that she was notable before that.
523:
285:
146:
614:
364:
327:
314:
976:
757:
217:
53:
1090:
1060:
1051:
1022:
992:
957:
909:
894:
880:
862:
837:
822:
808:
782:
738:
715:
693:
679:
660:
636:
619:
584:
569:
544:
529:
517:
483:
463:
432:
405:
375:
343:
302:
269:
249:
229:
142:
65:
1086:
1018:
1010:
953:
945:
287:
Her death has had a lasting legacy (which a click on the "news" link above confirms in the last week alone
1109:
890:
858:
656:
36:
753:
558:
192:
986:
802:
511:
457:
428:
399:
337:
61:
368:
634:
609:
490:
288:
178:
87:
675:
442:
still uncited and the info of and after her death already is in the two articles you mentioned,
389:
565:
while insisting her biographical details could be merged into either of 2 different events. --
1082:
1042:
1014:
1006:
949:
941:
905:
876:
833:
734:
689:
580:
540:
265:
245:
225:
206:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1108:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
319:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
886:
854:
550:
291:
158:
419:
This animal trainer is notable because she was killed by Tilikum and for being featured in
360:
999:
981:
797:
506:
476:
I'm not sure there exists a much larger media spotlight than a world-renowned documentary.
452:
424:
394:
354:
332:
57:
1041:
as the article subject's importance rests primarily on her death and its aftermath. ----
1038:
972:
968:
926:
814:
707:
562:
469:
323:
295:
294:). Dawn Brancheau wasn't just some random tourist who fell into a shark tank and as such
764:, but enough has been written about this particular death to justify a separate article.
1075:
1057:
819:
788:
778:
770:
761:
712:
629:
566:
554:
526:
498:
480:
443:
385:
372:
309:
299:
281:
79:
71:
671:
975:) that there is a direct correlation, then I would agree with an article rename to
901:
872:
829:
730:
701:
685:
628:
there is nothing innately notable about her life outside of her death by Tilikum.--
576:
536:
261:
241:
221:
202:
298:
should not apply; this plainly isn't a case for which that policy was created. --
117:
795:, and if there is something here, what is keeping it out of those articles? --
792:
774:
447:
925:
The foregoing keep arguments, including User:JaconaFrere, have it correct.
450:. What here is new and establishes notability outside of the one event? --
1056:
The proper place for a move discussion is on the article talk page. --
885:
That probably means the Dawn Brancheau article should be expanded.
813:
Again, the continued insistence, by at times the same editor, that
561:, I believe I'm only making an appeal to reason. You can't argue
1102:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
392:, which also is highly against Knowledge (XXG) guidelines. --
648:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
929:
reads, unlike some element or factor based benchmarks, as a
501:, since without the incident, nobody would know who she is.
367:
is not an excuse to throw the baby out with the bathwater;
979:
and all uncited material prior to the event removed. --
900:
followed. Maybe I'm wrong and we just haven't found it.
113:
109:
105:
177:
934:
video and the crime scene investigative images.(refs:
971:, and it has been posited by published sources (not
654:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
322:encyclopedia. This article is unnecessary by both
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1116:). No further edits should be made to this page.
828:support that Brancheau should have an article.
290:) in part by spawning a notable documentary (
8:
769:I sympathize with the feelings expressed by
256:Note: This debate has been included in the
238:list of Florida-related deletion discussions
236:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:This animal trainer was indeed murdered by
258:list of People-related deletion discussions
670:She continues to be covered in the press.
255:
235:
698:What policy are you trying to apply here
948:) 05:36, 7 April 2016 (UTC) (updated:
787:Question: What is here that is NOT in
1013:) 00:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC) (edited:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1037:but rename/refocus to her death per
24:
1:
209:) 18:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
967:If this information is from
1133:
1091:00:25, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
762:Tilikum (orca)#Third death
680:20:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
661:12:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
637:13:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
620:22:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
606:Redirect to Tilikum (orca)
585:11:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
570:04:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
545:01:13, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
530:00:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
518:13:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
484:01:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
464:18:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
433:18:31, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
406:14:02, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
376:02:25, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
344:14:57, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
303:02:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
270:01:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
250:01:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
66:13:20, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
1061:18:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
1052:06:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
1023:15:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
993:20:24, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
958:20:08, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
910:14:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
895:14:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
881:14:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
863:14:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
838:03:50, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
823:03:23, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
809:22:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
783:19:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
739:12:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
716:04:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
694:02:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
230:22:10, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
1105:Please do not modify it.
388:. That makes this a POV
32:Please do not modify it.
977:Death of Dawn Brancheau
758:Death of Dawn Brancheau
218:Death of Dawn Brancheau
54:Death of Dawn Brancheau
973:interpreted by editors
756:move over redirect to
625:Redirect to Tilikum
491:Flydubai Flight 981
282:one of her animals
663:
272:
252:
1124:
1107:
1079:
1003:
989:
984:
969:reliable sources
805:
800:
705:
659:
653:
651:
649:
632:
617:
612:
551:Blackfish (film)
514:
509:
460:
455:
402:
397:
358:
340:
335:
292:Blackfish (film)
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1114:deletion review
1103:
1073:
1050:
997:
987:
982:
803:
798:
771:User: Kendrick7
699:
664:
655:
644:
642:
630:
615:
610:
512:
507:
458:
453:
400:
395:
352:
338:
333:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1130:
1128:
1119:
1118:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1046:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
962:
961:
919:
918:
917:
916:
915:
914:
913:
912:
866:
865:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
789:Tilikum (orca)
766:
765:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
726:
722:
652:
641:
640:
639:
622:
611:SwisterTwister
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
555:Tilikum (orca)
502:
499:Tilikum (orca)
494:
477:
444:Tilikum (orca)
436:
435:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
386:Tilikum (orca)
379:
378:
365:WP:NOTMEMORIAL
347:
346:
328:WP:NOTMEMORIAL
310:Tilikum (orca)
305:
274:
273:
253:
199:
198:
135:
80:Dawn Brancheau
74:
72:Dawn Brancheau
69:
52:. and move to
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1129:
1117:
1115:
1111:
1106:
1100:
1099:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1077:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1062:
1059:
1055:
1054:
1053:
1049:
1048:contributions
1044:
1040:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1024:
1020:
1016:
1012:
1008:
1001:
996:
995:
994:
991:
990:
985:
978:
974:
970:
966:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
936:
932:
928:
924:
921:
920:
911:
907:
903:
898:
897:
896:
892:
888:
884:
883:
882:
878:
874:
870:
869:
868:
867:
864:
860:
856:
852:
849:
848:
839:
835:
831:
826:
825:
824:
821:
816:
812:
811:
810:
807:
806:
801:
794:
790:
786:
785:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
748:
740:
736:
732:
727:
723:
719:
718:
717:
714:
709:
703:
697:
696:
695:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
665:
662:
658:
657:North America
650:
647:
638:
635:
633:
626:
623:
621:
618:
613:
607:
604:
603:
586:
582:
578:
573:
572:
571:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
547:
546:
542:
538:
533:
532:
531:
528:
524:
521:
520:
519:
516:
515:
510:
503:
500:
495:
492:
487:
486:
485:
482:
478:
475:
471:
467:
466:
465:
462:
461:
456:
449:
445:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
414:
407:
404:
403:
398:
391:
387:
383:
382:
381:
380:
377:
374:
370:
366:
362:
356:
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
342:
341:
336:
329:
325:
321:
316:
312:
311:
306:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
286:
283:
279:
276:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
214:
210:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1104:
1101:
1083:FeatherPluma
1043:Patar knight
1034:
1015:FeatherPluma
1007:FeatherPluma
980:
950:FeatherPluma
942:FeatherPluma
930:
922:
850:
796:
749:
667:
643:
624:
605:
505:
473:
451:
420:
416:
393:
331:
307:
277:
212:
211:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
754:WP:ONEEVENT
559:WP:NOTPAPER
165:free images
1000:McDoobAU93
557:. But per
425:Frmorrison
369:WP:SOFIXIT
355:McDoobAU93
58:Sarahj2107
1110:talk page
1076:Kendrick7
1058:Kendrick7
931:weighting
820:Kendrick7
793:Blackfish
713:Kendrick7
567:Kendrick7
527:Kendrick7
481:Kendrick7
468:To quote
448:Blackfish
421:Blackfish
373:Kendrick7
308:Merge to
300:Kendrick7
262:• Gene93k
242:• Gene93k
37:talk page
1112:or in a
752:but per
721:article.
672:Bruriyah
646:Relisted
315:memorial
124:View log
39:or in a
902:*Treker
873:*Treker
830:*Treker
731:*Treker
702:*Treker
686:*Treker
577:*Treker
537:*Treker
320:neutral
222:*Treker
213:Comment
203:*Treker
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
983:McDoob
887:Jacona
855:Jacona
799:McDoob
791:or in
729:piece.
575:event.
508:McDoob
454:McDoob
396:McDoob
361:WP:AFD
334:McDoob
143:Google
101:delete
1039:WP:1E
927:WP:1E
815:WP:1E
708:WP:1E
563:WP:1E
470:WP:1E
371:. --
330:. --
324:WP:1E
296:WP:1E
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
1087:talk
1035:Keep
1019:talk
1011:talk
988:AU93
954:talk
946:talk
937:and
923:Keep
906:talk
891:talk
877:talk
859:talk
851:Keep
834:talk
804:AU93
779:talk
775:TJRC
750:Keep
735:talk
725:all.
690:talk
676:talk
668:Keep
616:talk
581:talk
553:and
541:talk
513:AU93
459:AU93
446:and
429:talk
417:Keep
401:AU93
390:fork
339:AU93
326:and
278:Keep
266:talk
246:talk
226:talk
207:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
50:keep
1045:- /
631:JOJ
525:--
193:TWL
122:– (
1089:)
1021:)
956:)
908:)
893:)
879:)
861:)
836:)
781:)
737:)
692:)
678:)
583:)
543:)
504:--
472::
431:)
268:)
260:.
248:)
240:.
228:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:.
1085:(
1078::
1074:@
1025:)
1017:(
1009:(
1002::
998:@
960:)
952:(
944:(
904:(
889:(
875:(
857:(
832:(
777:(
733:(
704::
700:@
688:(
674:(
579:(
539:(
427:(
357::
353:@
264:(
244:(
224:(
220:.
205:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.