310:, if it's frequently quoted by India's largest newspapers, which have a large potential readership, then it's likely to be notable. However, the article will need more improvements in its content. It's just too stubby.--
326:. The only single reference goes to primary source. The article can pass the notability criteria when there is an independent, reliable, non-trivial and non-autobiography secondary source. —
434:— I am strongly opposed to the use of "notability" as a justification of deletion of articles. In my experience the judgement that material is not "notable" is highly vulnerable to hidden
376:— I started this article. And I would like to suggest to the nominator that characterizing someone as being "transfixed" is an insulting phrase they should avoid using in future.
193:
234:
290:, and has very little original content. I still think it is useful to have an article, as it is being used as the URL of citations. It's not listed in the
218:, claim to notability made on website of paper. "Frequently quoted in the Hindu and the Times of India", which are two of India's largest papers.
450:, which are official policies, and less vulnerable to hidden systemic bias, than to rely on notability, which is not an official policy.
200:
NN newspaper, lack of multiple non-trivial sources about this paper. Prod was removed by creator, who is transfixed with
Guantanamo. --
17:
166:
161:
170:
528:(second query returns some ten results, but none are related to Daily India). As of now, the article doesn't seem to meet
522:
153:
559:
36:
520:
291:
558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
503:
quoted by India's largest newspapers, I'd like to see sources (other than it's own website). A quick search on
283:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
526:
510:
524:
514:
508:
499:. Being used by enwiki as a source is not good enough of a reason, as they syndicate UPI stories. If it's
85:
Comment — I am strongly opposed to the use of "notability" as a justification of deletion of articles...
544:
512:
487:
474:
454:
424:
396:
380:
364:
348:
337:
314:
298:
273:
259:
243:
222:
209:
135:
157:
91:, and at the moment, notability stands sufficiently in the community as a reason to delete an article.
536:. If any secondary, reliable sources are provided for claims of notability, I'll change my vote.
402:
88:
78:
541:
517:
413:
please. Wiki articles cannot be used as sources. All wiki articles must have reliable sources. —
149:
141:
129:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
529:
480:
460:
439:
323:
533:
443:
484:
468:
418:
358:
331:
240:
219:
101:
independant source (the only link, pretending to be a reference as a footnote, pointed to
447:
410:
252:
479:
Reply: secondary sources are not all available online in the third world. Please read
406:
124:
120:
56:
537:
451:
435:
393:
377:
65:— this was basically withdrawn, as Y refuted it successfully and John noted as such.
278:
From my quick investigation, I now see what crazyness you mean. It syndicates from
187:
389:
345:
311:
295:
269:
256:
205:
392:
says, it is useful to have articles on the publications we use as references.
255:
as a source, so it is in our readers interest to inform them about the source.
464:
414:
354:
327:
97:— indeed, that is correct. However, the article when I closed this debate had
504:
294:
top 100 for India, so I am finding myself without a leg to stand on here.
95:
Reply: secondary sources are not all available online in the third world...
127:
when compared to the above refutals, the consensus here stands at delete.
507:
website doesn't tell me that it's frequently quoted by the newspaper.
266:
202:
353:
Show me then the secondary sources, then I will change my vote. —
552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
287:
55:— doesn't say that any more, and even so, I don't see a source.
279:
107:
104:
264:
That's crazy. They syndicate UPI stories. So can anyone. --
344:
And you believe that one cant be found for this newspaper?
183:
179:
175:
48:. For clarification, here's why I closed it like this:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
87:— not up for debate here. That's an argument for
562:). No further edits should be made to this page.
75:Keep — As John Vandenberg says, it is useful...
8:
463:? It's one of the official WP guidelines. —
69:Weak Keep, if it's frequently quoted by...
63:Keep. It is used by enwiki as a source...
233:: This debate has been included in the
121:foundation principle of Knowledge (XXG)
77:— refuted, echoing the sentiments of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
459:Comment. Why not? Have you read
438:. It is far better to rely on
235:list of India-related deletions
401:Comment. A classic example of
1:
119:So, all in all, applying the
53:Keep, claim to notability...
483:before commenting further.
579:
555:Please do not modify it.
284:Asian News International
136:10:07, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
545:17:38, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
488:22:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
475:08:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
455:06:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
425:08:13, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
397:06:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
381:06:48, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
365:10:32, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
349:10:04, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
338:09:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
315:22:44, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
299:08:19, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
274:16:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
260:09:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
244:09:25, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
223:09:06, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
210:18:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
71:— see the first one.
518:The Times of India
516:. Same goes for
251:. It is used by
238:
570:
557:
471:
421:
361:
334:
229:
191:
173:
132:
113:(official site)"
34:
578:
577:
573:
572:
571:
569:
568:
567:
566:
560:deletion review
553:
469:
419:
390:John Vandenberg
359:
346:John Vandenberg
332:
296:John Vandenberg
257:John Vandenberg
164:
148:
145:
130:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
576:
574:
565:
564:
548:
547:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
429:
428:
427:
383:
370:
369:
368:
367:
341:
340:
317:
305:
304:
303:
302:
301:
246:
226:
225:
198:
197:
144:
139:
117:
116:
92:
82:
72:
66:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
575:
563:
561:
556:
550:
549:
546:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
525:
523:
521:
519:
515:
513:
511:
509:
506:
502:
498:
495:
489:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
472:
466:
462:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
436:systemic bias
433:
430:
426:
422:
416:
412:
408:
405:. Read again
404:
400:
399:
398:
395:
391:
387:
384:
382:
379:
375:
372:
371:
366:
362:
356:
352:
351:
350:
347:
343:
342:
339:
335:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
313:
309:
306:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
272:
271:
268:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
242:
236:
232:
228:
227:
224:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
207:
204:
195:
189:
185:
181:
177:
172:
168:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
143:
140:
138:
137:
134:
133:
131:Daniel Bryant
126:
122:
114:
111:
110:
106:
105:
100:
96:
93:
90:
86:
83:
80:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
50:
49:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
554:
551:
500:
496:
431:
385:
373:
319:
307:
265:
248:
230:
215:
201:
199:
128:
118:
112:
109:
102:
98:
94:
84:
74:
68:
62:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
320:Weak delete
150:Daily India
142:Daily India
108:Daily India
501:frequently
485:Hornplease
374:Disclaimer
241:Hornplease
220:Hornplease
125:supplement
505:The Hindu
403:WP:USEFUL
308:Weak Keep
123:and its'
79:WP:USEFUL
538:utcursch
452:Geo Swan
394:Geo Swan
378:Geo Swan
194:View log
530:WP:CORP
481:WP:BIAS
461:WP:CORP
440:wp:npov
432:Comment
324:WP:CORP
167:protect
162:history
534:WP:WEB
497:Delete
444:wp:nor
322:, per
312:Kylohk
253:enwiki
171:delete
46:delete
470:reply
465:Indon
448:wp:rs
420:reply
415:Indon
411:WP:RS
388:— As
360:reply
355:Indon
333:reply
328:Indon
292:Alexa
188:views
180:watch
176:links
16:<
542:talk
473:) —
446:and
423:) —
409:and
407:WP:V
386:Keep
363:) —
336:) —
288:IANS
286:and
270:not?
249:Keep
231:Note
216:Keep
206:not?
184:logs
158:talk
154:edit
89:WT:N
57:WP:V
532:or
280:UPI
239:--
237:.
192:– (
540:|
442:,
282:,
186:|
182:|
178:|
174:|
169:|
165:|
160:|
156:|
115:).
99:no
467:(
417:(
357:(
330:(
267:Y
203:Y
196:)
190:)
152:(
103:"
81:.
59:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.