305:
the same terms. It's hard for me to find anything at all on the song that's not referencing the sequence in the movie. When I google the song title with the names of the bands I only get track listings on about three sites, but no review or mention of the song from a third party source. Please actually give us the LINKS you're seeing so we know what you're talking about.--
304:
We must be seeing very different things. In my searches googling the terms "Dammit Janet" "Dammit Janet Song" and "Dammit Janet Cover" nothing comes up except Rocky Horror pages, song lyrics and family guy. I can't find the covers you're talking about. I also can't find anything on google books using
198:
It's notable, it is just a stub like most songs on wikipedia. It just needs improvement to meet the proposed guidelines I'd guess, but we'll never know, because someone prefers it not to be improved. over 13000 google hits for this song under this title, covers of the song from productions on all
276:
all i did was google and then scan the first two pages, you have a good start there, as it covered european covers and australian covers of the soundtrack. of course, 297 including 10 or more independent references of this duet in books.google.com is somewhat significant, too. --13:32, 1 October
263:
Buridan, can you please give us links to the sources you've found so we can better understand your argument? I haven't been able to find anything besides lists of the song lyrics, Rocky Horror tribute and info pages (about the show in general) and pages about the family guy episode of the same name
211:
The song isn't notable outside of rocky horror. It's never charted as a single, no bands (major label) have covered it, the song itself is not covered in the news without mention of rocky horror. It just doesn't cut it. It's part of an original thearical musical score and is like having a unique
248:
Nothing, if they're notable. A good example would be "One Night in
Bangkok" from the musical Chess, the song is probably better known than the musical. Dammit, Janet isn't influencial beyond the musical it was a part
264:(which I understand is a reference to the song, but then we have to judge whether it's a reference to Rocky Horror in general or the song itself... which isn't an argument either side will be able to win)--
115:
355:
88:
83:
17:
129:
independently notable. The notability of Rocky Horror does not extend to every song from its score or soundtrack. Does not meet the
92:
75:
292:
375:
36:
374:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
360:
337:
309:
280:
268:
253:
238:
224:
203:
190:
178:
141:
57:
351:
151:
155:
134:
48:. Well, as much as I enjoy the film and song, consensus has spoken loud and clear. --User:Ceyockey (
79:
186:
per nom, and because it is unlikely that the song on its own is discussed in independent works. --
51:
130:
346:
306:
288:
265:
250:
221:
213:
161:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
333:
It saddens me to say, but it doesn't satisfy the current guidelines for song notability.--
187:
125:- prod removed, claiming that the song is independently notable. The song, however, is
71:
63:
334:
138:
284:
235:
200:
199:
continents and most countries, seems to meet the guidelines, just needs improved.--
109:
158:; just because it's part of a notable TV show doesn't mean its notable.
217:
133:
at WP:MUSIC. I love the movie as much as anyone but the fact that
368:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105:
101:
97:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
378:). No further edits should be made to this page.
234:what's wrong with that if they are notable?--
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
338:23:23, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
225:21:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
204:20:51, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
191:18:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
179:17:42, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
142:17:27, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
212:article for every song from
137:doesn't warrant an article.
131:proposed guideline for songs
361:17:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
310:00:14, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
269:07:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
254:05:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
239:04:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
58:16:31, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
395:
371:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
359:
296:
283:comment added by
214:Chicago (musical)
55:
386:
373:
349:
278:
174:
170:
167:
164:
113:
95:
49:
34:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
382:
376:deletion review
369:
172:
168:
165:
162:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
392:
390:
381:
380:
364:
363:
340:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
307:Torchwood Who?
266:Torchwood Who?
251:Torchwood Who?
228:
227:
222:Torchwood Who?
206:
193:
181:
120:
119:
72:Dammit, Janet!
66:
64:Dammit, Janet!
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
379:
377:
372:
366:
365:
362:
357:
353:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
332:
329:
328:
311:
308:
303:
300:
299:
298:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
275:
272:
271:
270:
267:
262:
259:
258:
257:
256:
255:
252:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
233:
230:
229:
226:
223:
219:
215:
210:
207:
205:
202:
197:
194:
192:
189:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
175:
157:
153:
149:
146:
145:
144:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
124:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
54:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
370:
367:
347:CRGreathouse
342:
330:
301:
277:2007 (UTC)
273:
260:
245:
231:
208:
195:
183:
160:
159:
152:WP:INHERITED
147:
126:
122:
121:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
279:—Preceding
156:WP:ILIKEIT
135:WP:ILIKEIT
52:talk to me
345:per nom.
302:Follow up
188:Paul Erik
335:Sethacus
293:contribs
281:unsigned
139:Otto4711
116:View log
285:Buridan
274:comment
246:comment
236:Buridan
232:comment
201:Buridan
89:protect
84:history
343:Delete
331:Delete
209:Delete
184:Delete
148:Delete
123:Delete
93:delete
46:Delete
249:of.--
218:Annie
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
289:talk
261:Also
220:. --
196:Keep
154:and
150:per
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
216:or
171:Fan
127:not
114:– (
354:|
295:)
291:•
173:24
169:AR
166:SC
163:NA
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
358:)
356:c
352:t
350:(
287:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.