376:
per established consensus. This award just isn't enough to confer inherent notability. I have encountered dozens or maybe even hundreds of articles like this and I never understood how they could pass the notability standards. It's time for a massive nomination of hundreds to thousands of these
342:. Although this individual's actions are highly admirable, being a recipient of the Distinguished Service Cross is not quite notable enough in itself per Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines. Also, there is an extreme lack of available sources as Skinny87 states. Cheers,
359:. He would have to have had at least one other award at this level to be considered for an article unless he did something else notable. A holder of a first tier decoration is inherently notable; a holder of a second tier decoration is not. --
169:
317:
I feel a bit bad voting delete on this page, but as per Wiki policy I don't think this is up to scratch. Maybe in the future a list could be created of second-tier military decoration awardees
163:
377:
articles. If the award is so prevalent that at least one person in a high percentage of small communities have received it, then it's probably too broad for
Knowledge (XXG) to cover.
124:
97:
92:
101:
84:
129:
241:
184:
151:
145:
413:
390:
368:
351:
326:
309:
288:
259:
232:
215:
66:
17:
141:
275:, as it is only referenced at this time by a single website (which is nearly copied in whole or part by the article itself), or
191:
398:- I don't think they need mass nominated, they can just be speedied as non-notable per GNG and the WP:MILHISTORY guidelines.
88:
80:
72:
430:
36:
284:
157:
244:
for another such article. Looks like there are hundreds of these to be cleaned up once that AfD runs it's course.
406:
252:
429:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
205:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
347:
280:
276:
399:
384:
364:
245:
229:
212:
177:
343:
305:
49:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
322:
335:
297:
272:
379:
360:
226:
209:
268:
201:
339:
301:
118:
300:, not to mention the fact that this wqas only a second-tier military decoration.
318:
208:
etc), rather than second level (DSC etc) are inherently notable in isolation.
267:, although the subject's service is honorable and commendable, it is
200:
WP:MILHIST consensus has established that only first level awards (
423:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
296:- No reliable sources give more than trivial coverage, so fails
114:
110:
106:
176:
242:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Henry_Blomberg
190:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
433:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
81:Daniel Martin (United States Army)
73:Daniel Martin (United States Army)
24:
1:
414:03:43, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
391:13:18, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
369:14:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
352:04:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
327:17:48, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
310:13:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
289:13:32, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
260:12:46, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
233:12:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
216:12:06, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
67:04:02, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
450:
426:Please do not modify it.
206:Hero of the Soviet Union
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
281:RightCowLeftCoast
441:
428:
410:
404:
387:
382:
256:
250:
195:
194:
180:
132:
122:
104:
64:
34:
449:
448:
444:
443:
442:
440:
439:
438:
437:
431:deletion review
424:
408:
402:Canterbury Tail
400:
385:
380:
254:
248:Canterbury Tail
246:
137:
128:
95:
79:
76:
60:
56:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
447:
445:
436:
435:
419:
418:
417:
416:
371:
354:
329:
312:
291:
262:
235:
225:as nominator.
202:Victoria Cross
198:
197:
134:
130:AfD statistics
75:
70:
58:
54:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
446:
434:
432:
427:
421:
420:
415:
412:
411:
405:
403:
397:
394:
393:
392:
389:
388:
383:
375:
372:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
353:
349:
345:
344:Abraham, B.S.
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
313:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
261:
258:
257:
251:
249:
243:
239:
236:
234:
231:
228:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:(categories)
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
126:
120:
116:
112:
108:
103:
99:
94:
90:
86:
82:
78:
77:
74:
71:
69:
68:
65:
63:
62:
61:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
425:
422:
407:
401:
395:
378:
373:
356:
331:
314:
293:
277:WP:MILPEOPLE
264:
253:
247:
237:
222:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
53:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
164:free images
361:Necrothesp
227:Buckshot06
210:Buckshot06
57:rbitrarily
334:per nom,
302:Skinny87
125:View log
396:Comment
269:notable
170:WP refs
158:scholar
98:protect
93:history
374:Delete
357:Delete
336:WP:GNG
332:Delete
319:DRosin
315:Delete
298:WP:GNG
294:Delete
273:WP:GNG
265:Delete
240:- see
238:Delete
230:(talk)
223:Delete
213:(talk)
142:Google
102:delete
46:delete
386:broil
381:Royal
185:JSTOR
146:books
119:views
111:watch
107:links
16:<
409:talk
365:talk
348:talk
340:WP:V
338:and
323:talk
306:talk
285:talk
279:. --
271:per
255:talk
178:FENS
152:news
115:logs
89:talk
85:edit
192:TWL
127:•
123:– (
367:)
350:)
325:)
308:)
287:)
204:,
172:)
117:|
113:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
48:.
363:(
346:(
321:(
304:(
283:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
121:)
83:(
59:0
55:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.