Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Daniel Reid - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

169: 276:. The link titled "Alarge collection of up to date articles and News on Daniel P Deid" is 404. Says it all, really. I know quackery reasonably well, this is not a notable quack. 122: 245: 231: 259: 217: 163: 335:. What is the point of deleting this page of a noted author on his field with over 20 main stream publications? What is the value to lose this article? KEEP!-- 129: 17: 373: 95: 90: 99: 184: 367: 151: 82: 437: 40: 319: 302: 413: 145: 392: 205: 433: 141: 36: 417: 396: 344: 323: 306: 289: 265: 251: 237: 223: 209: 64: 340: 315: 298: 409: 191: 177: 388: 201: 200:
A prolific author. But has anyone paid the amount of independent coverage needed to met BLPN?
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
432:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
86: 358: 336: 157: 55: 284: 278: 116: 354: 78: 70: 333:
Here is an updated archive of Media references and articles on subject
426:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
332: 112: 108: 104: 176: 314:, couldn't find anything on Google News or Scholar.-- 190: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 440:). No further edits should be made to this page. 297:not enough reliable sources to show notability. 246:list of California-related deletion discussions 232:list of Literature-related deletion discussions 260:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 8: 258:Note: This debate has been included in the 244:Note: This debate has been included in the 230:Note: This debate has been included in the 218:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 216:Note: This debate has been included in the 357:the big Knowledge (XXG) rubber mallet, but 257: 243: 229: 215: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 361:states, "If a topic has received 1: 65:18:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC) 418:01:09, 9 January 2018 (UTC) 397:23:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 345:16:27, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 324:07:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 307:00:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC) 290:18:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 266:16:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 252:16:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 238:16:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 224:16:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 210:16:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC) 457: 429:Please do not modify it. 381:These are... ...not. 32:Please do not modify it. 363:significant coverage 262:. Happy New Year!!! 248:. Happy New Year!!! 234:. Happy New Year!!! 220:. Happy New Year!!! 299:John Pack Lambert 288: 268: 254: 240: 226: 63: 448: 431: 368:reliable sources 282: 195: 194: 180: 132: 120: 102: 62: 60: 53: 34: 456: 455: 451: 450: 449: 447: 446: 445: 444: 438:deletion review 427: 316:Farang Rak Tham 137: 128: 93: 77: 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 454: 452: 443: 442: 422: 421: 410:Cavalryman V31 402: 401: 400: 399: 379: 376:of the subject 348: 347: 326: 309: 292: 270: 269: 255: 241: 227: 198: 197: 134: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 453: 441: 439: 435: 430: 424: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 404: 403: 398: 394: 390: 387: 384: 380: 377: 375: 370: 369: 364: 360: 356: 352: 351: 350: 349: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 325: 321: 317: 313: 310: 308: 304: 300: 296: 293: 291: 286: 281: 280: 275: 272: 271: 267: 264: 261: 256: 253: 250: 247: 242: 239: 236: 233: 228: 225: 222: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 131: 127: 124: 118: 114: 110: 106: 101: 97: 92: 88: 84: 80: 76: 75: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 428: 425: 405: 389:Andy Dingley 385: 382: 372: 366: 362: 328: 311: 294: 277: 273: 263: 249: 235: 221: 202:Andy Dingley 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 125: 57: 49: 47: 31: 28: 374:independent 355:to pull out 164:free images 79:Daniel Reid 71:Daniel Reid 337:Rickbrown9 58:Sandstein 434:talk page 408:per nom. 371:that are 37:talk page 436:or in a 123:View log 39:or in a 353:I hate 170:WP refs 158:scholar 96:protect 91:history 406:Delete 359:WP:GNG 312:Delete 295:Delete 274:Delete 142:Google 100:delete 50:delete 285:Help! 185:JSTOR 146:books 130:Stats 117:views 109:watch 105:links 16:< 414:talk 393:talk 386:Not. 383:Not. 341:talk 329:KEEP 320:talk 303:talk 206:talk 178:FENS 152:news 113:logs 87:talk 83:edit 365:in 279:Guy 192:TWL 121:– ( 416:) 395:) 378:". 343:) 331:, 322:) 305:) 208:) 172:) 115:| 111:| 107:| 103:| 98:| 94:| 89:| 85:| 52:. 420:. 412:( 391:( 339:( 318:( 301:( 287:) 283:( 204:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 126:· 119:) 81:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Sandstein
18:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Daniel Reid
Daniel Reid
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Andy Dingley
talk
16:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.