166:
www.johnjosephkennedy.com), so we know this will become even more newsworthy as time goes by. We have a national campaign staff of hundreds of members (required in order to have electors and register in all of the states). If you want us to prove it, give me your phone number and we can have over 100 people call you in a matter of minutes since we do weekly conference calls with all of the staff.
100:. Hey guys, sorry about the appearance of "vanity"; the apparent obscurity; and the apparency of a deliberate "Point-of-View (POV?)". The story is legit and the candidates were registered in virtually every state with the Secretary of State's offices (those states which allow "write-in candidates") as can be seen at:
170:
homepage. We apologize if we have fumbled it up. We are still learning your system. We can clean it up and put it under one article name (preferably "Daniel Robert Rezac" and redirect the others to this one) if you give us the chance to make the correction and still allow it to be posted on the wiki.
161:
However, maybe this article should be represented on the wikipedia under another topic and refined as more of a research article. We would be open to suggestions. Our campaign staff is still learning the "wikipedia" forum and would like to have this article posted similar to "Patrick
Fitzgerald",
169:
We published it under different article names (Daniel Robert Rezac, Dan Rezac, Daniel R Rezac, and Daniel Rezac) because your search engine does not pull it up unless it is an "identical" match and we don't care to have it under the login name of "Drezac", which is why it is identical to the user
157:
The above are just a few of the 8,600+ references on the 'net which prove the legitimacy of the publication. For a "non-biased" group, you guys are pretty quick to declare something a hoax or a fraud and do a poor job of research given that the candidates are registered on dozens of government
165:
John Joseph
Kennedy was the candidate who ran for President, is a direct descendant of Francis Michael Kennedy (first Kennedy in U.S. politics who served as a Congressman in South Carolina House of Reps in 1882-1886), is related to the Kennedys of Boston, and is running for 2008 (see
162:
which is the format we followed. The original user's page (drezac) was created as a means to access the wiki and publish the "profile" of this Vp candidate. The "source watch" issue is because we are still learning your system and followed the
Patrick Fitzgerald format.
211:
If not a hoax, then vanity that reads like a resume or brochure: "Rezac married his college sweetheart, Lenore, on
September 21, 2002 in the beautiful outdoor settings of the floral "sunken" gardens in Lincoln, Nebraska." etc
84:(Nomination moved back to top of page. Please do not post comments or votes above the nomination; it makes it hard for people to see the original reason for nomination for deletion. Put all discussion and votes at the
76:
Duplicate of User:Drezac's user page. I'm also unsure of the notability of write-in candidates, and the author's username raises some vanity concerns. Still, I'm hesitant to speedy this. --
183:. Many of the links were bogus, and there is much POV about a real, if obscure, write in candidate from the 2004 US presidential race. Not a speedy, but not a keeper either. --
239:
Vote withdrawn for now; apparently he did run as a write-in candidate for vice president, but his running mate was just someone named
Kennedy and not a member of the famous
17:
288:
36:
273:
261:
247:
233:
229:
family ran for president in 2004 as a write-in candidate with this person as their vice-presidential candidate. --
216:
203:
187:
80:
52:
113:
287:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
240:
137:
119:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
196:
116:
131:
134:
58:
125:
122:
184:
66:
244:
230:
158:
websites as given above, which is all the more reason why the article should be in the wikipedia.
70:
49:
140:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
152:
149:
258:
195:, apparant hoax. Sourcewatch article(s) do not exist. If it's not a hoax it's at least {{
77:
213:
200:
171:
146:
143:
128:
114:
http://www.elections.state.md.us/current_election/cand/cand-list.php?input=001
107:
104:
138:
http://www.co.fort-bend.tx.us/County_Services/elections/Candidates_Gen04.pdf
120:
http://www.mdarchives.state.md.us/msa/mdmanual/42electg/html/2004/04usp.html
110:
117:
http://www.elections.state.md.us/current_election/cand/cand-list-print.php
88:
of this page, or else underneath comments you are directly responding to.
270:
132:
http://www1.co.weber.ut.us/Clerk_Auditor/Election/results/2004general.php
89:
135:
http://www1.co.weber.ut.us/Clerk_Auditor/Election/results/election04.php
226:
126:
http://www.co.summit.co.us/Elections/2004/2004_Official_Results.htm
123:
http://www.carboncountyutah.com/elections/nov2004/indexnov2004.htm
281:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
225:
as unverifiable or hoax. None of the members of the famous
141:
http://loganco.gov/clerk/November22004GenElectionResults.htm
153:
http://newslinkindiana.com/election2004/00000003993.html
150:
http://newslinkindiana.com/election2004/00000004029.html
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
291:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
147:http://www.co.juab.ut.us/County/ETNETCUM.HTM
144:http://www.sos.state.mn.us/docs/electors.pdf
129:http://elections.utah.gov/2004candidates.htm
108:http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G04/MN.phtml
105:http://www.thegreenpapers.com/G04/CO.phtml
111:http://www.beaver.state.ut.us/FINAL04.HTM
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
44:The result of the debate was
274:00:12, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
262:16:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
248:23:59, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
234:16:07, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
217:10:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
204:09:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
188:09:32, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
81:09:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
53:15:43, 4 November 2005 (UTC)
308:
284:Please do not modify it.
241:Kennedy political family
32:Please do not modify it.
59:Daniel Robert Rezac
299:
286:
34:
307:
306:
302:
301:
300:
298:
297:
296:
295:
289:deletion review
282:
197:TotallyDisputed
74:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
305:
303:
294:
293:
277:
276:
264:
252:
251:
250:
245:Metropolitan90
231:Metropolitan90
219:
206:
190:
176:
102:
101:
73:
67:Daniel R Rezac
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
304:
292:
290:
285:
279:
278:
275:
272:
268:
265:
263:
260:
256:
253:
249:
246:
242:
238:
237:
236:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
218:
215:
210:
207:
205:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:
177:
174:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
124:
121:
118:
115:
112:
109:
106:
99:
96:
95:
94:
93:
91:
87:
82:
79:
72:
68:
64:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
283:
280:
269:as per nom.
266:
257:, as above.
254:
222:
221:
208:
192:
180:
175:
168:
164:
160:
156:
103:
97:
85:
83:
75:
71:Daniel Rezac
45:
43:
31:
28:
259:Lincolnite
185:Fire Star
63:Dan Rezac
98:Addition
227:Kennedy
78:Alan Au
267:Delete
255:Delete
223:Delete
214:Indium
209:Delete
201:Alphax
193:Delete
181:Delete
172:Drezac
46:delete
16:<
243:. --
199:}}.
69:and
48:. -
271:MCB
90:MCB
86:end
65:,
61:,
92:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.