433:
a bit complicated, especially in higher resolutions. Also, the enemy intelligence very immature, so that it is only worthwhile to stand against human players." It's of precious little use. Though I'd normally be very happy to see IndieGames used as a source, this one is a cross-posting from a backwater site. The review is also poorly written, the opening sentence: "Dark Oberon is a solid programmed RTS-game with unique
432:
lacks the multiple reliable secondary sources to satisfy notability. The only secondary source in the article worth a damn is the Chip listing, which is a couple of sentences culminating in "However, you should (not yet) expect too much. The units are not yet fully animated, and the control is still
344:. The game is talked about much more than it is written about in journals, so its notability isn't solid. As it passes into community nostalgia, I'm confident that its influence on later projects will become better documented. If it wasn't open-source, there'd be no shortage of articles about it.--
128:
Article is regularly proposed for deletion, so might be an idea to discuss here and get it settled one way or the other. The main issue is notability - The game has not been the subject of significant, reliable, third-party coverage. The closest thing seems to be
180:
development - it may be a nice game, but doesn't even have a single player mode, and no servers setup on the internet for multiplayer use! The only references to it are a (very brief) German magazine article, which is pretty old, an entry on a WWW site listing
239:). The particular weaknesses of the software do not go to notability and are not at issue in the least. The article clearly needs further referencing, however. I would recommend adding "Expand" and "Refimprove" tags and seeing how things progress from there. -
121:
153:
437:." I like to argue the reliability case for the more usable sites dealing with indie gaming in general, but I wouldn't touch this one with a bargepole.
185:
open source games for Linux ever created - and what appear to be 3 spam references portable menu systems for USB drives... Which only repackage an
196:
17:
223:
magazine article listed above) and even a few scholarly articles (e.g. the game is discussed in
Marianna Luxardo's thesis entitled
53:
295:
88:
83:
92:
75:
459:
36:
49:
441:
458:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
200:
192:
391:
349:
367:
329:
303:
262:
161:
138:
444:
424:
395:
383:
371:
353:
333:
307:
289:
266:
248:
204:
165:
142:
57:
79:
438:
230:
409:
71:
63:
387:
345:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
363:
325:
299:
285:
258:
244:
157:
134:
216:
277:
254:
235:
130:
225:
407:- Ghits aren't notability. No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. ▫
109:
281:
240:
298:, though. But perhaps IndieGames.com partially reprinting it makes it usable.
229:, and is covered in some minor depth in Arild Johan Jensen's and Håvard Nes'
319:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
452:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
219:
with mention on several review sites (including the German
280:
IndieGames.com review is OK-ish. It needs more, though.
116:
105:
101:
97:
294:
That's not bad. The source of the review is actually
226:
I videoclip dei Tool fra animazione e sperimentazione
189:
program, and don't even include it in their suites!
324:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
253:Have these student theses been peer-reviewed (per
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
462:). No further edits should be made to this page.
154:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
176:- Not notable software. It's still under
152:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
358:Isn't that an argument for
479:
425:20:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
396:11:41, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
372:11:31, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
354:15:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
334:00:17, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
308:08:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
290:23:20, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
267:08:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
249:19:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
205:11:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
166:13:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
143:13:49, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
455:Please do not modify it.
445:11:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
296:this self-published site
58:06:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
236:The Personality Module
50:Backslash Forwardslash
384:WP:DEADLINE#View two
231:University of Bergen
133:in CHIP magazine.
131:this short writeup
44:The result was
336:
215:- I see over 10k
195:comment added by
168:
470:
457:
421:
418:
415:
412:
323:
321:
233:thesis entitled
207:
187:already portable
148:
119:
113:
95:
34:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
469:
468:
467:
466:
460:deletion review
453:
419:
416:
413:
410:
317:
190:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
476:
474:
465:
464:
448:
447:
427:
401:
400:
399:
398:
377:
376:
375:
374:
338:
337:
322:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
271:
270:
269:
209:
208:
170:
169:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
475:
463:
461:
456:
450:
449:
446:
443:
440:
436:
431:
428:
426:
423:
422:
406:
403:
402:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
320:
316:
315:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
292:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
237:
232:
228:
227:
222:
218:
214:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:211.54.10.162
194:
188:
184:
179:
175:
172:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
454:
451:
434:
429:
408:
404:
388:AuthorityTam
359:
346:AuthorityTam
341:
318:
273:
234:
224:
220:
212:
186:
182:
177:
173:
149:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
364:Marasmusine
326:Ron Ritzman
300:Marasmusine
259:Marasmusine
191:—Preceding
158:Marasmusine
135:Marasmusine
72:Dark Oberon
64:Dark Oberon
382:More like
342:Weak Keep
360:deletion
193:unsigned
122:View log
442:another
439:Someone
435:grafics
274:Comment
89:protect
84:history
430:Delete
411:Johnny
405:Delete
282:SharkD
241:Thibbs
217:G-hits
174:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
46:delete
255:WP:RS
178:heavy
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
392:talk
386:. --
368:talk
350:talk
330:talk
304:talk
286:talk
278:This
263:talk
245:talk
221:CHIP
213:Keep
201:talk
162:talk
150:Note
139:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
48:. \
417:Nin
257:)?
183:all
52:/ {
420:ja
414:Mr
394:)
370:)
362:?
352:)
332:)
306:)
288:)
276:-
265:)
247:)
203:)
164:)
156:.
141:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:}
390:(
366:(
348:(
328:(
302:(
284:(
261:(
243:(
199:(
160:(
137:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.