468:, such as self promotion on Facebook and Youtube. This is pretty much a definition of what an internet neologism looks like. That is not to say that it does not exist in some sense, just that this is not evidence that it is yet notable for an encyclopedia. I cannot comment on the Portuguese book, as I cannot read the context and in any case this is the English Knowledge. The journal article is more of an issue and probably the best argument for notability. The journal calls itself "a peer-reviewed, open-access e-journal for the study of electronic dance music culture" and looks like one in the way it is set out, but the article does not read like an academic article. It is full of serious grammatical errors and unsupported (and frankly unsupportable) statements. Most strikingly it is only 1,250 words long - which makes for a very, very short academic article. I am not sure if we should take this as a reliable source, but it may be useful for those who have commented previously to give an opinion on this. I remain open to being convinced, but cannot change my delete at this time. There is still insufficient evidence of notability.--
386:
520:
for instance). This is a totally different issue to notability and verifiability, which must also be met for inclusion here of course. But it is unrealistic to expect to find a large corpora of scholarly articles on such subjects. The vast majority of music articles on
Knowledge get by on far less
490:
As I was reading the article, I was confused as well, but I just figured that's how all music journals were since I'd never read one. The article is written like a personal essay more than an article for an esteemed journal. It only cites three references, none of which are other journal articles, so
359:
would be my recommendation, but alternatively keep it. User
Spinningspark found a journal article which offers significant coverage of the topic, but I do not think we have enough sources to write a full article about this specific topic; I think it is better represented in the context of the
541:
Around eleven o'clock, former politicial and military stunted girl's father had left behind all the allure of colored lights and haunted dark psytrance, and, in the relative calm of camping, de-dicaram to a exciting combat "lock" until four in the
390:
491:
it does not build on existing research. There are no footnotes, which is actually not surprising given the content of the article. Additionally, there is no direct contact email for the author. I think we should consider the journal
511:
I did not point out the number of ghits because I thought they were all reliable. Most of them are probably no use for verifying any facts. Rather, I quoted the quarter of million figure to show that the term was
530:
There is no policy against foreign language sources at
Knowledge, in fact, a worldwide encyclopaedia will kind of require them if it is achieve its goals. Those of us that cannot read the language are required to
180:
229:
Google searches indicate that it does exist. If some can be found that are "reliable sources" then the article should be kept. Of course it can't be kept without sources, but the topic seems notable enough.
513:
133:
626:. It certainly exists, but what we lack is verifiable detail that would support a standalone article. It can be summarized adequately at the Psychedelic trance article. --
174:
79:
248:
581:(French) but seems unable to retrieve the full page. All this shows at the very least that this is a worldwide phenomenon and not a simple neologism.
464:- A quarter of a million ghits are not really relevant to a debate about notability, since they seem to consist of things that are explicitly not
140:
538:
That edition of
Trancendence, the two also had the honor of commanding the CDJ's main runway for an hour and a half of intense dark psytrance.
106:
101:
110:
93:
17:
566:
195:
599:
None of those sources appear to provide significant coverage. Though I do agree with you regarding using foreign sources. --
162:
654:
40:
156:
535:
of those that can. Here are two snippets from a (not very good) machine translation of the
Portuguese book;
588:
420:
337:
635:
608:
594:
504:
483:
452:
426:
377:
343:
307:
280:
260:
239:
220:
152:
63:
276:
235:
650:
36:
202:
216:
516:. That is, the term is actually in general use; the criterion for inclusion in dictionaries (see
401:
188:
97:
623:
604:
583:
500:
415:
373:
361:
356:
332:
51:
517:
478:
302:
272:
256:
231:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
649:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
631:
492:
436:
317:
168:
289:
211:
Seems to be mostly original research, can't find credible sources to suggest this exists.
570:
562:
447:
89:
69:
600:
532:
496:
369:
554:
471:
465:
295:
252:
57:
288:
Cannot see any reliable sources on a Google search and none in the article. Fails
127:
627:
558:
439:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
320:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
393:(Portuguese) uses the term. And this journal article on the subject,
643:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
573:(Portuguese). Gnews is also showing snippets of articles in
402:"The inverted sublimity of the dark psytrance dance floor"
123:
119:
115:
271:
as lacking reliable sources that describe what it is.
187:
406:
Dancecult: Journal of
Electronic Dance Music Culture
446:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
413:I would have thought counted as a reliable source.
327:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
553:There are also a few sources thrown up in gnews;
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
657:). No further edits should be made to this page.
495:unless and until it can be shown otherwise. --
201:
8:
385:. It is plainly not a neologism, there are
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
249:list of Music-related deletion discussions
246:
77:
7:
80:Articles for deletion/Dark psytrance
76:
24:
387:over a quarter of a million ghits
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
329:
1:
609:02:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
595:21:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
571:"Dj israelita no Populos Inn"
514:not something made up one day
505:17:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
484:13:44, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
453:00:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
427:18:22, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
378:07:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
366:Delete Non-notable neologism.
344:00:17, 17 November 2012 (UTC)
308:20:28, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
281:20:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
261:17:58, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
240:15:56, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
221:13:01, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
636:09:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
64:04:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
674:
579:Le petit bulletin Grenoble
563:"Alle påskens fester 2010"
646:Please do not modify it.
555:"Converting Digitarians"
32:Please do not modify it.
624:Psychedelic trance#Dark
521:than what we have here.
357:Psychedelic trance#Dark
52:Psychedelic trance#Dark
75:AfDs for this article:
408:, Vol 1, No 1 (2009)
389:for the term. This
362:Psychedelic trance
353:Merge and redirect
48:The result was
577:(Portuguese) and
575:Jornal da Madeira
559:"N.A.S.A project"
533:assume good faith
455:
346:
263:
219:
665:
648:
591:
586:
482:
474:
466:reliable sources
450:
445:
441:
423:
418:
340:
335:
331:
326:
322:
306:
298:
215:
214:
206:
205:
191:
143:
131:
113:
60:
34:
673:
672:
668:
667:
666:
664:
663:
662:
661:
655:deletion review
644:
589:
584:
567:"Trance Energy"
472:
469:
448:
434:
421:
416:
338:
333:
315:
296:
293:
212:
148:
139:
104:
88:
85:
73:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
671:
669:
660:
659:
639:
638:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
569:(Australian),
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
539:
525:
524:
523:
522:
518:Wiktionary:CFI
509:
508:
507:
458:
457:
456:
443:
442:
431:
430:
429:
411:
410:
409:
400:Botond Vitos,
395:
394:
380:
349:
348:
347:
324:
323:
312:
311:
310:
283:
265:
264:
243:
242:
209:
208:
145:
90:Dark psytrance
84:
83:
82:
74:
72:
70:Dark psytrance
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
670:
658:
656:
652:
647:
641:
640:
637:
633:
629:
625:
621:
618:
617:
610:
606:
602:
598:
597:
596:
593:
592:
587:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
540:
537:
536:
534:
529:
528:
527:
526:
519:
515:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
480:
476:
475:
467:
463:
460:
459:
454:
451:
444:
440:
438:
433:
432:
428:
425:
424:
419:
412:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
358:
354:
351:
350:
345:
342:
341:
336:
325:
321:
319:
314:
313:
309:
304:
300:
299:
291:
287:
284:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
245:
244:
241:
237:
233:
228:
227:Possible Keep
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
204:
200:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
154:
151:
150:Find sources:
146:
142:
138:
135:
129:
125:
121:
117:
112:
108:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
86:
81:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
61:
54:
53:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
645:
642:
619:
582:
578:
574:
470:
461:
435:
414:
405:
382:
365:
352:
328:
316:
294:
285:
273:Stuartyeates
268:
232:Steve Dufour
226:
210:
198:
192:
184:
177:
171:
165:
159:
149:
136:
56:
50:redirect to
49:
47:
31:
28:
391:book source
330:-- Cheers,
175:free images
565:(Danish),
557:(Danish),
213:neon white
651:talk page
561:(Dutch),
493:WP:FRINGE
364:article.
253:• Gene93k
37:talk page
653:or in a
620:Redirect
601:Odie5533
585:Spinning
542:morning.
497:Odie5533
449:Vacation
437:Relisted
417:Spinning
370:Odie5533
318:Relisted
290:WP:MUSIC
134:View log
39:or in a
473:SabreBD
462:Comment
339:Huntley
297:SabreBD
181:WP refs
169:scholar
107:protect
102:history
59:MBisanz
628:Michig
286:Delete
269:Delete
153:Google
111:delete
590:Spark
422:Spark
334:Riley
196:JSTOR
157:books
141:Stats
128:views
120:watch
116:links
16:<
632:talk
605:talk
501:talk
479:talk
383:Keep
374:talk
303:talk
277:talk
257:talk
236:talk
217:talk
189:FENS
163:news
124:logs
98:talk
94:edit
622:to
355:to
292:.--
203:TWL
132:– (
634:)
607:)
503:)
404:,
376:)
368:--
279:)
259:)
251:.
238:)
183:)
126:|
122:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
100:|
96:|
55:.
630:(
603:(
499:(
481:)
477:(
372:(
305:)
301:(
275:(
255:(
234:(
207:)
199:·
193:·
185:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
155:(
147:(
144:)
137:·
130:)
92:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.