312:
I pretty much disagree with your point of view. Sure, if an author is important one can be sure that something has been translated, but I would not base the existence of
English translations as a measure of notability. I voted delete on this one and I would have voted delete on it.wikipedia as well.
266:. Unverifiable. Possible vanity page. Google search on Dario Chioli / on co-author does not bring up info. The "same" article was posted yesterday in the Italian Knowledge (XXG) - and flagged to watch for self-promotion/needing verification.
278:
nn. Not having heard of this "Magnanelli edizioni" publisher (the main publisher for this author) before, I checked their web site, and found out that it's the kind of publisher that only publishes about 1 book every 2 months.
112:
unless they had a distribution of 5000. Anyone can publish a book: I don't know the distinction of the publishing house. Article is posed as a series of links to web sites. Article was written by
216:: How sure are we that the website linked as source for these books is not a self-publishing house? Amazon has nothing by this author. Italian Wikipedians, can you verify? -
247:
222:
116:(Dario Chioli's web site name coincidentally; user has only uploaded this unsourced image and written this article) and three minutes later by
77:
Seems to be vanity; probably non-notable
Italian author, although this is difficult to verify from an English-speaker's perspective. I have
17:
296:
vanity, at least from stanpoint of
English WP--no evidence that any thing he's written is or has been translated into English
242:
217:
353:
36:
252:
227:
318:
284:
352:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
78:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
314:
280:
120:, whose only contribs have been wrt this author. Seems to indicate vanity; notability is yet to be proven.
117:
338:
322:
300:
288:
270:
256:
231:
208:
177:
142:
126:
96:
65:
138:: Point taken, esp. re the publishing, but I think we've still got enough here to keep the article. -
113:
200:
71:
124:
241:, then, per ERcheck. I suspected this was a very minor publisher, and it looks as if it is. -
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
109:
82:
335:
186:
167:
185:
Enough published to warrant expansion. Writing in
Italian makes him less visible.
121:
62:
267:
139:
93:
157:
297:
49:
92:. Notability asserted and shown. He's got several published books. -
346:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
108:: Several books published does not necessarily qualify for
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
81:lone contributor for evidence of notability as in
356:). No further edits should be made to this page.
156:. Warning, image in article is unsourced. --
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
339:09:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
66:08:22, 12 November 2005 (UTC)
44:The result of the debate was
323:09:45, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
301:00:02, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
289:22:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
271:15:08, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
257:22:51, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
232:10:46, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
209:02:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
178:00:42, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
143:01:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
127:00:52, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
97:00:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
373:
349:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
243:Just zis Guy, you know?
218:Just zis Guy, you know?
364:
351:
315:Paolo Liberatore
281:Paolo Liberatore
206:
203:
198:
195:
192:
189:
173:
170:
163:
160:
59:
56:
53:
34:
372:
371:
367:
366:
365:
363:
362:
361:
360:
354:deletion review
347:
249:
224:
204:
201:
196:
193:
190:
187:
176:
171:
168:
161:
158:
154:Keep and expand
75:
57:
54:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
370:
368:
359:
358:
342:
341:
328:
327:
326:
325:
304:
303:
291:
273:
260:
259:
246:
235:
234:
221:
211:
180:
165:
150:
149:
148:
147:
146:
145:
130:
129:
118:151.37.243.202
114:User:Superzeko
100:
99:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
369:
357:
355:
350:
344:
343:
340:
337:
334:Vanity page.
333:
330:
329:
324:
320:
316:
311:
308:
307:
306:
305:
302:
299:
295:
292:
290:
286:
282:
277:
274:
272:
269:
265:
262:
261:
258:
255:
254:
248:
244:
240:
237:
236:
233:
230:
229:
223:
219:
215:
212:
210:
207:
199:
184:
181:
179:
174:
164:
155:
152:
151:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
128:
125:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
95:
91:
88:
87:
86:
84:
80:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
60:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
348:
345:
331:
309:
293:
275:
263:
251:
238:
226:
213:
182:
153:
135:
105:
89:
76:
72:Dario Chioli
46:NO CONSENSUS
45:
43:
31:
28:
336:Dottore So
122:jnothman
310:Comment
268:ERcheck
214:Comment
172:nicate!
136:Comment
106:Comment
332:Delete
294:Delete
276:Delete
264:Delete
239:Delete
140:Sensor
110:WP:BIO
94:Sensor
83:WP:BIO
169:Commu
79:asked
16:<
319:Talk
285:Talk
253:AfD?
228:AfD?
183:Keep
90:Keep
63:Talk
298:FRS
250:::
225:::
197:493
321:)
287:)
205:lk
202:Ta
194:ns
191:yo
188:Dl
162:LE
159:NS
85:.
61:|
50:—
48:.
317:(
283:(
245:/
220:/
175:)
166:(
58:P
55:I
52:J
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.