402:
per nominator. None of the three triangle centers named after him in ETC shows up as the subject of a significant level of other research in Google scholar, so I don't think he can claim to have a notable concept named after him. I did find one paper "Grinberg triangles" by Deko Dekov in the
415:
criteria approximate something you would expect to see from a full professor at a good research university rather than someone who is still a student), and while the
Olympiad gold is a significant accomplishment I don't think it is good enough by itself either.
528:. To add: WoS, GS, and plain Google are all unaware of the concepts of "Blaikie points" and "Blaikie transformations", so these are clearly not notable at the moment as the article would have us believe. WoS shows h-index of 0. Respectfully,
289:
winner, was not generally regarded as notable enough on the strength of the subject's competition record. (And the Putnam is considerably more prestigious than either the IMO or the
Bundeswettbewer.) Rather it was the
168:
350:
203:. This does not automatically confer notability on the subject: roughly the top 10% of participants receive golds, and anyway as a high-school competition it would hardly seem to rise to the level of
277:" seem to be very questionable grounds for keeping the article. As for the mathematics competitions, the bar for notability is (or was at one time) quite high: the policy under which this falls is
434:
407:
but it seems to be self-published (Dekov's own journal) and in any case that's still not a significant level of other research. This is not close to the scholarly prominence expected for
123:
162:
207:. The only other evidence of notability is some triangle centers named after the subject in the Encyclopedia of Triangle Centers. I believe, per a comment made by
490:
of the four given references, two are primary and one doesn't say anything about the person. That is not suitable for a BLP and it does not hint at notability.
243:; he has won two silver medals (2004, 2005) and one gold medal (2006) at the International Mathematical Olympiad; and additionally he was Bundessieger of the
314:
More than just being a Erdos coauthor, Rubin's paper with Erdos on "Choosability in graphs" is a highly cited paper in the field. This most likely satisfies
378:). MathSciNet shows only 4 publications by the subect, with no citations. Similarly scant citability data in GoogleScholar. According to his own website
128:
381:
he appears to be a graduate student. If he did introduce an important and broadly used new concept, he might qualify for satisfying
Criterion 1 of
451:
328:
200:
96:
91:
17:
100:
83:
286:
183:
301:
222:
150:
553:
36:
211:, that this can be used as a source for articles, but not as a source for establishing notability, much like the
295:
216:
144:
552:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
495:
421:
294:
1 of the subject, together with the outstanding Putnam record that ultimately tipped the scales in that case.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
537:
520:
499:
482:
457:
425:
394:
365:
334:
305:
256:
226:
140:
65:
87:
199:
Contested prod. The article was deprodded on the grounds that the subject won a gold medal in the 2006
190:
533:
374:. High school level awards do not confer academic notability, (see item 9 in 'Notes and Examples' in
61:
470:
433:. A gold medal at the Int'l Math Olympiad (is quite an achievement but) does not suffice, nor does
278:
204:
79:
71:
53:
491:
444:
417:
321:
252:
208:
176:
361:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
508:
466:
438:
412:
408:
382:
375:
315:
266:
49:
478:
156:
529:
390:
57:
516:
248:
52:, but the consensus is that, at present, he does not, nor is the IMO sufficent to pass
357:
291:
282:
117:
473:
to rule on IMO contestants is highly unorthodox, in spite of the name "olympiad".
474:
379:
386:
512:
507:
per above. But with no prejudice against recreation if he later passes
546:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:
351:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
275:
S-Blaikie transform of O as the
Blaikie point of O and OS
241:
S-Blaikie transform of O as the
Blaikie point of O and OS
271:
Blaikie point of O and g for the point Z of concurrence
237:
Blaikie point of O and g for the point Z of concurrence
113:
109:
105:
175:
189:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
556:). No further edits should be made to this page.
405:Journal of Computer-Generated Euclidean Geometry
385:, but that does not appear to be the case here.
265:Let me just say that the subject flat out fails
247:four times. The subject is notable in my eyes.
318:criterion #1, but even this is questionable.
8:
345:
281:. For some perspective, even the article
48:. This can be recreated if/when he meets
349:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
465:Not notable as an academic (fails
201:International Mathematics Olympiad
24:
411:(unsurprisingly, as most of the
287:Putnam Mathematics Competition
1:
437:(yet) provide him sufficient
235:Grinberg introduced the term
435:his work as a mathematician
245:Bundeswettbewerb Mathematik
573:
439:notability as an academic
269:. So "introduc the term
549:Please do not modify it.
538:15:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
521:22:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
500:08:41, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
483:03:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
458:00:49, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
426:00:11, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
395:23:35, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
366:23:12, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
335:00:58, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
306:21:37, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
257:21:17, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
227:19:29, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
66:01:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
209:User:David Eppstein
239:, and defined the
44:The result was
368:
354:
564:
551:
456:
355:
333:
298:
273:, and defin the
219:
194:
193:
179:
131:
121:
103:
34:
572:
571:
567:
566:
565:
563:
562:
561:
560:
554:deletion review
547:
454:
442:
331:
319:
296:
217:
136:
127:
94:
78:
75:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
570:
568:
559:
558:
542:
541:
523:
502:
492:Paul Carpenter
485:
460:
450:
445:Justin W Smith
428:
418:David Eppstein
397:
369:
342:
341:
340:
339:
338:
337:
327:
322:Justin W Smith
309:
308:
297:Sławomir Biały
260:
259:
218:Sławomir Biały
197:
196:
133:
129:AfD statistics
80:Darij Grinberg
74:
72:Darij Grinberg
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
569:
557:
555:
550:
544:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
524:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
489:
486:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
461:
459:
455:
453:
447:
446:
440:
436:
432:
429:
427:
423:
419:
414:
410:
406:
401:
398:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
377:
373:
370:
367:
363:
359:
352:
348:
344:
343:
336:
332:
330:
324:
323:
317:
313:
312:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
214:
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
548:
545:
525:
504:
487:
462:
448:
443:
430:
404:
399:
371:
346:
325:
320:
292:Erdos number
285:, four time
283:Arthur Rubin
274:
270:
244:
240:
236:
232:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
45:
43:
31:
28:
163:free images
530:Agricola44
471:WP:Athlete
469:). Use of
279:WP:ATHLETE
205:WP:ATHLETE
58:Courcelles
54:WP:ATHLETE
358:• Gene93k
249:Inniverse
124:View log
509:WP:PROF
467:WP:PROF
413:WP:PROF
409:WP:PROF
383:WP:PROF
376:WP:PROF
316:WP:PROF
267:WP:PROF
169:WP refs
157:scholar
97:protect
92:history
50:WP:PROF
526:Delete
505:Delete
488:Delete
475:Arcfrk
463:Delete
431:Delete
400:Delete
372:Delete
141:Google
101:delete
46:delete
452:stalk
387:Nsk92
329:stalk
184:JSTOR
145:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
534:talk
517:talk
513:Ozob
496:talk
479:talk
422:talk
391:talk
362:talk
347:Note
302:talk
253:talk
233:Keep
223:talk
213:OEIS
177:FENS
151:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
356:--
191:TWL
126:•
122:– (
536:)
519:)
511:.
498:)
481:)
441:.
424:)
393:)
364:)
353:.
304:)
255:)
225:)
215:.
171:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:.
540:.
532:(
515:(
494:(
477:(
449:/
420:(
416:—
389:(
360:(
326:/
300:(
251:(
221:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.