358:
specifics), a few lines in which the subject discusses herself (so not entirely reliable), and two passing mentions of her one significant TV role (which don't even give the name of her character). I'm not sure that the series itself is that notable either – I can find little information about it other than what's in the last two sources. As the subject fails all three points of
486:
requires that notability be demonstrated by multiple reliable independent secondary sources addressing the topic in detal. Those sources simply do not exist. I have examined the sources cited and found that three of the four merely mention the subject's name, giving absolutely no other information
357:
If she were truly "prominent" I think that there would be far more significant coverage online. The sources that are currently present in the article seem to be the best that the web has to offer, and they are, in order: a two-and-a-half-line description (which mentions modelling work but gives no
248:
as two sources I have added to article including Times of India confirm she has a prominent role in a primetime Indian tv series, also telegraph shows she is a very popular model, also won a Miss
Photogenic Award for models which seems of note as it received press coverage.
165:
343:
You make some very good points, but I still think the combination of being a prominent model with having a meaty role in a primetime series pushes her just over the notability hurdle.
118:
159:
440:
370:
works, no "unique, prolific or innovative contributions" and no large fan following – certainly not on the basis of what we have here), the article should be deleted.
509:
460:
307:
The article also relies on original research in at least two places – neither of the sources in the "Television" section states that the subject appeared in
125:
267:
The point about "multiple, significant" acting roles stands – the impression given is that the subject of the article is still very much
382:
323:
287:
224:
91:
86:
17:
95:
271:. And winning what appears to be a new (less than five years old), regional, college student beauty pageant (at least according to
78:
180:
311:, and the claim that she has appeared in "short films" (plural) is completely unsupported (source 2 gives one credit only).
147:
576:
413:
as still questionable for the needed notability improvements and there's nothing to suggest at least minimally better.
40:
468:
448:
205:
58:
141:
426:
359:
268:
391:
377:
332:
318:
296:
282:
272:
233:
219:
557:
541:
521:
500:
488:
472:
452:
431:
397:
352:
338:
302:
258:
239:
137:
60:
464:
444:
572:
348:
254:
53:
36:
187:
209:
414:
173:
82:
551:
as a badly sourced stub which NMODEL. Hasn't had any significant roles as an actor or as a model.
197:
372:
313:
277:
214:
537:
517:
496:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
571:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
552:
487:
about her, and the remaining source appears to be a short interview, which is unhelpful per
344:
250:
153:
483:
74:
66:
533:
513:
492:
112:
208:, picture sites, directories and social media. I think that this is a case of
204:, significant roles as an actress, and the only sources I can find are
565:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
532:- after several days at AfD, this stub is still poorly sourced.
108:
104:
100:
172:
186:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
579:). No further edits should be made to this page.
275:) is very weak grounds for keeping the article.
8:
508:Note: This debate has been included in the
459:Note: This debate has been included in the
441:list of Fashion-related deletion discussions
439:Note: This debate has been included in the
510:list of People-related deletion discussions
507:
461:list of India-related deletion discussions
458:
438:
491:. Googling turned up nothing useful.
489:Knowledge (XXG):Interviews#Notability
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
196:I don't believe that this passes
1:
596:
558:03:24, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
542:19:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
522:18:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
501:16:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
473:15:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
453:15:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
432:05:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
398:00:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
353:21:12, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
339:18:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
303:21:08, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
259:19:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
240:19:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
61:21:13, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
568:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
206:WP:TRIVIALMENTIONs
524:
475:
465:Shawn in Montreal
455:
445:Shawn in Montreal
396:
337:
301:
238:
587:
570:
555:
429:
424:
388:
385:
380:
375:
329:
326:
321:
316:
293:
290:
285:
280:
230:
227:
222:
217:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
55:Anthony Bradbury
34:
595:
594:
590:
589:
588:
586:
585:
584:
583:
577:deletion review
566:
553:
427:
415:
383:
378:
373:
324:
319:
314:
309:Byomkesh Bakshi
288:
283:
278:
225:
220:
215:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
593:
591:
582:
581:
561:
560:
545:
544:
526:
525:
504:
503:
477:
476:
456:
435:
434:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
360:WP:ENTERTAINER
305:
262:
261:
194:
193:
130:
75:Darshana Banik
69:
67:Darshana Banik
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
592:
580:
578:
574:
569:
563:
562:
559:
556:
550:
547:
546:
543:
539:
535:
531:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
506:
505:
502:
498:
494:
490:
485:
482:
479:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
457:
454:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
433:
430:
425:
422:
418:
412:
409:
408:
399:
394:
393:
387:
386:
381:
376:
369:
365:
361:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
335:
334:
328:
327:
322:
317:
310:
306:
304:
299:
298:
292:
291:
286:
281:
274:
270:
269:up-and-coming
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
256:
252:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
236:
235:
229:
228:
223:
218:
211:
207:
203:
199:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
567:
564:
548:
529:
480:
420:
416:
410:
390:
371:
367:
363:
331:
312:
308:
295:
276:
245:
232:
213:
201:
200:/NACTOR. No
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
554:Omni Flames
345:Atlantic306
251:Atlantic306
160:free images
210:WP:TOOSOON
573:talk page
514:• Gene93k
366:roles in
198:WP:NMODEL
37:talk page
575:or in a
364:multiple
202:multiple
119:View log
39:or in a
534:Bearian
493:Msnicki
481:Delete.
368:notable
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
549:Delete
530:Delete
484:WP:GNG
423:wister
419:wister
411:Delete
138:Google
96:delete
50:Delete
379:Mario
374:Super
320:Mario
315:Super
284:Mario
279:Super
221:Mario
216:Super
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
538:talk
518:talk
497:talk
469:talk
449:talk
428:talk
392:Talk
362:(no
349:talk
333:Talk
297:Talk
273:this
255:talk
246:Keep
234:Talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
384:Man
325:Man
289:Man
226:Man
188:TWL
117:– (
540:)
520:)
512:.
499:)
471:)
463:.
451:)
443:.
389:(
351:)
330:(
294:(
257:)
231:(
212:.
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:--
536:(
516:(
495:(
467:(
447:(
421:T
417:S
395:)
347:(
336:)
300:)
253:(
237:)
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.