252:? I believe it meets the standards of notability. Specifically it "has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" the existing Tom's hardware link, and the two new links added show that it meets the standard of notability. I don't think it's too technical. I saw it was a feature of some hard drives I was considering buying, so I wanted to know more. I don't build hard drives, but I can install them. But I think that that is who cares about DevSlp. "feel"ing that it fails NotFaq? I think the nominator would have to be more clear, because I don't see anything in the article that meets any of the notfaq criteria.
272:. I think it's too early to tell if it will be notable. Yes, it exists, has been published, and has claims, but I don't know if it will get widely adopted. Right now, we mostly have just marketing claims. Current HDDs and SSDs have power-management features already. I really doubt that this product will do anything like what is claimed unless you first specifically "de-tune" the drive's existing power-management, or otherwise fudge the numbers. But I could certainly be wrong. My recommendation: let's
280:
of demonstrated effects and adoption in real life, not just claims of what it "can" do. Actually, I'm okay for leaving the article as is while we wait, but not with linking it to current pages; but since we don't like pages that aren't linked, that amounts to delete for now.
300:
FWIW, to me DevSleep seems notable enough to have an article of its own – at least, it became part of an official standard. Though, article should be slightly expanded to provide a little better context, so it's clear that DevSleep is part of the SATA revision 3.2 etc.
170:
123:
222:
164:
201:
This article is a bit technical and not sure if it is notable enough for its own page. Feel it fails WP:NOTFAQ. Perhaps redirect to
130:
17:
333:
310:
53:
185:
152:
96:
91:
415:
329:
100:
40:
286:
257:
83:
411:
146:
36:
371:
282:
253:
178:
142:
392:
396:
378:
337:
314:
290:
261:
234:
214:
65:
230:
210:
192:
61:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
410:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
347:
306:
249:
358:
388:
158:
325:
277:
226:
206:
57:
117:
302:
87:
202:
350:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
248:
There seems to be three complaints. Too technical? Not notable enough?
79:
71:
404:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113:
109:
105:
177:
357:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
203:
Serial ATA#SATA revision 3.2 - 16 Gbit/s - 1969 MB/s
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
418:). No further edits should be made to this page.
223:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
191:
8:
276:and see if it becomes significant, based on
221:Note: This debate has been included in the
220:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
397:09:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
66:09:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
379:03:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
338:19:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
315:13:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
291:16:03, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
262:12:42, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
235:19:36, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
215:12:40, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
435:
328:to establish notability.
407:Please do not modify it.
324:—Sufficient coverage in
32:Please do not modify it.
387:Keep. Satisfies GNG.
330:Lesser Cartographies
48:The result was
381:
237:
54:non-admin closure
426:
409:
376:
368:
363:
356:
352:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
434:
433:
429:
428:
427:
425:
424:
423:
422:
416:deletion review
405:
372:
364:
359:
345:
246:Article creator
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
432:
430:
421:
420:
400:
399:
384:
383:
382:
354:
353:
342:
341:
340:
318:
317:
294:
293:
283:A D Monroe III
265:
264:
239:
238:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
431:
419:
417:
413:
408:
402:
401:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
380:
377:
375:
369:
367:
362:
355:
351:
349:
344:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
319:
316:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
295:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
251:
247:
244:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
219:
218:
217:
216:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
406:
403:
373:
365:
360:
346:
321:
297:
273:
269:
245:
242:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
412:talk page
250:WP:NOTFAQ
227:• Gene93k
37:talk page
414:or in a
389:James500
348:Relisted
311:contribs
124:View log
39:or in a
207:Gbawden
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
58:Natg 19
374:(talk)
303:Dsimic
270:Delete
143:Google
101:delete
80:DevSlp
72:DevSlp
361:Davey
326:WP:RS
298:Keep:
278:WP:RS
268:Weak
254:McKay
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
393:talk
366:2010
334:talk
322:Keep
307:talk
287:talk
274:wait
258:talk
243:Keep
231:talk
211:talk
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
62:talk
50:keep
193:TWL
122:– (
52:. (
395:)
370:•
336:)
313:)
309:|
301:—
289:)
281:--
260:)
233:)
225:.
213:)
205:?
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
56:)
391:(
332:(
305:(
285:(
256:(
229:(
209:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.