Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/DeSoL - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

376:
on a major chart, coupled with significant source coverage. Hot AC is indeed a notable chart. Not sure where the AAA charts came from, but sure as heck not Billboard. Oh yeah, and having the highest AC debut in the history of that chart, isn't that a good assertation?
373: 217: 127:
It may well be true that this band is well-known in some circles, but there is no evidence of notability in the article - which has been created and added to by a suspiciously large number of one-off users
169: 194:
Claim of billboard charting does not show up for me at billboard. What are Triple A charts? Two of their album articles claim allmusic professional reviews that do not exist. Allmusic
120: 243: 17: 250: 399: 239: 233: 230: 221: 36: 147: 236:
articles from Billboard that discuss the band itself a bit more...although they seem like they might overlap a bit.
181: 155: 87: 82: 398:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
91: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
204: 318: 74: 195: 290: 177: 151: 378: 247: 200: 384: 364: 344: 320: 294: 277: 256: 208: 198: 185: 159: 137: 56: 311: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
360: 253: 286: 273: 133: 338: 50: 108: 356: 355:
per Onorem. Coverage by Washington Post and New York Times makes them notable.
78: 331:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
304:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
227:
Does the Adult Contemporary Billboard chart count as a national music chart?
269: 129: 70: 62: 392:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
268:- I just checked the interwiki links and they are fake. 170:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
115: 104: 100: 96: 222:
commenting on it being the highest debut in AC history
309:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
336:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 402:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 164: 146:there seem to be a few news hits for them 168:: This debate has been included in the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 285:: trivial coverage, non-notable. 1: 419: 385:01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 365:00:24, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 345:00:04, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 321:00:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 295:08:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC) 278:12:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 257:11:50, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 218:Billboard AC Chart Listing 209:04:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC) 186:15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 160:15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 138:12:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC) 57:08:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC) 220:and a blurb on Billboard 395:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 374:have a charted single 383:and his otters • 316: 44:The result was 347: 323: 310: 197:and short review 188: 173: 410: 397: 381: 380:Ten Pound Hammer 341: 335: 333: 314: 308: 306: 174: 118: 112: 94: 53: 34: 418: 417: 413: 412: 411: 409: 408: 407: 406: 400:deletion review 393: 379: 339: 329: 312: 302: 240:Washington Post 178:LinguistAtLarge 152:LinguistAtLarge 114: 85: 69: 66: 51: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 416: 414: 405: 404: 388: 387: 367: 349: 348: 334: 326: 325: 324: 307: 299: 298: 297: 280: 262: 261: 260: 259: 244:New York Times 242:article & 237: 228: 225: 212: 211: 189: 162: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 415: 403: 401: 396: 390: 389: 386: 382: 375: 371: 368: 366: 362: 358: 354: 351: 350: 346: 343: 342: 332: 328: 327: 322: 319: 315: 305: 301: 300: 296: 292: 288: 284: 281: 279: 275: 271: 267: 264: 263: 258: 255: 252: 249: 245: 241: 238: 235: 232: 229: 226: 223: 219: 216: 215: 214: 213: 210: 206: 202: 201:Duffbeerforme 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 183: 179: 171: 167: 163: 161: 158: 157: 153: 148: 145: 142: 141: 140: 139: 135: 131: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 394: 391: 369: 352: 337: 330: 313:Juliancolton 303: 282: 265: 191: 176: 165: 150: 143: 126: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 246:article. -- 287:JamesBurns 372:as they 234:two more 121:View log 340:MBisanz 266:Comment 192:Comment 144:Comment 88:protect 83:history 52:MBisanz 357:Ancemy 283:Delete 248:Onorem 231:Here's 116:delete 92:delete 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 71:DeSoL 63:DeSoL 16:< 370:Keep 361:talk 353:Keep 291:talk 274:talk 205:talk 182:Talk 175:-- — 166:Note 156:Talk 134:talk 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 46:keep 270:Deb 254:Dil 149:. — 130:Deb 363:) 317:| 293:) 276:) 207:) 180:• 172:. 154:• 136:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 48:. 359:( 289:( 272:( 251:♠ 224:. 203:( 132:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
MBisanz
08:31, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
DeSoL
DeSoL
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Deb
talk
12:50, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

LinguistAtLarge
Talk
15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
LinguistAtLarge
Talk
15:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.