383:- A quick Google search indicates this is an emerging subgenre of underground metal, distinct from doom metal. It's a neologism, but it strikes me as prevalent enough to be notable. I'm sure stringent adherents of notability guidelines will differ with me on that. Keeping for future improvement seems to make sense to me.
405:.) (2) If more can be said about the genre, what prevents it from being handled as part of the parent article? We're not talking about whether the genre gets a mention here, but rather whether it is sufficiently notable to merit a standalone article rather than being treated as part of
176:
401:(1)How can it be an "emerging" genre when almost every example the article lists was formed in the 1990s? (The label "emerging" is troubling too, being a listed dogwhistle for
137:
170:
257:
212:
21:
17:
215:, and this article appears to be in exactly the same boat. The article says little more than does the section whence it's split in
423:
237:
110:
105:
219:, and nothing that couldn't be handled just as well in the parent article section. I suggest a D&R just as we did with
191:
114:
158:
447:
40:
97:
446:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
298:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
292:
152:
148:
325:
432:
392:
371:
329:
302:
272:
246:
79:
419:
233:
198:
294:
184:
340:
312:
290:
402:
388:
268:
33:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
53:
321:
289:. The article could use more citations on its notability, but it could easily be built upon.
427:
241:
415:
229:
164:
101:
384:
264:
220:
131:
350:
286:
58:
406:
282:
216:
208:
93:
85:
343:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
315:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
440:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
281:
The article is about a subgenre notably separate from both
207:
We recently deleted/redirected one article forked from
127:
123:
119:
183:
348:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
320:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
197:
213:Knowledge (XXG):Articles_for_deletion/Funeral_doom
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
450:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
258:list of Music-related deletion discussions
252:
256:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
28:
1:
467:
433:12:50, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
393:22:23, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
372:20:44, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
80:21:35, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
330:01:20, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
303:03:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
273:01:59, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
247:15:02, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
443:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
48:The result was
431:
374:
332:
275:
261:
245:
54:non-admin closure
458:
445:
413:
412:
370:
368:
365:
362:
359:
356:
353:
347:
345:
319:
317:
262:
227:
226:
202:
201:
187:
135:
117:
78:
76:
73:
70:
67:
64:
61:
38:
466:
465:
461:
460:
459:
457:
456:
455:
454:
448:deletion review
441:
410:
366:
363:
360:
357:
354:
351:
349:
338:
310:
224:
144:
108:
92:
89:
74:
71:
68:
65:
62:
59:
57:
41:deletion review
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
464:
462:
453:
452:
437:
436:
435:
396:
395:
376:
375:
346:
335:
334:
333:
318:
307:
306:
305:
295:Lebowbowbowski
276:
205:
204:
141:
88:
83:
46:
45:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
463:
451:
449:
444:
438:
434:
429:
425:
421:
417:
408:
404:
400:
399:
398:
397:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
377:
373:
369:
344:
342:
337:
336:
331:
327:
323:
316:
314:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
288:
284:
280:
277:
274:
270:
266:
259:
255:
251:
250:
249:
248:
243:
239:
235:
231:
222:
218:
214:
210:
200:
196:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:Find sources:
142:
139:
133:
129:
125:
121:
116:
112:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
90:
87:
84:
82:
81:
77:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
31:
30:
23:
19:
442:
439:
411:- Simon Dodd
380:
339:
311:
278:
253:
225:- Simon Dodd
221:Funeral doom
206:
194:
188:
180:
173:
167:
161:
155:
145:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
35:
32:
322:Ron Ritzman
287:death metal
171:free images
407:Doom metal
283:doom metal
217:Doom metal
209:Doom metal
94:Death/doom
86:Death/doom
381:Weak Keep
265:• Gene93k
403:WP:BALLS
341:Relisted
313:Relisted
138:View log
20: |
385:Carrite
177:WP refs
165:scholar
111:protect
106:history
428:WP:LAW
242:WP:LAW
211:, see
149:Google
115:delete
192:JSTOR
153:books
132:views
124:watch
120:links
22:Death
16:<
389:talk
326:talk
299:talk
285:and
279:Keep
269:talk
254:Note
185:FENS
159:news
128:logs
102:talk
98:edit
263:--
199:TWL
136:– (
52:. (
414:{
391:)
379:-
328:)
301:)
271:)
260:.
228:{
223:.
179:)
130:|
126:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
104:|
100:|
56:)
430:}
426:·
424:C
422:·
420:T
418:·
416:U
409:.
387:(
367:3
364:8
361:F
358:J
355:T
352:C
324:(
297:(
267:(
244:}
240:·
238:C
236:·
234:T
232:·
230:U
203:)
195:·
189:·
181:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
151:(
143:(
140:)
134:)
96:(
75:3
72:8
69:F
66:J
63:T
60:C
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.