Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Debbie Schlussel - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

158:
is frequently greatly enhanced by knowing something about the actors involved. It is a very common, and very helpful, aspect of Knowledge (XXG) to not only know what happened but also who it was who had a hand in it. Furthermore, just as a stand alone proposition, people often want to know "WHO IS X, anyway?" if they hear a name. Indeed, explanation of persons is a common feature of a true paper encyclopedia. Therefore, I do not see how it can be appropriate to remove any information about anyone on the public scene. I see far less important and more trivial entries on Knowledge (XXG). Unless space is an issue, in which case you should try a few SMALL VERY FEW ads to cover costs, I cannot see any justification for limiting people's knowledge of who is who and what they are doing on the national or even sub-national stage.
157:
I think it is a significant weakness in this process that we are not advised of the basis or category under which deletion is being considered, in order to better evaluate and respond. However, I think that throughout Knowledge (XXG) discussion of events and organizations and activiteis of interest
132: 179:
as primary author of current rewrite, highly noteworthy. I'll note that one of the reasons this article exists is because Jimbo requested a rewrite
17: 141: 87:. Ms. Schlussel is quite a well-known pundit, I know her from her many appearances on the Bill Maher and Howard Stern shows. - 209: 36: 208:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
192: 171: 146: 124: 91: 78: 62: 116: 57: 154: 168: 103: 51: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
68: 88: 54: 136: 189: 75: 202:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
188:- no question this should stay, suprised its even under debate 135:
hits on google, and the article is actually pretty par.
180: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 212:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 99:. She is famous, unfortunately. 24: 1: 193:01:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 172:03:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC) 147:21:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 125:18:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 92:16:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 79:15:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC) 63:10:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC) 230: 205:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 167:Yup, she's famous. -- 216: 196: 160: 145: 221: 207: 198: 162: 159: 139: 120: 113: 108: 102: 69:Debbie Schlussel 61: 34: 229: 228: 224: 223: 222: 220: 219: 218: 217: 210:deletion review 203: 123: 118: 109: 104: 100: 74:Not noteworthy 72: 49: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 227: 225: 215: 214: 197: 195: 183: 174: 161: 149: 127: 115: 94: 71: 66: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 226: 213: 211: 206: 200: 199: 194: 191: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 173: 170: 169:Marriedtofilm 166: 163: 156: 153: 150: 148: 143: 138: 134: 131: 128: 126: 122: 121: 114: 112: 107: 98: 95: 93: 90: 86: 83: 82: 81: 80: 77: 70: 67: 65: 64: 60: 59: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 204: 201: 185: 176: 164: 151: 129: 117: 110: 105: 96: 84: 73: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 186:Speedy Keep 177:Strong keep 165:Speedy Keep 155:JonMoseley 142:p-review! 89:Mcasey666 137:JoeSmack 111:spinster 152:Keep — 133:478,000 130:Keep — 190:4.18GB 76:Pozole 58:Bryant 52:Daniel 106:disco 16:< 119:talk 97:Keep 85:Keep 46:keep 101:... 48:. 182:. 144:) 140:( 55:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Daniel
.
Bryant
10:05, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
Debbie Schlussel
Pozole
15:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Mcasey666
16:37, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
discospinster
talk
18:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
478,000
JoeSmack
p-review!
21:18, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
JonMoseley
Marriedtofilm
03:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

4.18GB
01:25, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
deletion review

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.