298:
Leadership
Conclave 2015" "several peer-reviewed national and international publications to his credit. " (highest citation figure is actually 51, from review journals; highest research paper is 31, which in inconsequential in this subject area) No major awards; no editorships; no faculty appointments. "He is a columnist for the Times of India, Hindustan Times, and DNA – Daily News and Analysis, " -- and so are all plastic surgeons who are looking for patients. This field has been a quagmire of advertisements, both on and off Knowledge (XXG). WE have removed about half the WP examples. Most still in WP have presidencies of major societies of editor in chief of major journal of major international prizes or distinguished professorships in major research universities. Those are the only safe criteria. (There are also a few who specialize in major celebrities--whether that should be a special case seems dubious to me, but some have had keeps.) The references are advertorials at best. The previous two AfDs were non-consensus, not keeps & thus no precedent.
297:
a few quotes will illustrate :"Dr. Shome who is regarded as one of the best plastic surgeons in Mumbai & India" ; "Shome, the facial plastic surgeon was conferred with prestigious "India’s Most
Promising Face in Facial Plastic Surgery Innovations” at Satya Brahma founded Indian Affairs India
448:
Dr. Debraj Shome is a much recognised, much awarded and very highly renowned Indian plastic surgeon. If he does not deserve a Wiki mention, then Wiki should not have any surgeons at all! If the article is poorly written, get it re written!
194:
238:) thinks this is spam. But an article that has survived nine years since its creation and five years since its last AfD discussion deserves better than speedy deletion. I have no feeling on the matter. —
92:
87:
364:
First page, all ediions mentions, in India's largest newspaper are worth nothing? 5) Adjunct
Faculty at Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai, India, for a surgeon, is worth nothing?!
401:
well,publishing multiple research papers with very high citation counts will do it, or being editor of a major journal, or distinguished full professor at a major university.
147:
318:
188:
361:
275:
82:
154:
427:
presents a detailed and persuasive case. Shome is not notable enough, and the article is far too heavy on advertising. Plus, at least some of those are
350:
341:
I am just an onlooker and a follower and I do not even necessarily know how to make edits to
Knowledge (XXG). But, I have a couple of comments here:
347:
365:
356:
2) Are awards by the Royal
College of Surgeons Glasgow and the highest Ophthalmological Society in India "no major awards"? 3) Here is another:
357:
17:
456:
387:
362:
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?Ref=VE9JQkcvMjAxMC8wOS8xOSNBcjAwMTA1&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom
376:
8) Can you then specify what actually is worth something? Sitting and editing articles and putting them up for deletion on Wiki?
120:
115:
479:
440:
412:
395:
330:
309:
286:
267:
124:
65:
353:
263:
249:
209:
107:
176:
498:
346:
1) US patents for inventions in India are rare for individual researchers. Does DGG mean to say they are not of value?
40:
326:
351:
http://medicaldialogues.in/bravo-apollo-spectra-doctor-invents-injection-for-natural-hair-re-growth-bags-us-patent/
235:
475:
348:
http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Health/2017-07-11/Indian-doctors-get-US-patent-for-hair-regrowth/311514
366:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/IIT-B-docs-use-nanotech-to-treat-cancer/articleshow/5570967.cms
170:
59:
460:
452:
391:
383:
358:
http://network7mediagroup.net/dr-debraj-shome-dr-rinky-kapoor-awarded-at-pharma-leaders-power-brand-awards/
322:
471:
166:
494:
36:
111:
216:
202:
103:
71:
373:
257:
243:
53:
436:
369:
280:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
493:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
354:
http://www.deccanchronicle.com/science/science/110717/two-win-patent-for-hair-regrowth.html
182:
408:
305:
253:
239:
229:
432:
428:
141:
424:
403:
300:
225:
487:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
374:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Debraj_Shome/publications
370:
http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2185464
137:
133:
129:
201:
215:
93:
Articles for deletion/Debraj Shome (3rd nomination)
88:
Articles for deletion/Debraj Shome (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
501:). No further edits should be made to this page.
368:6) 51 seminal publications are worth nothing?
431:, so one has to be sceptical about the rest.
319:list of Medicine-related deletion discussions
8:
317:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
360:Who decides btw what are major awards? 4)
450:
381:
316:
276:list of India-related deletion discussions
273:
80:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
78:
83:Articles for deletion/Debraj Shome
24:
470:non-notable person and per DGG.
252:) 21:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC) —
1:
66:02:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)
518:
480:15:00, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
441:11:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
413:02:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)
396:08:16, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
331:00:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
310:22:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
287:22:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
268:21:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)
490:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:AfDs for this article:
464:
455:comment added by
398:
386:comment added by
333:
323:Shawn in Montreal
289:
509:
492:
285:
220:
219:
205:
157:
145:
127:
62:
56:
34:
517:
516:
512:
511:
510:
508:
507:
506:
505:
499:deletion review
488:
378:
279:
162:
153:
118:
102:
99:
97:
75:
60:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
515:
513:
504:
503:
483:
482:
472:Sportsfan 1234
465:
443:
418:
417:
416:
415:
344:
343:
342:
335:
334:
313:
312:
291:
290:
223:
222:
159:
98:
96:
95:
90:
85:
79:
76:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
514:
502:
500:
496:
491:
485:
484:
481:
477:
473:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
447:
444:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:vanity awards
426:
423:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
405:
400:
399:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
379:
377:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
352:
349:
340:
337:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
315:
314:
311:
307:
303:
302:
296:
293:
292:
288:
284:
283:
277:
272:
271:
270:
269:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
248:
245:
241:
237:
234:
231:
227:
218:
214:
211:
208:
204:
200:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
164:Find sources:
160:
156:
152:
149:
143:
139:
135:
131:
126:
122:
117:
113:
109:
105:
101:
100:
94:
91:
89:
86:
84:
81:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
63:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
489:
486:
467:
451:— Preceding
445:
421:
402:
382:— Preceding
345:
338:
299:
294:
282:CAPTAIN RAJU
281:
260:
246:
232:
224:
212:
206:
198:
191:
185:
179:
173:
163:
150:
104:Debraj Shome
72:Debraj Shome
58:
49:
47:
31:
28:
457:116.73.8.71
388:27.4.28.255
189:free images
495:talk page
37:talk page
497:or in a
453:unsigned
384:unsigned
264:contribs
254:RHaworth
250:contribs
240:RHaworth
236:contribs
148:View log
55:Spaceman
39:or in a
433:Edwardx
295:Delete.
195:WPÂ refs
183:scholar
121:protect
116:history
468:Delete
422:Delete
167:Google
125:delete
50:delete
409:talk
306:talk
210:JSTOR
171:books
155:Stats
142:views
134:watch
130:links
61:Spiff
16:<
476:talk
461:talk
446:Keep
437:talk
392:talk
339:Keep
327:talk
258:talk
244:talk
230:talk
203:FENS
177:news
138:logs
112:talk
108:edit
52:. —
425:DGG
404:DGG
372:7)
301:DGG
226:DGG
217:TWL
146:– (
478:)
463:)
439:)
411:)
394:)
329:)
321:.
308:)
278:.
266:)
197:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
474:(
459:(
435:(
407:(
390:(
325:(
304:(
261:·
256:(
247:·
242:(
233:·
228:(
221:)
213:·
207:·
199:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
174:·
169:(
161:(
158:)
151:·
144:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.