237:
which runs on billions of devices today. It should be mentioned probably in those aritcles too, much of the computer networking history on
Knowledge starts in the 1990s and ignores the previous 30 years. But probably does not need one of its own, especially one that does not give historic context. I
228:
The OCR errors are because it was written in 1969, before the days anyone thought of putting documents on a computer (they were way too expensive back then).That makes it quite historical; way ahead of its time like much else in the
Englebart SRI lab which developed early Arpanet applications. But it
184:
While many of the 6000 RFCs are notable (and indeed used as the basis of systems like wikipedia), I can find no evidence that this particular RFC is notable. The name isn't conducive to googling, so I'd encourage other's to have a crack too. The fact that the internet version of the RFC appears to
153:
147:
114:
202:
229:
is already mentioned in
Rulifson's article. RFC 2555 does mention it on its 30th anniversary. In some ways it had a similar function to the original purpose of the
87:
82:
91:
74:
168:
135:
17:
129:
247:
216:
194:
56:
125:
266:
234:
78:
40:
175:
70:
62:
190:
262:
36:
141:
243:
161:
53:
212:
186:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
261:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
239:
208:
108:
185:
contain OCR errors that appear to have gone unnoticed is also telling.
255:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
230:
104:
100:
96:
160:
238:do not think it was ever implemented, for example.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
269:). No further edits should be made to this page.
203:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
174:
8:
201:Note: This debate has been included in the
200:
7:
24:
233:window system, ActiveX, and the
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
248:18:25, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
217:13:14, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
195:02:18, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
57:17:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
286:
235:Java programming language
258:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
71:Decode-Encode Language
63:Decode-Encode Language
48:The result was
219:
206:
277:
260:
207:
179:
178:
164:
112:
94:
34:
285:
284:
280:
279:
278:
276:
275:
274:
273:
267:deletion review
256:
121:
85:
69:
66:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
283:
281:
272:
271:
251:
250:
221:
220:
182:
181:
118:
65:
60:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
282:
270:
268:
264:
259:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
236:
232:
227:
223:
222:
218:
214:
210:
204:
199:
198:
197:
196:
192:
188:
177:
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
131:
127:
124:
123:Find sources:
119:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
257:
254:
225:
187:Stuartyeates
183:
171:
165:
157:
150:
144:
138:
132:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
148:free images
263:talk page
240:W Nowicki
209:• Gene93k
37:talk page
265:or in a
115:View log
54:MuZemike
39:or in a
154:WP refs
142:scholar
88:protect
83:history
226:Delete
126:Google
92:delete
50:delete
224:Weak
169:JSTOR
130:books
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
244:talk
231:NeWS
213:talk
191:talk
162:FENS
136:news
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
176:TWL
113:– (
52:. –
246:)
215:)
205:.
193:)
156:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
242:(
211:(
189:(
180:)
172:·
166:·
158:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
133:·
128:(
120:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.