Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Decoupling modification - Knowledge

Source 📝

459:) be accompanied by the creation of content at the target page. That is often, though not always, the case. Often elementary schools for example are redirected to target articles that until then have no content on the school in question -- not even a name. The benefit of doing it this way over a merge is that there is no need for the person suggesting a redirect to ensure that the history of the old, unreferenced text is moved over. A simple creation of new text (properly sourced) is all that is needed.-- 285:
I don't see substantial RS coverage of this term -- which at best is only a dic def anyway -- in gnews and gbooks. Nor is it reflected in the article. Nor does DGG point to anyway. In the absence of meeting GNG, and since this is a dic def, I don't see the basis for this !vote in WP
264:
and clarify. Based on the tax form used as an example, the term has a somewhat broader use than just for depreciation schedules, but for various other state modifications of their income tax rules to provide for differences from the corresponding of federal income tax rules.
404:
I could see a redirect. But I don't think this is appropriate material for a merge. It is all challenged text that lacks inline citations. Once redirected, of course any appropriate referenced material could be created at the article to which it is
169: 217: 163: 130: 239: 103: 98: 107: 200:
Lacks substantial RS coverage. In fact, most of the coverage in gbooks does not even relate to this tax concept. Tagged for notability for 2 years.
90: 425:"Many states follow the federal depreciation rules. However, a number of states do not accept some or all of the accelerated depreciation rules." 66: 384: 184: 151: 17: 364: 323: 145: 433: 94: 468: 450: 414: 395: 371: 328: 295: 276: 253: 231: 209: 72: 419:
The current text is not clear enough and needs to be rewritten; finding usable references is less of a problem (e.g.
141: 491: 40: 191: 61: 428: 86: 78: 487: 36: 431:
or form 500DM itself for the Maryland term "decoupling modification" – and for an in-depth treatment,
464: 410: 291: 205: 157: 352: 177: 56: 53: 391:). As far as I see this sense of the term "decoupling modification" is exclusive to Maryland.  -- 358: 321: 447: 392: 249: 227: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
486:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
388: 340: 307: 420: 460: 406: 287: 201: 318: 272: 245: 223: 124: 446:
rule that the user should readily see why they were sent to the target page.  --
443: 343:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
310:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
267: 424: 480:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
421:"Q. Do all states follow the federal depreciation rules? A. No." 218:
list of United States of America-related deletion discussions
385:
Corporate tax in the United States#Earnings and profits
120: 116: 112: 176: 455:
A redirect can (and, per your comment, it would seem
350:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 317:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 494:). No further edits should be made to this page. 240:list of Business-related deletion discussions 190: 8: 238:Note: This debate has been included in the 216:Note: This debate has been included in the 237: 215: 389:State income tax#Corporate income tax 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 469:22:38, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 451:22:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 415:17:30, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 396:11:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 372:01:05, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 329:20:03, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 296:06:02, 30 January 2012 (UTC) 277:05:16, 23 January 2012 (UTC) 254:00:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 232:00:37, 17 January 2012 (UTC) 210:23:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 73:22:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC) 511: 483:Please do not modify it. 442:a redirect violates the 32:Please do not modify it. 87:Decoupling modification 79:Decoupling modification 48:The result was 374: 331: 256: 243: 234: 221: 502: 485: 437: 370: 367: 361: 355: 349: 345: 316: 312: 244: 222: 195: 194: 180: 128: 110: 69: 64: 59: 34: 510: 509: 505: 504: 503: 501: 500: 499: 498: 492:deletion review 481: 432: 365: 359: 353: 351: 338: 326: 325:about my edits? 319:Armbrust, B.Ed. 305: 137: 101: 85: 82: 67: 62: 57: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 508: 506: 497: 496: 477: 476: 475: 474: 473: 472: 471: 399: 398: 377: 376: 375: 347: 346: 335: 334: 333: 332: 324: 314: 313: 302: 301: 300: 299: 298: 280: 279: 258: 257: 235: 198: 197: 134: 81: 76: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 507: 495: 493: 489: 484: 478: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 453: 452: 449: 445: 441: 435: 430: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 412: 408: 405:redirected.-- 403: 402: 401: 400: 397: 394: 390: 386: 382: 379: 378: 373: 368: 362: 356: 348: 344: 342: 337: 336: 330: 327: 322: 320: 315: 311: 309: 304: 303: 297: 293: 289: 284: 283: 282: 281: 278: 274: 270: 269: 263: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 241: 236: 233: 229: 225: 219: 214: 213: 212: 211: 207: 203: 193: 189: 186: 183: 179: 175: 171: 168: 165: 162: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 143: 140: 139:Find sources: 135: 132: 126: 122: 118: 114: 109: 105: 100: 96: 92: 88: 84: 83: 80: 77: 75: 74: 70: 65: 60: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 482: 479: 456: 439: 434:"this paper" 387:(or perhaps 380: 339: 306: 266: 261: 199: 187: 181: 173: 166: 160: 154: 148: 138: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 164:free images 461:Epeefleche 407:Epeefleche 288:Epeefleche 202:Epeefleche 488:talk page 429:this page 286:policy.-- 246:• Gene93k 224:• Gene93k 37:talk page 490:or in a 444:WP:R#PLA 366:contribs 341:Relisted 308:Relisted 131:View log 39:or in a 448:Lambiam 393:Lambiam 170:WP refs 158:scholar 104:protect 99:history 54:King of 457:should 427:, and 142:Google 108:delete 381:Merge 354:Bryce 273:talk 185:JSTOR 146:books 125:views 117:watch 113:links 16:< 465:talk 440:Only 411:talk 360:talk 292:talk 262:Keep 250:talk 228:talk 206:talk 178:FENS 152:news 121:logs 95:talk 91:edit 438:). 383:to 268:DGG 192:TWL 129:– ( 467:) 423:, 413:) 363:| 294:) 275:) 252:) 242:. 230:) 220:. 208:) 172:) 123:| 119:| 115:| 111:| 106:| 102:| 97:| 93:| 71:♠ 52:. 463:( 436:. 409:( 369:) 357:( 290:( 271:( 248:( 226:( 204:( 196:) 188:· 182:· 174:· 167:· 161:· 155:· 149:· 144:( 136:( 133:) 127:) 89:( 68:♣ 63:♦ 58:♥

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
King of



22:04, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Decoupling modification
Decoupling modification
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Epeefleche

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.