Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Denis William Cashmore - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

137:
with the various details of Dennis' life all non-notable, the only possible reason for a keep is the claim that he helped design Watford's Family Enclosure. I checked Oliver Phillips' official history, and the chapter on 1982-87 contains a single mention of a "new family enclosure in 1982." Still, whether Dennis designed it or not, that's not really a justification for keeping the article.
278: 257:
I have been advised that Ian has spoken with his Dad who says he has many of Denis's Watford medals if you would like them to be posted here. Obviously that will take a while for him to do, but in the meantime hopefully the proof the attached programme provides will be of interest to you. Ian's dad
136:
is probably as accurate as a stat book can be. The book references Football Association records, club records, various libraries and record offices, the details of various other club statisticians. No Cashmore is listed, thus we can say with 99.9% certainty that no such player played for Watford. So,
166:
I actually represent Denis's grandson Ian Cashmore (Trefor would be his great uncle) for his tv and radio work, and he has asked me to deal with this for him, which is why I have made these posts on his behalf, but I have no problem asking him for Trefor's details, and for a copy of a programme if
162:
Would it help if I can get a copy of a Watford football programme showing Denis? I understand why you have to be vigilant on which articles you include, but I can assure you that the information is 100% accurate. Moreover, would it be useful to get Trefor to write a corroborating letter, or have
158:
I am not sure why Denis is not listed in the current Who's Who, as he has been in previous editions. In fact Trefor Jones is actually related to Denis (his nephew), as his mother was Denis's sister. You can verify this be contacting Trefor Jones direct, or via the archives at either the Watford
185:
A letter from Trefor would be classed as original research I'm afraid - are there previous copies of the who's who floating about somewhere? What we need is something like that from either Watford Football club or another media source that identifies him as a
252:
I have now received a copy of a Watford football programme from Ian dated 30 November 1929 which shows D.Cashmore in the players lineup. I have posted a copy of the cover of this programme together with the players diagram and an enlargement of
220:
PS. By the way, I think HornetMike has misread the article, as it was not Denis who designed the Family Enclosure, it was his son Raymond (Ian's dad) who did this. It was part of a competition in the early 80's which Ray won.
347:. Hi guys, thanks for all your help. I spoke yesterday evening with Ian who was going to try to call Trefor to see if he could provide any more info. He is also getting hold of some accompaning pictures to go on Denis's page. 261:
Ian has pledged to check his grandfather's listing on here soon (as his schedule allows), and provide any additional dates / names etc which might be required. I have also just added more exact dates to the main listing.
210:
I am sure there are previous editions around. I am going to ask Ian to get onto Trefor (who will no doubt have copies of them all!!! And I will also ask him to get hold of a Watford programme if possible.
109:. The info sounds entirely plausible but given the near non-notability of the person, the author really has to give some citations or verification. Without that, it's impossible to judge the veracity. 64:
Person seems to be entirely fictional (hoax). I can find no reference to either the father or the son playing for watford FC - very strange indeed. Seems to be connected in some way to the
97:- yes same author - Ian Cashmore seems to be real, his father seems to be real - his grandfather and greatgrandfather's career for Watford FC? Seems to be fictional. -- 258:
is also going to contact Trefor, but since any evidence he can provide seems to "not be admissbale(!)" I am not sure what he will be able to offer.
333:
OK, now it's been verified. Very odd for Trefor to make a mistake! (I would keep it out the Watford notable players section, though.)
17: 288: 283: 318: 413: 36: 395: 383: 371: 358: 337: 325: 308: 298: 271: 242: 194: 141: 124: 101: 89: 72: 52: 155:
I can assure you that "this person" is certainly not a hoax, and I am just glad that his family have not seen this.
294:
I have reduced the image sizes to prevent page clutter. Full sized versions can be seen by clicking on each one.
412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
58: 85:
but it appears to have been written by the same author as our article. I will see what else I can find.
355: 268: 65: 49: 380: 305: 224: 191: 173: 98: 69: 391:
because the article status is verified, better include those images into the article though. --
351:
Now that the article has been verified, when will it cease to be "awaiting possible deletion"?
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
322: 295: 238: 110: 86: 368: 334: 138: 214:
Thinking about it, I might the club a call and see if they have something on file there.
392: 265:
Thanks for your help, and I hope that this will resolve the validity of the listing.
317:
Now that the article has been verified, it seems as notable as any of the others in
234: 82: 277: 367:
Should be whenever an admin approves it. Within the next few days...
217:
Thanks for your advice, and I'll get back to you when I have more!
406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
304:
My apologies for my previous claims of "fictional person" - --
287: 282: 170:
Please let me know what you need from me to resolve this.
206:
Thanks for getting back to me so quickly Charlesknight!
81:. I had thought I had found some partial verification 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 416:). No further edits should be made to this page. 134:The Watford Football Club Illustrated Who's Who 8: 233:, or smerge to the notable relative's page. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 159:Museum or Watford Football Club. 286: 281: 276: 1: 319:Category:Watford F.C. players 44:The result of the debate was 68:article - unsure of reason 433: 396:00:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 384:12:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 372:12:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 359:09:23, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 338:00:54, 21 June 2006 (UTC) 326:21:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 309:19:57, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 299:19:54, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 272:17:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 243:16:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 195:13:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC) 151:Thanks for your messages. 142:22:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 125:22:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 102:00:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 90:00:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 73:00:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC) 53:00:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC) 409:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 59:Denis_William_Cashmore 167:this is any use? 424: 411: 290: 285: 280: 132:- Trefor Jones' 122: 117: 34: 432: 431: 427: 426: 425: 423: 422: 421: 420: 414:deletion review 407: 118: 111: 62: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 430: 428: 419: 418: 401: 399: 398: 386: 374: 349: 348: 341: 340: 328: 302: 301: 255: 254: 246: 245: 208: 207: 199: 188: 187: 178: 153: 152: 145: 144: 127: 104: 92: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 429: 417: 415: 410: 404: 403: 402: 397: 394: 390: 387: 385: 382: 381:Charlesknight 378: 375: 373: 370: 366: 363: 362: 361: 360: 357: 354:Thanks again 352: 346: 343: 342: 339: 336: 332: 329: 327: 324: 320: 316: 313: 312: 311: 310: 307: 306:Charlesknight 300: 297: 293: 292: 291: 289: 284: 279: 274: 273: 270: 266: 263: 259: 251: 248: 247: 244: 240: 236: 232: 229: 228: 227: 226: 222: 218: 215: 212: 205: 202: 201: 200: 197: 196: 193: 192:Charlesknight 184: 181: 180: 179: 176: 175: 171: 168: 164: 160: 156: 150: 147: 146: 143: 140: 135: 131: 128: 126: 123: 121: 116: 115: 108: 105: 103: 100: 99:Charlesknight 96: 93: 91: 88: 84: 80: 77: 76: 75: 74: 71: 70:Charlesknight 67: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 408: 405: 400: 388: 376: 364: 353: 350: 344: 330: 314: 303: 275: 267: 264: 260: 256: 249: 230: 223: 219: 216: 213: 209: 203: 198: 189: 182: 177: 172: 169: 165: 163:some input? 161: 157: 154: 148: 133: 129: 119: 113: 112: 106: 94: 78: 66:Ian Cashmore 63: 45: 43: 31: 28: 379:as above -- 356:PeterCarrig 323:Road Wizard 296:Road Wizard 269:PeterCarrig 225:PeterCarrig 174:PeterCarrig 87:Road Wizard 369:HornetMike 335:HornetMike 139:HornetMike 393:WinHunter 365:Comment 345:Comment 186:player. 183:Comment 95:Comment 79:Comment 50:W.marsh 235:Stifle 231:Delete 130:Delete 120:lingua 107:Delete 377:Keep. 315:Keep. 253:such. 114:Inter 16:< 389:Keep 331:Keep 250:Keep 239:talk 204:Keep 149:Keep 83:here 46:keep 321:. 241:) 190:-- 48:. 237:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
W.marsh
00:42, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Denis_William_Cashmore
Ian Cashmore
Charlesknight
00:07, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
here
Road Wizard
00:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Charlesknight
00:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
Interlingua
22:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
HornetMike
22:25, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
PeterCarrig
Charlesknight
13:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
PeterCarrig
Stifle
talk
16:10, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
PeterCarrig
17:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)



Road Wizard

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.