Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Densa - Knowledge

Source đź“ť

268:
If some organization had multiple independent reliable sources with substantial coverage, then absolutely ceased to exist one day after the last reference was published, it would still be notable, because notability is permanent.
146:
no independant sources. given that meetings are now few, and it was seen as a vehicle for scientists' irony, rather than standing up for the stupid, and we can't get good references within a year, it needs to go.
195: 123: 189: 185: 176: 198:) just opined "strong keep" in 27 AFD discussions over a period of 35 minutes, several times with clearly disruptive rationales. 17: 314:(there are 1.6 million results if you don't include "Mensa" in the search, because you end up catching countless pages with 256:
per Edison. Just because may not be active now does not mean it should be deleted. References now establish notability.
163:
gets 1.6 million Google hits exclusive of Knowledge. A humorous alternative to Mensa, which has been around for decades.
339: 96: 91: 36: 338:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
100: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
83: 286: 242:
What does it matter when the reference was? Knowledge is not just for things in the news lately. --
243: 229:), which makes me question whether it's worth having an article on. Despite two references in the 226: 214: 324: 290: 273: 260: 246: 237: 217: 202: 179: 167: 151: 137: 65: 59: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
225:
Where are you getting the 1.6 million hits figure from? The organization seems defunct now (
311: 282: 319: 159:
Densa now has three New York Times references and a book in the article as references.
257: 131: 199: 51: 117: 270: 164: 148: 234: 134: 87: 318:, which is "dense" in Spanish, Italian, Latin and other languages). — 297: 79: 71: 332:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
306:
notable as a real organisation, but it is notable as a
113: 109: 105: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 342:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 213:thanks for the referencing, Edison. -- 7: 296:Condense to a brief section in the 233:, the last one was back in 1999. -- 186:Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 177:Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend? 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 359: 325:08:12, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 291:07:34, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 274:05:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC) 261:20:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 247:19:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 238:19:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 218:18:23, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 203:17:00, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 180:16:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 175:per Edison's reasoning. -- 168:15:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 152:12:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 138:06:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC) 66:17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC) 335:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 300:article, and redirect. 312:40,000 Google results 205: 130:Non-notable, see 350: 337: 184: 121: 103: 62: 54: 34: 358: 357: 353: 352: 351: 349: 348: 347: 346: 340:deletion review 333: 94: 78: 75: 60: 52: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 356: 354: 345: 344: 328: 327: 293: 276: 263: 251: 250: 249: 220: 208: 207: 206: 170: 154: 128: 127: 74: 69: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 355: 343: 341: 336: 330: 329: 326: 323: 322: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 299: 294: 292: 288: 284: 281:Per Edison.-- 280: 277: 275: 272: 267: 264: 262: 259: 255: 252: 248: 245: 241: 240: 239: 236: 232: 228: 227:archived site 224: 221: 219: 216: 212: 209: 204: 201: 197: 194: 191: 187: 183: 182: 181: 178: 174: 171: 169: 166: 162: 158: 155: 153: 150: 145: 142: 141: 140: 139: 136: 133: 125: 119: 115: 111: 107: 102: 98: 93: 89: 85: 81: 77: 76: 73: 70: 68: 67: 64: 63: 57: 56: 55: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 334: 331: 320: 315: 307: 303: 295: 278: 265: 253: 230: 222: 210: 192: 172: 160: 156: 143: 129: 58: 50: 49: 45: 43: 31: 28: 302:"Densa" is 173:Strong Keep 308:common pun 321:Chameleon 283:Dwaipayan 258:Davewild 196:contribs 124:View log 266:Comment 244:W.marsh 223:Comment 215:W.marsh 200:Uncle G 97:protect 92:history 53:Majorly 271:Edison 165:Edison 149:Callix 144:Delete 132:WP:ORG 101:delete 61:(hot!) 316:densa 310:with 298:Mensa 235:CA387 231:Times 211:Keep' 161:Densa 135:CA387 118:views 110:watch 106:links 80:Densa 72:Densa 16:< 287:talk 279:Keep 254:Keep 190:talk 157:Keep 114:logs 88:talk 84:edit 46:keep 304:not 122:– ( 289:) 116:| 112:| 108:| 104:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 48:. 285:( 193:· 188:( 126:) 120:) 82:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Majorly
(hot!)
17:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Densa
Densa
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
WP:ORG
CA387
06:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Callix
12:48, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Edison
15:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?
16:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedian, Historian, and Friend?
talk
contribs
Uncle G

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑