619:: A quick Google search turns up absolutely nothing but links to the owners site, YouTube videos uploaded by the creator (which seem to be directly challenging "Republicrats" - which I question the notability of as is, but that's another matter), and links to this Knowledge article (and AfD). If that's not a grab at attention for the purpose of promotion, I don't know what is.
347:
I'm not sure what the purpose of rhetorical questions in this matter is, but needless to say, the "Yes Men" are also in the position of being a highly notable group. In my honest opinion, they appear to be more of a political movement than organization of individuals, but that point I find to be
531:
for the purpose of seemingly driving visitors to their site to gain hits, and potential revenue while trying to use non-existent terminology in the process - possibly for the purpose of garnering attention by coining a term in the political world. Additionally, the page is nothing more than a
234:
381:
805:. The only "sources" I found for this are cases of newspaper articles that didn't OCR correctly. They use the word "Republican", but the scanning software rendered it as "Depublican".
414:
471:
189:
228:
497:
348:
moot. What does them being a political organization have to do with the matter at hand? Additionally, I should point out that with regard to
Depublican,
556:, and relies entirely upon it's own website for promotion and verification of said article up for deletion which is being vigorously defended by
162:
157:
194:
166:
840:
149:
818:
322:
17:
852:- Seemingly a smartassish retort to "Republicrat," which is a term actually used that may or may not be worthy of inclusion.
116:
111:
836:
120:
249:
216:
787:
736:
103:
876:
36:
875:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
660:
438:
265:
I contested the prod on this myself only because I think AfD would work better in this case. Anyway, this is a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
523:
I'm not quite sure that a "pull-the-trigger-it's-a-hoax!" is quite valid here, but it definitely is evident
210:
153:
732:
715:
695:
456:
206:
861:
844:
827:
793:
761:
740:
719:
699:
675:
666:
634:
609:
583:
537:
512:
486:
461:
441:
426:
399:
367:
342:
326:
301:
282:
145:
85:
61:
813:
757:
318:
310:
107:
655:
646:
435:
273:(which has questionable notability itself). There isn't a speedy criterion for this kind of thing.
242:
256:
81:
707:
687:
99:
91:
49:
292:
has the creator full-on admitting that s/he created the term. This is a borderline speedy now.
857:
711:
691:
650:
524:
508:
482:
422:
65:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
533:
452:
338:
297:
278:
808:
783:
753:
620:
595:
569:
385:
353:
314:
53:
686:(unambiguous advertising or promotion). I have declined a speedy deletion nomination of
222:
774:
728:
528:
802:
770:
749:
683:
679:
561:
541:
349:
266:
77:
73:
69:
57:
853:
549:
545:
504:
478:
418:
306:
Do the "Yes Men" have a page? Do they qualify as a political organization? -----
183:
137:
565:
553:
377:
270:
778:
449:. This is a hoax, or else promotion of a non-notable political invention.
544:
that it's not even remotely close to funny. It also inherently violates
682:(no indication of importance). I think it was also borderline for
869:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
289:
179:
175:
171:
133:
129:
125:
241:
540:
which shares in the attribute that it pushes so much
472:list of Organizations-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
879:). No further edits should be made to this page.
415:WP:Knowledge is not for things made up one day
498:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
255:
8:
651:Knowledge is not for things made up one day
560:the website's owner which further violates
382:Republicrat has been nominated for deletion
615:
590:
492:
466:
417:and request more tin foil for Crashmodem.
372:
269:that appears to want to be a spin-off of
496:: This debate has been included in the
470:: This debate has been included in the
690:under CSD A7, as it does not qualify.
376:: Through what seems to be an act of
7:
710:. No evidence of notability at all.
24:
536:), and it's sister "article" is
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
532:"definition" (this is not the
1:
769:- no evidence of notability,
380:, should such a thing exist,
350:Knowledge is not a dictionary
550:third-party reliable sources
434:as non-notable neologism. --
86:11:10, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
896:
862:22:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
845:00:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
828:07:08, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
794:05:37, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
762:05:26, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
741:04:11, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
720:22:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
700:22:10, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
667:22:05, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
635:21:00, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
610:20:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
584:20:52, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
558:what we can only assume is
513:18:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
487:18:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
462:17:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
442:16:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
427:16:02, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
400:23:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
368:23:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
343:14:51, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
327:09:17, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
302:06:36, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
283:06:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
527:that is nothing short of
872:Please do not modify it.
837:Regent of the Seatopians
32:Please do not modify it.
594:: See: Vodello (above)
674:I have speedy-deleted
777:applies as well. ---
339:(let's talk about it)
298:(let's talk about it)
279:(let's talk about it)
267:non-notable neologism
548:, has absolutely no
773:- and looking like
552:for the purpose of
835:Nonsensical hoax.
559:
46:speedy delete both
44:The result was
791:
733:Everard Proudfoot
637:
612:
564:. Did I mention,
557:
515:
501:
489:
475:
402:
341:
330:
313:comment added by
300:
281:
74:Non-admin closure
66:User:JamesBWatson
887:
874:
826:
823:
816:
811:
781:
676:Depublican Party
663:
658:
632:
629:
626:
623:
607:
604:
601:
598:
581:
578:
575:
572:
538:Depublican Party
534:Urban Dictionary
502:
476:
460:
397:
394:
391:
388:
365:
362:
359:
356:
337:
329:
307:
296:
277:
260:
259:
245:
197:
187:
169:
146:Depublican Party
141:
123:
62:Depublican Party
34:
895:
894:
890:
889:
888:
886:
885:
884:
883:
877:deletion review
870:
822:
819:
814:
809:
806:
661:
656:
630:
627:
624:
621:
605:
602:
599:
596:
579:
576:
573:
570:
521:Speedily Delete
450:
395:
392:
389:
386:
363:
360:
357:
354:
308:
202:
193:
160:
144:
114:
98:
95:
54:User:SchuminWeb
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
893:
891:
882:
881:
865:
864:
847:
830:
820:
796:
764:
743:
722:
702:
669:
639:
638:
617:Secondary Note
613:
587:
586:
525:self-promotion
517:
516:
490:
464:
444:
436:Metropolitan90
429:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
370:
345:
288:Actually, the
263:
262:
199:
195:AfD statistics
142:
94:
89:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
892:
880:
878:
873:
867:
866:
863:
859:
855:
851:
850:Speedy Delete
848:
846:
842:
838:
834:
833:Speedy Delete
831:
829:
825:
824:
817:
812:
804:
800:
797:
795:
789:
785:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
744:
742:
738:
734:
730:
726:
725:Speedy delete
723:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
670:
668:
665:
664:
659:
652:
648:
644:
641:
640:
636:
633:
618:
614:
611:
608:
593:
589:
588:
585:
582:
567:
563:
555:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
530:
526:
522:
519:
518:
514:
510:
506:
499:
495:
491:
488:
484:
480:
473:
469:
465:
463:
458:
454:
448:
445:
443:
440:
437:
433:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
412:Speedy Delete
410:
409:
401:
398:
383:
379:
375:
371:
369:
366:
351:
346:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
305:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
285:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
258:
254:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
212:
208:
205:
204:Find sources:
200:
196:
191:
185:
181:
177:
173:
168:
164:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
93:
90:
88:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
871:
868:
849:
832:
807:
798:
766:
745:
724:
712:JamesBWatson
704:
692:JamesBWatson
671:
654:
647:WP:NEOLOGISM
642:
616:
591:
554:verification
520:
493:
467:
446:
431:
411:
373:
334:
293:
274:
264:
252:
246:
238:
231:
225:
219:
213:
203:
45:
43:
31:
28:
453:Gavia immer
378:coincidence
309:—Preceding
271:Republicrat
229:free images
754:Shadowjams
708:Depublican
688:Depublican
315:Crashmodem
100:Depublican
92:Depublican
50:Depublican
505:• Gene93k
479:• Gene93k
290:talk page
788:contribs
657:elektrik
323:contribs
311:unsigned
190:View log
78:Pgallert
854:Carrite
775:WP:SNOW
729:WP:HOAX
684:CSD G11
672:Comment
419:Vodello
235:WP refs
223:scholar
163:protect
158:history
117:protect
112:history
810:Imzadi
803:WP:NEO
801:fails
799:Delete
771:WP:NEO
767:Delete
750:WP:NEO
746:Delete
705:Delete
680:CSD A7
678:under
645:fails
643:Delete
562:WP:COI
447:Delete
439:(talk)
432:Delete
335:Erpert
294:Erpert
275:Erpert
207:Google
167:delete
121:delete
779:Barek
662:SHOOS
546:WP:OR
333:Huh?
250:JSTOR
211:books
184:views
176:watch
172:links
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
858:talk
841:talk
815:1979
784:talk
758:talk
737:talk
727:per
716:talk
696:talk
592:Note
566:WP:N
529:spam
509:talk
494:Note
483:talk
468:Note
457:talk
423:talk
374:Note
319:talk
243:FENS
217:news
180:logs
154:talk
150:edit
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
82:talk
731:.
628:ⒽⒶⓃ
625:ⓁⒼⓄ
622:ⒺⓋⒾ
603:ⒽⒶⓃ
600:ⓁⒼⓄ
597:ⒺⓋⒾ
577:ⒽⒶⓃ
574:ⓁⒼⓄ
571:ⒺⓋⒾ
542:POV
503:--
477:--
393:ⒽⒶⓃ
390:ⓁⒼⓄ
387:ⒺⓋⒾ
361:ⒽⒶⓃ
358:ⓁⒼⓄ
355:ⒺⓋⒾ
257:TWL
192:•
188:– (
68:as
64:by
56:as
52:by
860:)
843:)
792:-
786:•
760:)
752:.
748:-
739:)
718:)
698:)
653:.
649:.
568:?
511:)
500:.
485:)
474:.
451:—
425:)
384:.
352:.
325:)
321:•
237:)
182:|
178:|
174:|
170:|
165:|
161:|
156:|
152:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
84:)
76:--
72:.
70:A7
60:,
58:G3
48:,
856:(
839:(
821:→
790:)
782:(
756:(
735:(
714:(
694:(
631:②
606:②
580:②
507:(
481:(
459:)
455:(
421:(
396:②
364:②
317:(
261:)
253:·
247:·
239:·
232:·
226:·
220:·
214:·
209:(
201:(
198:)
186:)
148:(
140:)
102:(
80:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.