171:
While I would have imagined otherwise from the Man of the Year (Playgirl) title, I did not find reliable, secondary sources providing in-depth coverage of this male model and personal trainer in order to evidence notability under GNG, nor reliable sources to verify the claim under any theory of
263:, cover image above sources the claim. I could quibble about whether that site is correctly reproducing the cover, but even I'm not that pedantic. The link I provided includes a picture, "Man of the year 2006", the Playgirl title, and the guys name, I'm convinced. --
172:
inherent notability. Some blog coverage, and I'm sure the books in the bio include photos of him, but I don't see via Google or in the article history any biographical coverage. Additional sources welcomed, as always.
139:
225:
The publication in question would reliably verify it wouldn't it? We don't need a copy of the magazine itself if digital reproductions of the cover have him on it and the words "MAN OF THE YEAR" somewhere.—
189:: The award as Man of the Year signifies that he is notable. The secondary and/or reliable sources you would be looking for would be found in the magazine, I would guess, and that satisfies
100:
133:
73:
68:
77:
243:
Sorry, we edit conflicted, I'm withdrawing based on the information visible on that cover. Give me a sec and I'll mkae it official. --
212:
211:
If that can be reliably verified, I have no trouble with calling the claim notable. Appears the relevant issue would be June '06, says
60:
17:
154:
121:
284:
36:
115:
283:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
269:
249:
238:
220:
206:
178:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
111:
64:
161:
267:
247:
218:
176:
147:
127:
232:
200:
56:
48:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
190:
264:
244:
215:
173:
226:
194:
94:
277:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
90:
86:
82:
146:
160:
193:, which is the ruling notability guideline here.—
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
287:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
44:The result was Withdrawn by nominator
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
304:
270:00:57, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
250:00:56, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
239:00:55, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
221:00:52, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
207:20:17, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
179:20:10, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
280:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
182:Withdraw, see below.
57:Derrick Davenport
49:Derrick Davenport
295:
282:
235:
229:
203:
197:
165:
164:
150:
98:
80:
34:
303:
302:
298:
297:
296:
294:
293:
292:
291:
285:deletion review
278:
261:Withdraw as nom
233:
227:
201:
195:
107:
71:
55:
52:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
301:
299:
290:
289:
273:
272:
258:
257:
256:
255:
254:
253:
252:
168:
167:
104:
51:
46:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
300:
288:
286:
281:
275:
274:
271:
268:
266:
262:
259:
251:
248:
246:
242:
241:
240:
236:
230:
224:
223:
222:
219:
217:
213:
210:
209:
208:
204:
198:
192:
188:
185:
184:
183:
181:
180:
177:
175:
163:
159:
156:
153:
149:
145:
141:
138:
135:
132:
129:
126:
123:
120:
117:
113:
110:
109:Find sources:
105:
102:
96:
92:
88:
84:
79:
75:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:
50:
47:
45:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
279:
276:
260:
186:
170:
169:
157:
151:
143:
136:
130:
124:
118:
108:
43:
31:
28:
134:free images
265:joe decker
245:joe decker
216:joe decker
174:joe decker
101:View log
228:Ryūlóng
196:Ryūlóng
140:WP refs
128:scholar
74:protect
69:history
191:WP:BIO
112:Google
78:delete
155:JSTOR
116:books
95:views
87:watch
83:links
16:<
214:. --
187:Keep
148:FENS
122:news
91:logs
65:talk
61:edit
162:TWL
99:– (
237:)
234:竜龙
205:)
202:竜龙
142:)
93:|
89:|
85:|
81:|
76:|
72:|
67:|
63:|
231:(
199:(
166:)
158:·
152:·
144:·
137:·
131:·
125:·
119:·
114:(
106:(
103:)
97:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.