Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Descendants of Adam and Eve - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

306:. That's not enough. The article collects information from various books of the bible into a single list, and saying that someone can just look it up in the bible is like saying that anyone can just do their own research instead of reading a Knowledge (XXG) article. Why does Knowledge (XXG) exist then? We cover notable topics in Knowledge (XXG), whether or not a given editor finds the topic personally useful. Many bible topics including this one are notable and this may include many "minor" or lesser known characters, but there are major ones on the list as well. 538:
other editors to contribute to this page as it is the project of a small team of users. It just seems like the creators of this really should create their own website for this rather than store it on Knowledge (XXG) in their own format. I'm sure the editors are acting in good faith (no pun intended) but I feel the page has potential
380:"lived 969 years", "first murder victim", "spilled his seed", etc. I'm surprised at the argument that this should be deleted because people "can look at 1 Chronicles, chapters 1 to 9, or whatever". Maybe all Knowledge (XXG) articles should be redirected to a sign that says "Go to the public library." 379:
Actually, a fairly efficient way of showing the relationship between the progeny of Adam and Eve as stated in the Bible; this one goes 55 generations, although there's room for more (Jesus was at the 76th generation). Hopefully, someone will add a few words for some of these folks-- "built the Ark",
537:
I'll agree that this list is very useful for some people, but for me it is somewhat problematic as a WP article. The format, while very creative, doesn't really suit WP--it doesn't conform to any existing template or style. That may seem like a pointless complaint, but it would be very hard for
517:
If you have ideas for how to improve it, then we'd be delighted to hear them. However this is at present our best effort. It seems odd that some are calling to keep it on the basis that it's more readable than the prose sources of Chronicles, but others wish to delete it because it's not readable
496:
Strictly speaking, this should contain everyone listed in Knowledge (XXG), or at least everyone ever mentioned in the bible. But be that as it may, I find in practice that anything below the first screenful is an unreadable mess; I cannot establish
392:- simple, straightforward layout that is referenced. As for, "Plus, it has a whole lot of question marks, and few of the wikilinks are actually to articles about those people" - these are areas for improvement, not good arguments for deletion. 159: 194:, chapters 1 to 9, or whatever. This list doesn't make the genealogy easier to understand. Plus, it has a whole lot of question marks, and few of the wikilinks are actually to articles about those people 153: 115: 219: 416:- as above; The list is simple, with links to the Biblical people, and with specific references. I cannot find such an efficient article on the subject on the entire Internet. -— 245: 88: 83: 271: 92: 75: 362:. This is good information, and is nicely compiled. It has references. Also, it could be under the category of Christianity. So yeah, definitely keep. 174: 141: 17: 344: 323: 200: 135: 551: 527: 510: 486: 467: 443: 426: 408: 384: 371: 352: 315: 293: 260: 234: 208: 57: 131: 566: 36: 79: 181: 120: 256: 230: 71: 63: 565:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
402: 287: 523: 439: 335: 331: 147: 53: 547: 477:- most useful for our core readership: students. I have one quibble: it's too long for easy editing. 367: 363: 252: 226: 303: 311: 167: 190:
This is not a helpful list. If people want to read the genealogies in the Bible, then can look at
394: 348: 279: 204: 519: 482: 435: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
518:
enough. If we already have some idealised genealogy display for this, please point me at it.
506: 49: 539: 543: 381: 307: 451: 339: 195: 434:
Just on the basis of formatting and readability, this has the edge on 1 Chronicles.
478: 327: 191: 109: 502: 419: 450:
Hah! Totally agree, I have no intention of reading 1 Chronicles.
559:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
105: 101: 97: 166: 180: 220:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 569:). No further edits should be made to this page. 501:most of these people are descended from Adam. 8: 246:list of Judaism-related deletion discussions 272:list of Lists-related deletion discussions 266: 240: 214: 270:: This debate has been included in the 244:: This debate has been included in the 218:: This debate has been included in the 542:issues due to its 'pet project' feel.-- 302:It seems that StAnselm's argument is 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 322:You do realise that we already have 24: 324:List of minor Biblical figures 1: 552:09:38, 20 November 2010 (UTC) 528:15:14, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 511:13:36, 16 November 2010 (UTC) 487:22:15, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 468:11:31, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 444:01:36, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 427:20:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 409:20:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 385:18:23, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 372:17:29, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 353:08:32, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 316:07:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 294:20:11, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 261:06:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 235:06:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 209:06:20, 14 November 2010 (UTC) 58:12:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC) 72:Descendants of Adam and Eve 64:Descendants of Adam and Eve 586: 562:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 336:Genealogies of Genesis 332:Abraham's family tree 44:The result was 296: 275: 263: 249: 237: 223: 577: 564: 465: 464: 461: 458: 455: 422: 407: 405: 401: 397: 292: 290: 286: 282: 276: 250: 224: 185: 184: 170: 123: 113: 95: 34: 585: 584: 580: 579: 578: 576: 575: 574: 573: 567:deletion review 560: 462: 459: 456: 453: 452: 420: 403: 399: 395: 393: 288: 284: 280: 278: 253:Jclemens-public 227:Jclemens-public 127: 119: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 583: 581: 572: 571: 555: 554: 531: 530: 514: 513: 490: 489: 471: 470: 447: 446: 429: 411: 387: 374: 356: 355: 319: 318: 297: 264: 238: 188: 187: 124: 121:Afd statistics 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 582: 570: 568: 563: 557: 556: 553: 549: 545: 541: 536: 533: 532: 529: 525: 521: 516: 515: 512: 508: 504: 500: 495: 492: 491: 488: 484: 480: 476: 473: 472: 469: 466: 449: 448: 445: 441: 437: 433: 430: 428: 425: 424: 423: 415: 412: 410: 406: 398: 391: 388: 386: 383: 378: 375: 373: 369: 365: 361: 358: 357: 354: 350: 346: 343: 342: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 298: 295: 291: 283: 273: 269: 265: 262: 258: 254: 247: 243: 239: 236: 232: 228: 221: 217: 213: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 199: 198: 193: 183: 179: 176: 173: 169: 165: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 140: 137: 133: 130: 129:Find sources: 125: 122: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 561: 558: 534: 520:Andy Dingley 498: 493: 474: 436:Andy Dingley 431: 418: 417: 413: 389: 376: 359: 340: 328:Sons of Noah 299: 267: 241: 215: 196: 192:1 Chronicles 189: 177: 171: 163: 156: 150: 144: 138: 128: 45: 43: 31: 28: 154:free images 50:Ron Ritzman 544:Johnsemlak 364:Endofskull 304:WP:USELESS 382:Mandsford 308:Cullen328 116:View log 535:Comment 479:Bearian 404:Shalott 289:Shalott 160:WP refs 148:scholar 89:protect 84:history 540:WP:OWN 503:Mangoe 494:Delete 421:AMK152 345:Anselm 201:Anselm 132:Google 93:delete 175:JSTOR 136:books 118:) • 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 548:talk 524:talk 507:talk 483:talk 475:Keep 440:talk 432:Keep 414:Keep 396:Lady 390:Keep 377:Keep 368:talk 360:Keep 349:talk 334:and 312:talk 300:Keep 281:Lady 268:Note 257:talk 242:Note 231:talk 216:Note 205:talk 168:FENS 142:news 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 46:keep 499:how 463:ve 457:e S 251:-- 225:-- 182:TWL 114:– ( 550:) 526:) 509:) 485:) 460:te 454:Th 442:) 400:of 370:) 351:) 341:St 338:? 330:, 326:, 314:) 285:of 274:. 259:) 248:. 233:) 222:. 207:) 197:St 162:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 546:( 522:( 505:( 481:( 438:( 366:( 347:( 310:( 277:— 255:( 229:( 203:( 186:) 178:· 172:· 164:· 157:· 151:· 145:· 139:· 134:( 126:( 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Ron Ritzman
talk
12:46, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Descendants of Adam and Eve
Descendants of Adam and Eve
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Afd statistics
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
1 Chronicles
St
Anselm

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.