191:
There does not appear to be any third-party sources indicating notability of this company. The article's references do not appear to provide any support of notability either. With the conflict of interest evident with the article's creator, this seems to be merely promotional.
160:
115:
154:
275:
249:
475:
There's a request I have not seen before. I don't know the answer, I'm afraid. Perhaps someone here does, or you could ask... possibly at the "Help desk".
120:
88:
83:
437:
The article creator wanted it deleted, so I asked him to blank the page, whereupon I slapped a db-g7 speedy on it, which moots this section.
429:
92:
75:
17:
463:
385:
175:
142:
210:
Does seem to read as promotional. No real establishment of secondary sourcing either. As the article stands currrently fails
514:
36:
136:
426:
499:
479:
467:
441:
432:
408:
389:
343:
322:
307:
290:
264:
239:
222:
201:
57:
513:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
132:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
79:
451:
373:
235:
182:
420:
Ad-like and no references. I've got to admit though: Kyle's above comment gave me a chuckle or two. ;) --
218:
71:
63:
459:
455:
421:
381:
377:
492:
401:
315:
300:
168:
488:
491:, although "user in good standing" might be iffy. Also, that's a rather overcomplicated process.
355:
Please delete the article, just got a better source and quotation from
Encyclopaedia Britannica
148:
363:
As an employee in charge of these operations, I am hereby ordering you to remove this article.
286:
260:
231:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
214:
211:
197:
49:
230:
few if any 3rd party references in appropriate publications to establish notability.--
476:
438:
357:
The only
Internet Resource about Statistics Recommended by Encyclopaedia Britannica.
282:
256:
109:
339:
193:
48:. Author requested deletion via page-blanking; I have duly deleted the page.
312:
The aforementioned creator now is asking how to delete the whole thing:
447:
Thanks, now how do I remove myself from wikipedia? disabled account?
333:
507:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
332:
not many 3rd party refs available, seems to be non-notable.
313:
105:
101:
97:
167:
181:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
517:). No further edits should be made to this page.
276:list of Business-related deletion discussions
250:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
400:vote, straight from the article's creator.
270:
244:
299:It's ad copy; sources are not much help.
274:: This debate has been included in the
248:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
396:And I guess we can consider that a
24:
1:
340:(Formerly Known as FireSpike)
500:08:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
480:08:43, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
468:08:39, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
442:08:37, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
433:08:17, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
409:08:34, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
390:08:11, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
344:07:54, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
323:07:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
308:07:53, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
291:00:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
265:00:52, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
240:23:10, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
223:18:14, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
202:17:07, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
58:08:47, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
534:
510:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
72:Desktop Scientific
64:Desktop Scientific
44:The result was
471:
454:comment added by
393:
376:comment added by
342:
293:
279:
267:
253:
525:
512:
497:
470:
448:
424:
406:
392:
370:
338:
320:
305:
280:
254:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
533:
532:
528:
527:
526:
524:
523:
522:
521:
515:deletion review
508:
493:
449:
422:
402:
371:
316:
301:
128:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
531:
529:
520:
519:
504:
503:
502:
483:
482:
445:
444:
435:
414:
413:
412:
411:
367:
364:
360:
359:
352:
351:
347:
346:
327:
326:
325:
294:
268:
242:
232:Torchwood Who?
225:
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
530:
518:
516:
511:
505:
501:
498:
496:
490:
487:
486:
485:
484:
481:
478:
474:
473:
472:
469:
465:
461:
457:
453:
443:
440:
436:
434:
431:
430:(Opus Operis)
428:
425:
419:
416:
415:
410:
407:
405:
399:
395:
394:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
368:
365:
362:
361:
358:
354:
353:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
336:
331:
328:
324:
321:
319:
314:
311:
310:
309:
306:
304:
298:
295:
292:
288:
284:
277:
273:
269:
266:
262:
258:
251:
247:
243:
241:
237:
233:
229:
226:
224:
220:
216:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
52:
47:
46:speedy delete
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
509:
506:
494:
446:
417:
403:
397:
356:
334:
329:
317:
302:
296:
271:
245:
227:
207:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
53:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
450:—Preceding
372:—Preceding
215:Ottawa4ever
155:free images
456:KyleAraujo
423:Mithrandir
378:KyleAraujo
489:WP:VANISH
283:• Gene93k
257:• Gene93k
477:Jusdafax
464:contribs
452:unsigned
439:Jusdafax
386:contribs
374:unsigned
116:View log
427:(Talk!)
194:Peacock
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
495:Şłџğģő
418:Delete
404:Şłџğģő
398:delete
369:Kyle
366:Thanks
330:Delete
318:Şłџğģő
303:Şłџğģő
297:Delete
228:Delete
212:WP:ORG
208:Delete
133:Google
93:delete
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
460:talk
382:talk
287:talk
272:Note
261:talk
246:Note
236:talk
219:talk
198:talk
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
51:TFOW
350:Hi,
281:--
255:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
466:)
462:•
388:)
384:•
289:)
278:.
263:)
252:.
238:)
221:)
200:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
458:(
380:(
335:T
285:(
259:(
234:(
217:(
196:(
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
54:R
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.