287:. Sources exist. The concept is sound, once you think of it, complementing design for manufacturability. For example, the Google search yields academic article "Design for inspection of concrete bridges", for just one. The article itself does not have to be merely a how-to guide; it can/should give history of the concept and survey where it is most applicable, etc....a matter of editing not cause for deletion. --
404:
Design For
Inspection is a concept within manufacturing engineering that should be considered concurrently with design for manufacture or design for x, this allows a suitable measurement plan to be created to ensure the product conformity but also highlights features and tolerances that will be
313:
Amendments to the page have been made and I hope these are acceptable. The Design for
Inspection is a consideration at the design stage that is commonly overlooked and represents significant cost implications for industry and one that is important to highlight. Please let me know if further
183:
405:
difficult or impossible to measure. Within engineering if there is something you can't measure to the specification then you can't manufacture it as there is no way to confirm conformance.
136:
177:
259:
234:
272:
247:
370:- Is not traditionally part of DFx, and the intro needs rewriting, but DFI has papers written about it and makes sense from an engineering perspective.
109:
104:
113:
143:
420:
263:
238:
96:
388:
330:
72:
198:
165:
17:
298:
159:
424:
396:
379:
360:
334:
303:
276:
251:
226:
78:
345:
100:
155:
444:
416:
40:
392:
205:
412:
326:
66:
440:
356:
322:
92:
84:
36:
408:
318:
191:
171:
375:
215:
60:
293:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
222:
55:
371:
288:
130:
218:
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
348:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
126:
122:
118:
190:
354:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
447:). No further edits should be made to this page.
260:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
235:list of Management-related deletion discussions
387:Amendments have been made to the introduction
204:
8:
258:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
406:
257:
232:
314:amendments are required. Regards Carl
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
425:16:14, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
397:15:35, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
380:22:06, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
361:09:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
335:20:50, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
304:10:32, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
277:22:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
252:22:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
227:20:57, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
79:21:33, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
269:...........................
244:...........................
464:
436:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
214:Contested PROD. Fails
93:Design for Inspection
85:Design for Inspection
427:
413:Daniel McMahon 86
411:comment added by
363:
338:
321:comment added by
279:
254:
59:
56:non-admin closure
455:
438:
359:
353:
351:
349:
337:
315:
301:
296:
291:
268:
243:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
75:
69:
63:
53:
34:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:deletion review
434:
389:143.167.219.205
364:
355:
344:
342:
316:
299:
294:
289:
264:
239:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
73:
67:
61:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
450:
449:
429:
428:
399:
382:
352:
341:
340:
339:
307:
306:
281:
280:
255:
212:
211:
148:
87:
82:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
448:
446:
442:
437:
431:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
403:
400:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
365:
362:
358:
357:North America
350:
347:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:Carl Hitchens
320:
312:
309:
308:
305:
302:
297:
292:
286:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
261:
256:
253:
249:
245:
242:
236:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
217:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
86:
83:
81:
80:
76:
70:
64:
62:GeoffreyT2000
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
435:
432:
407:— Preceding
401:
384:
367:
343:
317:— Preceding
310:
284:
265:
240:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
216:WP:NOTGUIDE
178:free images
441:talk page
37:talk page
443:or in a
421:contribs
409:unsigned
372:Jergling
346:Relisted
331:contribs
319:unsigned
137:View log
74:contribs
39:or in a
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
266:1Wiki8
241:1Wiki8
219:JMHamo
156:Google
114:delete
262:. --
237:. --
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
417:talk
402:Keep
393:talk
385:Keep
376:talk
368:Keep
327:talk
311:Keep
285:Keep
273:talk
248:talk
223:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
68:talk
50:keep
295:ncr
206:TWL
135:– (
52:.
423:)
419:•
395:)
378:)
333:)
329:•
300:am
290:do
275:)
250:)
225:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
77:)
71:,
415:(
391:(
374:(
325:(
271:(
246:(
221:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
65:(
58:)
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.