279:, a peer-reviewed journal with respectable academics on its editorial board (elsevier.com/journals/personality-and-individual-differences/0191-8869/editorial-board) has published multiple articles (1985,2008,1995,2012,2013,2014,2016) on differential K theory. There are more sources that could be included too.
315:
The references in the current article (only one of which is by
Rushton), the additional references I listed above, etc. It seems that differential K theory has, since 1985 received "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". We could write an encyclopedia article
358:
is a mainstream journal, not a pay-to-publish scam. Rushton contributed a chapter on his closely related GFP theory to this handbook in 2011; a compendium of "the top global researchers within the area of individual differences" aiming to give "authoritative and engaging surveys of current
727:
not reliable because they have published
Rushton on this topic? I am quite willing to be convinced otherwise, but until I see some way to segregate, by policy, evidently reliable sources by some criteria other than a value judgment on their research I have to say
52:. There are differing opinions about whether the coverage of this (apparently fringe) theory is sufficient for an article, but the "keep" side has offered references that aren't substantially criticized here, so on balance I think this rather trends towards keep.
274:
from issues like whether it's debunked, fringe, correct, whether criticisms made of it are justified, etc, etc. Our job as editors is to determine whether there are enough reliable/notable sources to write an encyclopedia article on this subject, and there are.
169:
698:
While the theory is offensive it is unquestionably part of the academic discourse, even if only to refute it. Unfortunately we are not in a position to judge even some of the journals in the 'walled garden' as
200:
There is no significant coverage from outside the walled garden of racialist research publications except for a scant handful of criticisms. The criticism I see is not enough to justify an article.
652:
Figueredo, Aurelio José; Vásquez, Geneva; Brumbach, Barbara
Hagenah; Schneider, Stephanie M. R. (2004). "The heritability of life history strategy: The k‐factor, covitality, and personality".
559:
Figueredo, Aurelio José; Vásquez, Geneva; Brumbach, Barbara
Hagenah; Schneider, Stephanie M. R. (2004). "The heritability of life history strategy: The k‐factor, covitality, and personality".
163:
223:
122:
245:
484:
While there is an identifiable group of authors who write on this subject and a small set of journals which publish the majority of the papers, these are not the
129:
95:
90:
99:
82:
17:
466:
440:
184:
529:
Weizmann, Fredric; Wiener, Neil I.; Wiesenthal, David L.; Ziegler, Michael (1990). "Differential K theory and racial hierarchies".
151:
707:
while they are OK to cite for the positions which do not offend us? Do we have any reporting which brings the credentials of
270:
Differential K theory seems to easily pass
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines - of course saying that it's notable is
393:
819:
145:
40:
755:
354:
It's just not true that
Rushton's theories are ignored outside a "walled garden of racialist research publications".
337:
per nom. I'm not seeing the slightest evidence that this theory has any traction outside its little walled garden. --
800:
782:
759:
740:
371:
345:
325:
308:
288:
259:
237:
215:
64:
86:
141:
499:
Zack Z. Cernovsky (July 1995). "On the
Similarities of American Blacks and Whites: A Reply to J. P. Rushton".
191:
751:
254:
232:
209:
815:
778:
78:
70:
36:
607:
Voracek, Martin (2009). "Suicide Rates, National
Intelligence Estimates, and Differential K Theory".
750:
also per nom, but not I am not strong on what constitutes an academic discourse or a walled garden.
177:
157:
738:
683:
638:
590:
516:
413:
367:
321:
284:
676:
669:
631:
624:
583:
576:
546:
463:
437:
431:
249:
227:
202:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
814:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
457:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
774:
661:
616:
568:
538:
508:
405:
360:
342:
305:
769:
Note that differential K-theory is a notable topic in mathematics (see for instance, this
715:, both published by respectable scientific publishers, into question? Are journals like
409:
55:
797:
733:
488:
cases where it is referenced. Some examples, in addition to those already cited, are:
416:
363:
317:
280:
686:
641:
593:
519:
703:. How would we make that decision? Are the topics and theories which are offensive
665:
572:
298:
Differential K theory seems to easily pass
Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guidelines
116:
338:
301:
512:
620:
599:(This author has published many artilces on the subject, several with Rushton)
672:
627:
579:
549:
679:
634:
586:
359:
scholarship, and lucid and provocative synopses of contemporary debates".
542:
770:
808:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
796:
if the sources can be shown to be unreliable or non-notable. —
394:"Differential Use of Reproductive Strategies by Human Groups?"
361:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/book/10.1002/9781444343120
112:
108:
104:
721:
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research
176:
537:(1). American Psychological Association (APA): 1–13.
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
822:). No further edits should be made to this page.
244:Note: This discussion has been included in the
222:Note: This discussion has been included in the
224:list of Psychology-related deletion discussions
459:Criminological Perspectives on Race and Crime
8:
725:Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
246:list of Science-related deletion discussions
531:Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne
243:
221:
792:per Jbhunley, but willing to change to
384:
709:Personality and Individual Differences
356:Personality and Individual Differences
277:Personality and Individual Differences
773:) that is unrelated to this topic. --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
660:(3–4). Informa UK Limited: 121–143.
567:(3–4). Informa UK Limited: 121–143.
410:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00247.x
24:
615:(3). SAGE Publications: 733–736.
433:The General Factor of Personality
654:Biodemography and Social Biology
561:Biodemography and Social Biology
316:based on the takedowns alone!
1:
717:Behavioral and Brain Sciences
666:10.1080/19485565.2004.9989090
573:10.1080/19485565.2004.9989090
609:Perceptual and Motor Skills
456:Gabbidon, Shaun L. (2015).
839:
801:04:09, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
783:23:12, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
760:19:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
741:16:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
513:10.1177/002193479502500602
436:. Academic Press. p. 169.
372:02:26, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
346:01:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
326:02:25, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
309:01:45, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
300:Based on what, exactly? --
289:01:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
260:00:30, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
238:00:29, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
216:00:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
65:10:38, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
621:10.2466/pms.109.3.733-736
811:Please do not modify it.
501:Journal of Black Studies
32:Please do not modify it.
392:Mealey, Linda (1990).
272:completely independent
430:Musek, Janek (2017).
398:Psychological Science
211:Tell me all about it.
79:Differential K theory
71:Differential K theory
462:. Routledge. p. 40.
256:(there's a halo...)
234:(there's a halo...)
752:Prince of Thieves
691:
646:
601:
600:
554:
524:
262:
240:
212:
63:
830:
813:
736:
690:
649:
645:
604:
598:
597:
557:
553:
543:10.1037/h0078934
527:
523:
497:
473:
472:
453:
447:
446:
427:
421:
420:
389:
257:
252:
235:
230:
214:
210:
207:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
60:
53:
34:
838:
837:
833:
832:
831:
829:
828:
827:
826:
820:deletion review
809:
734:
651:
606:
558:
528:
498:
478:
477:
476:
469:
455:
454:
450:
443:
429:
428:
424:
391:
390:
386:
255:
250:
233:
228:
203:
201:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
836:
834:
825:
824:
804:
803:
786:
785:
763:
762:
744:
743:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
647:
602:
555:
525:
507:(6): 672–679.
490:
489:
475:
474:
467:
448:
441:
422:
404:(6): 385–387.
383:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
349:
348:
331:
330:
329:
328:
312:
311:
292:
291:
264:
263:
241:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
835:
823:
821:
817:
812:
806:
805:
802:
799:
795:
791:
788:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
768:
765:
764:
761:
757:
753:
749:
746:
745:
742:
739:
737:
731:
726:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
702:
697:
688:
685:
681:
678:
674:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
648:
643:
640:
636:
633:
629:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
603:
595:
592:
588:
585:
581:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
556:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
526:
521:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
487:
483:
480:
479:
470:
468:9781317575900
465:
461:
460:
452:
449:
444:
442:9780128112496
439:
435:
434:
426:
423:
418:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
388:
385:
381:
373:
369:
365:
362:
357:
353:
352:
351:
350:
347:
344:
340:
336:
333:
332:
327:
323:
319:
314:
313:
310:
307:
303:
299:
296:
295:
294:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
273:
269:
266:
265:
261:
258:
253:
251:Every morning
247:
242:
239:
236:
231:
229:Every morning
225:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
208:
206:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
810:
807:
793:
789:
766:
747:
729:
724:
720:
716:
713:Intelligence
712:
708:
704:
700:
657:
653:
612:
608:
564:
560:
534:
530:
504:
500:
485:
481:
458:
451:
432:
425:
401:
397:
387:
379:
355:
334:
297:
276:
271:
267:
205:ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants
204:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
57:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
775:Mark viking
164:free images
701:unreliable
380:References
58:Sandstein
816:talk page
673:1948-5565
628:0031-5125
580:1948-5565
550:1878-7304
417:143173481
37:talk page
818:or in a
798:Ashley Y
687:13911060
680:17019827
642:39724327
635:20178273
594:13911060
587:17019827
520:59065836
364:NPalgan2
318:NPalgan2
281:NPalgan2
123:View log
39:or in a
767:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
794:Delete
771:survey
748:Delete
705:not-RS
339:Calton
335:Delete
302:Calton
142:Google
100:delete
684:S2CID
639:S2CID
591:S2CID
517:S2CID
414:S2CID
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
790:Keep
779:talk
756:talk
730:Keep
723:and
711:and
677:PMID
670:ISSN
632:PMID
625:ISSN
584:PMID
577:ISSN
547:ISSN
486:only
482:Keep
464:ISBN
438:ISBN
368:talk
343:Talk
322:talk
306:Talk
285:talk
268:Keep
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
735:Jbh
662:doi
617:doi
613:109
569:doi
539:doi
509:doi
406:doi
192:TWL
121:– (
781:)
758:)
732:.
719:,
682:.
675:.
668:.
658:51
656:.
650:*
637:.
630:.
623:.
611:.
605:*
589:.
582:.
575:.
565:51
563:.
545:.
535:31
533:.
515:.
505:25
503:.
412:.
400:.
396:.
370:)
341:|
324:)
304:|
287:)
248:.
226:.
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
777:(
754:(
689:.
664::
644:.
619::
596:.
571::
552:.
541::
522:.
511::
471:.
445:.
419:.
408::
402:1
366:(
320:(
283:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.