Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Digon - Knowledge

Source 📝

594:
it should definitely not be merged into the lune article, as that's only one special case of a digon. There are two concepts here: the abstract concept of a digon, without regard to being embedded in any space, which needs its own standalone article, and one possible realization of a digon, embedded
258:
I am no longer completely sure about merging monogons and digons, as the latter are far more legitimate - they make sense as abstract polytopes. The monogon does not as it has two 1-sections that are not line segments. (It doesn't have any 1-polytopes as elements, for a 1-polytope must have two
535:
P.S. The digon has also been called the "bigon" in our culture's habitual mashing up of Latin prefixes with Greek suffixes. That has pretty much fallen out of use nowadays so we can truly say "let bigons be byegons" without fear of deletion. — Cheers,
503:. The two articles need to acknowledge each other, as their subjects overlap although they are distinct (not all digons are lunes, while treating the circular lune as an irregular digon would not be sensible). — Cheers, 288:- there is no mathematical literature devoted to the degeneracy of polygons, it is just a rag-bag of cases which get passing mention in the literature. For the same reason, wikipedia doesn't have articles on 173: 382:-- a moment's web searching confirms that "digon" is a term frequently used in the mathematical literature, with a specific meaning that is separate from some general conception of degenerate polygons. 126: 237: 431:
is a standard term in geometry for a line segment with multiplicity two. This way, one gets all cyclic groups as rotation symmetries of polygons. I've also seen
167: 565:, although you might also argue the spherical lune section be merged here, and focus the lune article on the 2D cases. Mathworld splits into 2 article 133: 312:
theory, etc. and its properties are discussed in sufficient depth in sufficient sources to establish its notability. — Cheers,
17: 259:
endpoints - a 0-sphere - and the single "edge" of the monogon has but one.) It seems like they may be better separated.
339:
an important geometric shape in non-euclidean geometries, and seemingly also in other fields I'm less familiar with. -
245: 188: 357: 344: 155: 625: 99: 94: 40: 399: 213: 103: 390:
into a single article in a way that did not improve the coverage of either. Accordingly, I have also rescued
225: 518: 468: 264: 241: 86: 293: 621: 541: 526: 508: 499:
The spherical lune is in fact an example of a regular digon: Coxeter provides a rock-solid reference in
368: 340: 317: 36: 149: 456:
Although, I am sorely tempted to vote delete, for the sake of using the pun: "Let digons be bygones."
285: 435:
used to refer to a lune of the sphere, but I think that is probably best kept completely separate.
600: 490: 415: 181: 145: 475: 395: 383: 301: 281: 221: 205: 604: 586: 545: 530: 512: 494: 452: 419: 372: 348: 321: 268: 249: 229: 68: 595:
within a spherical surface, which should be mentioned in both the digon and lune articles. --
582: 445: 309: 260: 209: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
620:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
195: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537: 522: 504: 332: 313: 289: 217: 562: 596: 486: 411: 54: 58: 578: 438: 305: 161: 570: 120: 90: 574: 220:
on September 6, 2015 to Degenerate polygon. It is now redundant to there.
566: 403: 391: 387: 296:
either. On the other hand the digon itself is most useful when it is
482: 407: 82: 74: 614:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
360:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
521:
is therefore misconceived and should be deleted. — Cheers,
116: 112: 108: 402:, where any specifics that are not already covered by 180: 366:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 284:article that should be AfD-ed. That article fails 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 628:). No further edits should be made to this page. 238:list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions 194: 8: 236:Note: This debate has been included in the 208:before it was moved on January 13, 2015 by 235: 561:- It might be merged and redirected into 467:yes, I've seen that too. I've created 7: 398:into a redirect to a subsection of 563:Lune_(geometry)#Spherical_geometry 24: 204:This article had the history of 331:for the reasons spelled out by 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 605:13:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC) 587:15:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 546:15:21, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 531:15:25, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 513:15:16, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 495:14:46, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 471:to deal with that, and added 453:14:39, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 420:14:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC) 373:13:38, 17 December 2015 (UTC) 349:03:27, 13 December 2015 (UTC) 322:11:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC) 269:07:35, 11 December 2015 (UTC) 250:04:25, 11 December 2015 (UTC) 230:23:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC) 69:16:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC) 573:, and a third "degenerate" 645: 617:Please do not modify it. 400:degeneracy (mathematics) 214:Improper regular polygon 32:Please do not modify it. 335:; a digon emphatically 300:degenerate, such as in 519:digon (disambiguation) 469:digon (disambiguation) 386:smushed this, and the 410:can be mentioned. -- 280:: It is actually the 294:degenerate elephants 55:(non-admin closure) 481:to the top of the 396:degenerate polygon 384:Degenerate polygon 302:spherical geometry 282:degenerate polygon 206:Degenerate polygon 501:Regular Polytopes 457: 451: 375: 310:abstract polytope 290:degenerate graphs 252: 242:Shawn in Montreal 57: 636: 619: 517:To add to that, 480: 474: 455: 450: 448: 436: 371: 365: 363: 361: 341:Bryanrutherford0 199: 198: 184: 136: 124: 106: 65: 62: 53: 34: 644: 643: 639: 638: 637: 635: 634: 633: 632: 626:deletion review 615: 478: 472: 446: 441: 437: 376: 367: 356: 354: 141: 132: 97: 81: 78: 63: 60: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 642: 640: 631: 630: 610: 609: 608: 607: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 533: 515: 459: 458: 444: 439: 422: 364: 353: 352: 351: 325: 324: 271: 253: 202: 201: 138: 77: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 641: 629: 627: 623: 618: 612: 611: 606: 602: 598: 593: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 571:SphericalLune 568: 564: 560: 556: 553: 547: 543: 539: 534: 532: 528: 524: 520: 516: 514: 510: 506: 502: 498: 497: 496: 492: 488: 484: 477: 470: 466: 463: 462: 461: 460: 454: 449: 443: 434: 430: 426: 423: 421: 417: 413: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 378: 377: 374: 370: 369:North America 362: 359: 350: 346: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286:WP:NOTABILITY 283: 279: 275: 272: 270: 266: 262: 257: 254: 251: 247: 243: 239: 234: 233: 232: 231: 227: 223: 222:GeoffreyT2000 219: 215: 211: 207: 197: 193: 190: 187: 183: 179: 175: 172: 169: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 147: 144: 143:Find sources: 139: 135: 131: 128: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 76: 73: 71: 70: 67: 66: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 616: 613: 591: 558: 554: 500: 485:article. -- 464: 432: 428: 424: 379: 355: 336: 328: 306:graph theory 297: 277: 273: 261:Double sharp 255: 216:and then by 210:Double sharp 203: 191: 185: 177: 170: 164: 158: 152: 142: 129: 59: 49: 47: 31: 28: 538:Steelpillow 523:Steelpillow 505:Steelpillow 394:, and made 380:Speedy keep 333:Steelpillow 329:Strong keep 314:Steelpillow 274:Strong keep 218:Steelpillow 168:free images 622:talk page 597:The Anome 487:The Anome 476:otheruses 465:Comment:' 412:The Anome 37:talk page 624:or in a 592:Comment: 579:Tom Ruen 358:Relisted 127:View log 39:or in a 442:ławomir 404:monogon 392:monogon 388:monogon 278:comment 256:Comment 174:WP refs 162:scholar 100:protect 95:history 276:- and 146:Google 104:delete 575:digon 559:Merge 483:digon 447:Biały 433:digon 429:Digon 408:digon 189:JSTOR 150:books 134:Stats 121:views 113:watch 109:links 83:Digon 75:Digon 16:< 601:talk 583:talk 569:and 567:Lune 555:Keep 542:Talk 527:Talk 509:Talk 491:talk 425:Keep 416:talk 345:talk 318:Talk 265:talk 246:talk 226:talk 182:FENS 156:news 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 64:5969 61:Onel 50:keep 557:or 427:. 406:or 298:not 292:or 212:to 196:TWL 125:– ( 52:. 603:) 585:) 577:. 544:) 529:) 511:) 493:) 479:}} 473:{{ 418:) 347:) 337:is 320:) 308:, 304:, 267:) 248:) 240:. 228:) 176:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 599:( 581:( 540:( 525:( 507:( 489:( 440:S 414:( 343:( 316:( 263:( 244:( 224:( 200:) 192:· 186:· 178:· 171:· 165:· 159:· 153:· 148:( 140:( 137:) 130:· 123:) 85:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
(non-admin closure)
Onel5969
16:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
Digon
Digon
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Degenerate polygon
Double sharp

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.