721:
31:
397:- Apparently the nomination seems to be based on personal vendetta and family feud. The person who has made this nomination has only focused on two articles only. On the other hand this article has been on Knowledge (XXG) for more than two years and fulfills the criteria of being the head of an International Agency. I recommend a Keep. --
491:, regardless of whether Marwat is correct in saying that this was nominated because of a vendetta, this article concerns a nonnotable person. Ultimately, it doesn't matter; if I nominate two articles about people in a group with each other, does that mean that I'm biassed against them? Even if it is meant to
671:
I sympathize with the nominator's apparent rare form of dyslexia that prevents them from reading the first line of an article, and print it here for him and any others afflicted with this condition, possibly a Cherry-picking work-related ailment. "Dil Jan Khan (Urdu: دل جان خان) (born April, 1934) is
701:
I laugh to hear the discussion. The
Administrator are requested to search through the official website of the Government of Pakistan i.e www.pakistan.gov.pk . Dil Jan has remained Federal Secretary Interior, SAFRON and Narcotics Control. This is the highest rank a civil servant can aspire to reach.
628:
that he never talks regarding the deletion or whatever the subject is, but always challenges the Users' authority to defend any of the
Articles that he wants to be here, wether of a Notable or obscure personality. In the end, is it fair to talk about users at Article for Deletions, rather debating
576:
by creating fake accounts, however, I don't believe in such absurdities. As an administrator it is your duty to keep an eye on such malicious elements. I would once gain repeat that what ever the result of this AFD, I would request to strike out all such fake votes and ban this user as well.
222:
The article doesn't meet the Wiki:Notability, as the rank is not anything but equal to
Additional Secretary / Secretary of British Bureaucracy. There are hundreds of Inspector Generals of Police in Pakistan. In any case it is not something which shouldn't be hinted. Recommended for
615:
tribe, to speak and have freedom of writing here. If I am uneligible to vote on the very first day - my aim for making this I.D is cleared above - then my vote be declared null and void. But I request you administrators to track the previous record (from 2006 to date) of this user
610:
is so confidant that I am Sock of other user who is much criticised for none. Now, when he has challenged my indetity, it is his moral duty to prove that I am using sock. Actually, he cannot see someone voting against him. He neverwants someone else than him, espcially from
516:
Although, a personal relative of mine, Dil Jan Khan, has never remained on a notableposition. The position he held in UN is totally a bureacuratic position, where usually Grade-21 (equvalient to Major
General) officers are inducted from member countries.
191:
441:
which was created by me. So before finalizing this AFD vote, his true biased intentions may also be kept in mind as he was yesterday confirmed to have a sock which was banned by another admin. Thanks. --
680:." Having had a job at the United Nations is a big deal worldwide, and establishes a degree of notability for this article. The notability of Dil Jan Khan's cop job is quite irrelevant in comparison.
353:- The discussion is being help open because the nomination was malformed. There was no proper header for the nomination making it difficult for other editors to see it in the list of nominations. --
602:
I not only respect your comments but of each individual here. I am surfing
Knowledge (XXG) since 2008, atleast once in fortnight. I recently created this I.D when it felt that being a native and
152:
429:- Whatever the result is but the closing Administrator/Editor is requested to kindly look at the history of the user who nominated this article as well as the other article on
651:
464:
Wether, I am a biased person or using sock, which i am not, still it wouldn't harm the wikipedia's policy regarding deletiong of this article. On one side, the ;": -->
185:
40:
245:- The AFD discussion header was missing causing it to be easily overlooked in going through the AFD lists. The duration of the AFD likely should be extended. --
472:
that both, me and RayofWisom has voted against each other. My intentions couldn't be guessed by anyone else, as it is God only and myself who knows my intentions
474:. But once again, wether I am a criminal or whatever, will it harm the policies of Knowledge (XXG) regarding this article? The article be deleted.--
313:
the page's editors must make a better case for the notability of the subject. How significant were the positions held? Where are RS covering him?
673:
543:
374:- I was unaware to create it, However, the Header created by you has even taken a time. But no problem, I can wait for a decission. --
17:
791:
738:
119:
114:
77:. Given that most of the participants here have been blocked as sockpuppets, it would be impossible to fairly judge consensus. –
753:
539:
123:
206:
106:
173:
773:
65:
46:
437:'s and that almost all of his edits are related to insertions of his family member names in the parent article on
772:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
569:
430:
167:
479:
470:
is accusing me of inserting the familuy fellows, while on the other he is accusing me to be RayofWisom. Note
379:
337:
232:
652:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Possibly ethnic-related disputes on
Pakistani issues
300:
86:
163:
758:
711:
689:
685:
663:
638:
587:
526:
508:
483:
451:
407:
383:
362:
341:
322:
302:
271:
267:
254:
236:
88:
732:
213:
751:
634:
535:
522:
199:
281:
707:
606:
myself, I must not keep quite on the issues relating to my tribe and its elder. I don't know how
492:
659:
573:
561:
504:
475:
375:
333:
293:
228:
110:
79:
58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
433:. The point is that both the articles relate to two gentlemen who belong to the same clan of
681:
629:
and addressing the issues? Is there no administrator to stop his such notorious writings? --
263:
496:
728:
179:
742:
630:
557:
531:
518:
358:
332:
Why the deletion is delayed, when there is no chance at all to prove his notability. --
250:
785:
703:
318:
655:
617:
607:
598:
579:
565:
564:
as this account was created only today and solely for voting on these two pages of
552:
500:
465:
443:
399:
102:
94:
140:
354:
246:
314:
499:
and delete it just as if this nomination were made by a neutral party.
621:
612:
603:
556:- I respect your opinion however, what would you say about a vote by
438:
434:
286:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
677:
766:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25:
147:
136:
132:
128:
198:
262:. Looks like a bureaucrat with a job. Not much else.
291:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –
212:
68:). No further edits should be made to this page.
776:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
45:For an explanation of the process, see
560:who appears as another sock puppet of
674:International Narcotics Control Board
620:to know his state of mind on article
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
41:deletion review on 2009 August 26
719:
29:
650:This AFD has been mentioned at
47:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1:
427:Note to Closing Admin/Editor
419:I don't know, how come you,
759:17:38, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
712:05:17, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
690:00:21, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
664:18:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
639:17:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
588:12:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
527:07:21, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
509:15:10, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
484:11:46, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
452:11:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
408:17:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
384:12:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
363:11:53, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
342:11:32, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
323:02:36, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
303:00:08, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
272:14:28, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
255:14:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
89:00:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
808:
237:20:05, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
718:This user is a checkuser
792:Pages at deletion review
769:Please do not modify it.
570:Abdul Majeed Khan Marwat
431:Abdul Majeed Khan Marwat
61:Please do not modify it.
672:a former President of
462:Note to Administrators
544:few or no other edits
546:outside this topic.
497:ignore that for now
73:The result was
547:
305:
53:
52:
39:was subject to a
799:
771:
749:
723:
722:
586:
584:
572:. I can counter
529:
450:
448:
421:
420:
406:
404:
296:
290:
288:
284:
217:
216:
202:
150:
144:
126:
82:
63:
33:
32:
26:
807:
806:
802:
801:
800:
798:
797:
796:
782:
781:
780:
774:deletion review
767:
756:
743:
720:
580:
578:
444:
442:
400:
398:
294:
282:
279:
225:Strong Deletion
159:
146:
117:
101:
98:
80:
66:deletion review
59:
37:This discussion
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
805:
803:
795:
794:
784:
783:
779:
778:
763:
762:
761:
754:
693:
692:
666:
644:
643:
642:
641:
591:
590:
548:
511:
486:
457:
455:
454:
423:
422:
411:
410:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
386:
366:
365:
345:
344:
325:
307:
306:
289:
276:
275:
274:
257:
220:
219:
156:
97:
92:
71:
70:
54:
51:
50:
44:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
804:
793:
790:
789:
787:
777:
775:
770:
764:
760:
757:
752:
750:
747:
740:
737:
734:
730:
726:
717:
716:
715:
713:
709:
705:
700:
695:
694:
691:
687:
683:
679:
675:
670:
667:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
646:
645:
640:
636:
632:
627:
626:It wonders me
623:
619:
614:
609:
605:
601:
600:
595:
594:
593:
592:
589:
585:
583:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
555:
554:
549:
545:
541:
537:
533:
528:
524:
520:
515:
512:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
469:
468:
463:
460:
459:
458:
453:
449:
447:
440:
436:
432:
428:
425:
424:
418:
417:
413:
412:
409:
405:
403:
396:
393:
392:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
369:
368:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
348:
347:
346:
343:
339:
335:
331:
330:
329:Strong Delete
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
308:
304:
301:
298:
297:
287:
285:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
243:Note to Admin
241:
240:
239:
238:
234:
230:
226:
215:
211:
208:
205:
201:
197:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
165:
162:
161:Find sources:
157:
154:
149:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
121:
116:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:
96:
93:
91:
90:
87:
84:
83:
76:
69:
67:
62:
56:
55:
48:
42:
38:
35:
28:
27:
19:
768:
765:
745:
735:
724:
698:
696:
668:
647:
625:
596:
581:
574:LineofWisdom
566:Dil Jan Khan
562:LineofWisdom
550:
513:
493:make a point
488:
476:LineofWisdom
471:
466:
461:
456:
445:
426:
415:
414:
401:
394:
376:LineofWisdom
371:
350:
334:LineofWisdom
328:
327:
310:
295:Juliancolton
292:
280:
259:
242:
229:LineofWisdom
224:
221:
209:
203:
195:
188:
182:
176:
170:
160:
103:Dil Jan Khan
95:Dil Jan Khan
81:Juliancolton
78:
75:no consensus
74:
72:
60:
57:
36:
682:Anarchangel
542:) has made
311:Weak delete
264:Niteshift36
186:free images
729:Rayofwisom
725:Confirmed
631:Marwat786
558:Marwat786
532:Marwat786
519:Marwat786
495:, we can
786:Category
739:contribs
727:sock of
704:Begukhan
597:Note to
551:Note to
540:contribs
372:Re-Reply
283:Relisted
153:View log
748:delanoy
669:Comment
656:Nyttend
648:Comment
618:Marwatt
608:Marwatt
599:Nyttend
582:MARWAT
553:Nyttend
501:Nyttend
467:MARWAT
446:MARWAT
402:MARWAT
192:WP refs
180:scholar
120:protect
115:history
622:Marwat
613:Marwat
604:Marwat
514:Delete
489:Delete
439:Marwat
435:Marwat
416:Delete
260:Delete
164:Google
148:delete
124:delete
678:UNODC
351:Reply
207:JSTOR
168:books
151:) – (
141:views
133:watch
129:links
16:<
755:adds
733:talk
708:talk
699:Keep
686:talk
660:talk
635:talk
568:and
536:talk
523:talk
505:talk
480:talk
395:Keep
380:talk
359:talk
355:Whpq
338:talk
319:talk
268:talk
251:talk
247:Whpq
233:talk
200:FENS
174:news
137:logs
111:talk
107:edit
741:).
676:of
654:.
315:JJL
214:TWL
788::
710:)
688:)
662:)
637:)
624:.
577:--
538:•
530:—
525:)
517:--
507:)
482:)
382:)
361:)
340:)
321:)
299:|
270:)
253:)
235:)
227:--
194:)
139:|
135:|
131:|
127:|
122:|
118:|
113:|
109:|
85:|
43:.
746:.
744:J
736:·
731:(
714:)
706:(
702:(
697:*
684:(
658:(
633:(
534:(
521:(
503:(
478:(
378:(
357:(
336:(
317:(
266:(
249:(
231:(
218:)
210:·
204:·
196:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
166:(
158:(
155:)
145:(
143:)
105:(
49:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.