279:. "Dinosaur Training" is fairly well known in strength training circles. I thought part of the goal of Knowledge (XXG) was to serve as a learning tool, but the standard here seems to be "non-notable, because I haven't heard of it". Does one have to be as well-known as Charles Atlas to merit an entry? And calling the book that cited Dinosaur Training non-notable seems rather weak; it was published by McGraw-Hill - not exactly self-published.
164:. Based on his user page and other contributions, I would be very surprised if Tjic were Brooks Kubik himself or even a close associate, and these contributions and his other contributions does not follow the typical pattern of the pitbull self-promoter who thinks he can use Knowledge (XXG) for free advertising or building website traffic. Furthermore, the
173:
201:
authors. Typing in "brooks kubik" (no d.) yields three different mentions by other writers. In other words, a handful of strength-training authors have mentioned his name in print. Tell you what: I'll change "weak keep" to something weaker. If someone kicks sand in my face I'll probably cave in altogether.
200:
I think I used the word "borderline." Here's yet another case of "borderline:" I'm not sure how to link this, but go to www.a9.com, select only "books", and type "brooks d. kubik" in quotations. You get the out-of-print book, the
Ironman book... and allusions to Kubik by two other strength-training
175:
gets 194 hits, borderline. I like Groups because it's less influenced by "search engine optimization" and other techniques for inflating web hits; under ordinary circumstances, Groups gets 1/4 to 1/10 the number of hit as a web search. On the face of it, when I read the content of the Group hits
306:
Section 6 for related articles. If you want to argue that one meets
Knowledge (XXG) notability criteria and one doesn't and that they should be split up, you're welcome to split them up. I was trying to save time, because Dinosaur Training should've been included in the Brooks Kubik AfD. --
148:
by Brooks Kubik. However, the fact that it appears in a print book by a legitimate publisher, under the auspices what I believe to be a legitimate physical-culture magazine, gives some credibility to its being a recognized concept. (By the way, a single hit
168:
as well as subsequent edits are completely free from promotional or hucksterish language. So, I don't see vanity, though I do see a question of how recognized and important this is in the muscle-building community. (To which I don't
381:
75:
49:
316:
OK, I have split the two. Saving time seems like a poor reason to combine them; Leistner and
Dinosaur Training aren't directly linked (Kubik and Dinosaur Training would've been a more reasonable pairing).
99:
248:
seems real enough but fairly marginal. If some heavily muscled individual calls to the door with a testimonial I will of course change my vote.
48:. This debate is evidently not a deleting one, even if I lob some sand at Dpbsmith. Some related comments can be found in my closure statement for
153:
is not negligible, though I'd rather see half-a-dozen to a dozen. For comparison, exact phrase "Charles Atlas" gets 1200 hits in 100 books).
17:
291:. Why was the AfD for Ken Leistner pointing here? Is this a package deal - Dinosaur Training and Leistner sink or swim together?
355:
133:
402:
36:
401:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
387:
372:
360:
341:
321:
311:
295:
283:
271:
240:
228:
208:
195:
183:
123:
82:
58:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
368:: This is a relevant form of training and has followers, it's part of old-time strength-training at least.
350:
176:
suggest that it is a real method, with some degree of real interest, but not very famous or well-known.
64:
263:
157:
94:
308:
205:
192:
191:. Ok, not vanity. But non-notable chapter in non-notable book doesn't add up to notability. --
180:
120:
79:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
333:, appears somewhat notable in the field. And how else are you going to get them to use the
303:
225:
144:
p. 215: "Dinosaur training is all about heavy poundages and working hard..." The chapter
249:
202:
177:
117:
369:
338:
318:
292:
280:
237:
53:
136:
gives five hits: three irrelevant, one inaccessible. However, the first hit is
334:
161:
384:
382:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brooks Kubik (second nomination)
76:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brooks Kubik (second nomination)
50:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brooks Kubik (second nomination)
395:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
88:
I am also nominating the following related page because of NN:
165:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
100:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Ken Leistner
405:). No further edits should be made to this page.
140:Ironman's Ultimate Guide To Building Muscle Mass
8:
142:. McGraw-Hill Professional. ISBN 0809228130.
302:The AfD for Leistner was pointing here per
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
380:as per my reasoning and comments in
132:Google Books search on exact phrase
224:per nom for lack of notability. --
24:
156:Re vanity: both this article and
111:Puny, weakling, skinny-scarecrow
1:
44:The result of the debate was
422:
138:Ironman Magazine (2000).
398:Please do not modify it.
388:02:13, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
373:21:31, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
361:20:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
342:16:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
322:02:32, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
312:01:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
296:00:22, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
284:00:21, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
272:20:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
241:13:35, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
229:19:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
209:13:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
196:13:08, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
184:12:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
124:12:59, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
83:11:52, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
59:20:50, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
172:Hmmm... Google Groups
116:. Comments follow:
134:"dinosaur training"
166:original Tjic text
359:
115:
65:Dinosaur Training
57:
413:
400:
353:
269:
266:
261:
258:
255:
252:
160:were created by
143:
113:
56:
34:
421:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
411:
410:
409:
403:deletion review
396:
339:Smerdis of Tlön
267:
264:
259:
256:
253:
250:
151:in Google Books
137:
72:probable vanity
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
419:
417:
408:
407:
391:
390:
375:
363:
351:badlydrawnjeff
344:
327:
326:
325:
324:
299:
298:
286:
274:
243:
231:
218:
217:
216:
215:
214:
213:
212:
211:
170:
154:
127:
126:
103:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
418:
406:
404:
399:
393:
392:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:
374:
371:
367:
364:
362:
357:
352:
349:per above. --
348:
345:
343:
340:
336:
332:
329:
328:
323:
320:
315:
314:
313:
310:
305:
301:
300:
297:
294:
290:
287:
285:
282:
278:
275:
273:
270:
262:
247:
244:
242:
239:
235:
232:
230:
227:
223:
220:
219:
210:
207:
204:
199:
198:
197:
194:
190:
187:
186:
185:
182:
179:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
147:
141:
135:
131:
130:
129:
128:
125:
122:
119:
112:
109:
108:
104:
101:
97:
96:
92:
91:
90:
89:
85:
84:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
397:
394:
377:
365:
346:
330:
288:
276:
245:
233:
221:
188:
158:Brooks Kubik
150:
145:
139:
110:
106:
105:
95:Ken Leistner
93:
87:
86:
71:
69:
46:NO CONSENSUS
45:
43:
31:
28:
74:; see also
335:litter box
226:Kicking222
107:Weak keep.
356:WP:MEMES?
331:Weak keep
236:per nom.
162:User:Tjic
98:See also
203:Dpbsmith
178:Dpbsmith
169:belong).
118:Dpbsmith
289:Comment
189:Comment
378:Delete
370:Tyciol
319:Dsreyn
309:FRCP11
304:WP:AFD
293:Dsreyn
281:Dsreyn
246:Delete
238:Dr Zak
234:Delete
222:Delete
206:(talk)
193:FRCP11
181:(talk)
121:(talk)
80:FRCP11
54:Splash
16:<
366:Keep
347:Keep
277:Keep
114:keep
70:NN,
385:MCB
260:493
78:--
52:. -
337:?
268:lk
265:Ta
257:ns
254:yo
251:Dl
146:is
358:)
354:(
102:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.