467:
of the plot already covered at the main
Dragonlance article. Which sources about the franchise belong at the main article and which sources belong here? The answer is the exact same sources, indicating we shouldn't have two articles about the same thing here. And this article should be the one to go,
80:
178:
291:
134:
75:
265:
172:
107:
102:
111:
94:
481:
455:
422:
397:
382:
362:
341:
324:
306:
280:
254:
59:
354:
333:
17:
193:
160:
496:
36:
154:
451:
150:
495:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
98:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
464:
477:
358:
337:
200:
435:
210:
139:
371:
90:
65:
473:
447:
214:
186:
166:
394:
316:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
238:
302:
276:
250:
469:
443:
431:
242:
230:
226:
320:
463:
because this is not just a matter of finding the right sources. The problem is this is a
55:
439:
222:
218:
418:
391:
379:
378:
of about the same length, I don't think it's necessary to merge anything anymore. –
128:
405:- most of article is sourced, even if to primary sources. Would otherwise rather
410:
375:
350:
298:
272:
246:
413:
than delete, as any independent sources found in the future could be added.
50:
414:
370:
per nom. I really don't know what one would merge to ] except maybe
468:
since it's exclusively about the plot, which is what wikipedia is
489:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
81:
Articles for deletion/Dragonlance timeline (2nd nomination)
292:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
124:
120:
116:
185:
199:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
499:). No further edits should be made to this page.
266:list of Literature-related deletion discussions
349:a summary of this page should be merged into
217:with no secondary sources. There are also no
8:
231:manual of style for fiction-related subjects
286:
260:
76:Articles for deletion/Dragonlance timeline
290:: This debate has been included in the
264:: This debate has been included in the
73:
372:Dragonlance timeline#Age of Starbirth
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
213:, it's referenced exclusively with
72:
24:
225:. The article does not meet the
241:. I believe that it falls into
209:The article is written with an
1:
456:09:50, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
423:17:53, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
398:20:42, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
383:08:38, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
376:Dragonlance#Fictional history
374:, but since there already is
363:06:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
342:06:03, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
325:02:24, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
307:01:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
281:01:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
255:01:49, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
482:17:23, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
227:general notability guideline
60:04:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
516:
492:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
436:"no in-universe" policy
211:in-universe perspective
434:article violating the
71:AfDs for this article:
239:real-world notability
243:reasons for deletion
233:, being an unneeded
91:Dragonlance timeline
66:Dragonlance timeline
440:third-party sources
332:to annex.wikia.com
219:third-party sources
390:to the Annex. ----
44:The result was
309:
295:
283:
269:
507:
494:
430:per nomination.
315:per nomination.
296:
270:
204:
203:
189:
142:
132:
114:
34:
515:
514:
510:
509:
508:
506:
505:
504:
503:
497:deletion review
490:
448:Folken de Fanel
438:, there are no
215:primary sources
146:
138:
105:
89:
86:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
513:
511:
502:
501:
485:
484:
465:WP:CONTENTFORK
458:
425:
400:
395:is not British
385:
365:
344:
327:
310:
284:
207:
206:
143:
140:Afd statistics
85:
84:
83:
78:
70:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
512:
500:
498:
493:
487:
486:
483:
479:
475:
474:Shooterwalker
471:
466:
462:
459:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:Strong delete
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
401:
399:
396:
393:
389:
386:
384:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
355:76.66.194.212
352:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
334:76.66.194.212
331:
328:
326:
322:
318:
314:
311:
308:
304:
300:
293:
289:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
202:
198:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
152:
149:
148:Find sources:
144:
141:
136:
130:
126:
122:
118:
113:
109:
104:
100:
96:
92:
88:
87:
82:
79:
77:
74:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
491:
488:
460:
442:and thus no
427:
406:
402:
387:
367:
346:
329:
312:
287:
261:
235:content fork
208:
196:
190:
182:
175:
169:
163:
157:
147:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
411:Dragonlance
351:Dragonlance
173:free images
444:notability
223:notability
221:to verify
432:plot-only
388:Transwiki
330:Transwiki
407:redirect
392:Divebomb
380:sgeureka
237:with no
135:View log
347:Comment
229:or the
179:WP refs
167:scholar
108:protect
103:history
470:WP:NOT
461:Delete
368:Delete
313:Delete
299:Jfgslo
273:Jfgslo
247:Jfgslo
151:Google
112:delete
46:delete
317:Bob A
194:JSTOR
155:books
137:) •
129:views
121:watch
117:links
48:. --
16:<
478:talk
452:talk
419:talk
403:Keep
359:talk
338:talk
321:talk
303:talk
288:Note
277:talk
262:Note
251:talk
187:FENS
161:news
125:logs
99:talk
95:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
415:BOZ
409:to
201:TWL
133:– (
480:)
472:.
454:)
421:)
361:)
353:.
340:)
323:)
305:)
294:.
279:)
268:.
253:)
245:.
181:)
127:|
123:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
58:)
476:(
450:(
446:.
417:(
357:(
336:(
319:(
301:(
297:—
275:(
271:—
249:(
205:)
197:·
191:·
183:·
176:·
170:·
164:·
158:·
153:(
145:(
131:)
93:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.