510:
wouldn't be able to comprehend what's written. How can thoughtless users on
Knowledge (XXG) try and stopper the fledgling, blossoming minds of a few young adults? It's just not right. Especially when the article, which supposedly "must be destroyed immeadiately" pledges no harm towards the website. In fact, it probably helps people to learn more about Nate Rosen. You guys are digging your own graves.. *
366:. "...much to the excitement of every male on planet earth." How come I wasn't excited - or even told? Also notice the lack of apostrophes and other tiny (but big) grammar errors. I find it hard to believe the person who wrote this article passed English class, let alone a book that is supposedly the world's best selling book ever.
509:
Nice metaphorical language, but it really doesn't have any use in a forum like this. But that's ok, you can do what you like. Anyways,while a true editor might correct every error in a writer's piece of work, that writer doesn't care at all what's wrong or right, because either way, only an idiot
549:
sources, it remains unnotable from the point of view of wikipedia's criteria - this is not to belittle the work of the young adults working on it, this is just the policy followed here. My suggestion is to keep working on it, get it published, get into the NY Times (or London Times, or other
482:
You are digging the article's grave right now by making more outlandish claims. These claims (plus the grammar mistakes you keep making that no self-respecting writer would ever make) only reinforce the fact that this book exists only in the minds of a few bored teenagers.
225:
some claims of notability. However, if true these claims would make the book one of the best-selling of all time and the author one of the richest people on the planet. The "picture" of the book included at the top of the article is taken from the
615:
The authors are attempting to ciculate the rough draft among the book for peer review throughout their high school. Knowledge (XXG), I'm sure, would be more than willing to allow the passage of information for scholarly
596:(as demonstrated by the "blossoming minds" quote). Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for developing the "fledgling, blossoming minds of a few young adults". There are plenty of forums and blogs out there for that.
537:. Perhaps in the future, this will become a world-wide highly regarded, important piece of work, but at the moment it is not notable, and by that criteria, an article about it does not belong on Knowledge (XXG).
221:
as either made up or utterly non-notable. No sources cited and there isn't a single mention of this book on Google. In a belated attempt to claim some sort of notability, a user has
309:
Nate Rosen is a character in a series of novels by Ronald
Levitsky - who doesn't have an entry on here - and all the other references to Nate Rosen are on non-reliable sites. --
120:
202:. We can't keep the article on the simple basis that "it could become important". If it becomes relevant in the future, which I doubt, then the article can be recreated.
545:- there are more appropriate places for this, such as blogs and the like. While the book is unpublished, and obviously has not received reviews and commentary from
263:
I reverted the edits that claimed that the book is widely popular (over 1 billion sold copies) because they are vandalism and obvious misinformation.
166:, the article does not appear to be for vanity, but rather appears as an ongoing project that could perhaps produce relevant information in the future
646:
it would be eligible for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG), but I would say that at the moment it does not meet the criteria required for inclusion. --
425:
Yo, you guys need to chill out. This is a valid book. I think you guy's are just jealous of Nate Rosen's ability to pick up chicks. - Ben Pollay
230:
article, as shown by the fact that the book in the picture is written in German. This book has no claim to a
Knowledge (XXG) article whatsoever.
428:
i agree, i mean what is up with this? just because you haven't heard of it doesn't mean its not incredibly popular in sebastopol - Nathaniel
87:
82:
624:
516:
177:
91:
444:
664:
572:
327:
300:
74:
17:
541:
are not trying to stop the blossoming minds of anyone - however, we have criteria for inclusion on wikipedia which do not include
687:
36:
686:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
670:
632:
628:
605:
578:
524:
496:
471:
448:
419:
396:
375:
358:
333:
272:
257:
238:
211:
185:
181:
158:
140:
56:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
440:
392:
78:
620:
432:
173:
658:
566:
321:
294:
520:
436:
154:
546:
484:
459:
70:
62:
643:
642:
Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for such things - when (or if) it becomes notable according to the
534:
533:: The question isn't whether the article is harming Knowledge (XXG) - the question is whether it is
199:
593:
384:
342:
601:
467:
388:
268:
253:
207:
136:
648:
556:
492:
415:
371:
311:
284:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
550:
world-reknown paper or website) best seller list - then no one will say it is not notable...
407:
150:
345:. Possible G3 speedy. (When I first saw the title, I assumed it had something to do with a
195:
128:
354:
589:
597:
463:
264:
249:
203:
132:
488:
411:
367:
232:
49:
108:
350:
406:
in the strongest possible strong terms strongly expressed. Clearly a
244:
I've changed my mind. Now it's a blatant hoax, so it is eligible for
282:- No such book seems to be mentioned anywhere but on wikipedia. --
346:
680:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
149:, book doesn't appear to exist. Essentially a vanity article. --
222:
115:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
690:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
543:"Allowing blossoming minds to have a forum"
458:You are joking, right? Don't do that. See
644:Knowledge (XXG) guidelines for notability
515:-- preceding unsigned comment left by
364:"You have got to be kidding me" Delete
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
198:. Also, Knowledge (XXG) is not a
539:Thoughtless users on wikipedia
1:
588:. No point dragging this on.
305:) 13:23, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
707:
671:21:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
633:21:26, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
57:23:43, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
606:22:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
579:20:11, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
552:but it is not notable yet
525:19:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
497:14:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
472:08:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
449:05:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
420:13:56, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
397:13:31, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
376:13:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
359:13:26, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
334:13:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
273:13:24, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
258:11:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
239:11:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
212:10:38, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
186:10:18, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
159:09:43, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
141:09:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
683:Please do not modify it.
127:Non notable book, fails
32:Please do not modify it.
194:Comment appears to be
507:Digging a grave, huh?
512:Please, give it up
485:Please, give it up
44:The result was
623:comment added by
527:
452:
435:comment added by
383:. I agree on the
176:comment added by
71:Dreams of a Playa
63:Dreams of a Playa
698:
685:
667:
661:
654:
651:
635:
575:
569:
562:
559:
554:. Thank you. --
514:
451:
429:
330:
324:
317:
314:
303:
297:
290:
287:
188:
118:
112:
94:
54:
34:
706:
705:
701:
700:
699:
697:
696:
695:
694:
688:deletion review
681:
665:
659:
652:
649:
618:
573:
567:
560:
557:
430:
328:
322:
315:
312:
301:
295:
288:
285:
246:Speedy deletion
171:
114:
85:
69:
66:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
704:
702:
693:
692:
676:
675:
674:
673:
625:67.160.244.200
609:
608:
583:
582:
581:
517:67.160.244.200
502:
501:
500:
499:
477:
476:
475:
474:
423:
422:
400:
399:
378:
361:
336:
277:
276:
275:
241:
216:
215:
214:
178:67.160.244.200
168:
167:
161:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
703:
691:
689:
684:
678:
677:
672:
668:
662:
656:
655:
645:
641:
638:
637:
636:
634:
630:
626:
622:
614:
611:
610:
607:
603:
599:
595:
591:
587:
584:
580:
576:
570:
564:
563:
553:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
529:
528:
526:
522:
518:
513:
508:
504:
503:
498:
494:
490:
486:
481:
480:
479:
478:
473:
469:
465:
461:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:Nathanielman7
434:
426:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:Strong delete
402:
401:
398:
395:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
335:
331:
325:
319:
318:
308:
304:
298:
292:
291:
281:
280:Strong Delete
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
242:
240:
237:
236:
235:
229:
224:
220:
219:Strong delete
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
187:
183:
179:
175:
165:
162:
160:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
682:
679:
647:
639:
617:
612:
585:
555:
551:
542:
538:
530:
511:
506:
427:
424:
403:
391:
380:
363:
338:
310:
306:
283:
279:
245:
243:
233:
231:
218:
200:crystal ball
169:
164:Non Deletion
163:
146:
126:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
666:My Contribs
619:—Preceding
586:Snow delete
574:My Contribs
460:WP:SNOWBALL
431:—Preceding
329:My Contribs
302:My Contribs
172:—Preceding
151:Bongwarrior
660:Contact Me
568:Contact Me
323:Contact Me
307:postscript
296:Contact Me
594:WP:MADEUP
385:speedy G3
343:WP:MADEUP
621:unsigned
598:Tim Song
547:reliable
464:Kotiwalo
445:contribs
433:unsigned
347:dry lake
265:Kotiwalo
250:Kotiwalo
204:Kotiwalo
174:unsigned
133:Kotiwalo
121:View log
650:Phantom
640:Comment
558:Phantom
535:notable
531:Comment
489:Xenon54
412:ukexpat
408:WP:HOAX
389:Quantum
381:Destroy
368:Xenon54
313:Phantom
286:Phantom
234:Hut 8.5
88:protect
83:history
52:JForget
616:review
393:Eleven
339:Delete
196:WP:SPA
147:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
46:delete
653:Steve
561:Steve
316:Steve
289:Steve
223:added
129:WP:BK
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
629:talk
613:But
602:talk
590:WP:N
521:talk
493:talk
468:talk
441:talk
416:talk
387:. —
372:talk
355:talk
351:Deor
269:talk
254:talk
228:book
208:talk
182:talk
155:talk
137:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
349:.)
170:.
669:)
663:,
631:)
604:)
592:,
577:)
571:,
523:)
495:)
487:.
470:)
462:.
447:)
443:•
418:)
410:.
374:)
357:)
341:.
332:)
326:,
299:,
271:)
256:)
248:.
210:)
184:)
157:)
139:)
131:.
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
657:(
627:(
600:(
565:(
519:(
505:"
491:(
466:(
439:(
414:(
370:(
353:(
320:(
293:(
267:(
252:(
206:(
180:(
153:(
135:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.