Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Dribnif - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

432:. Dear 70.235.19.172, what is annoying is not the article itself: it just doesn't fit into Knowledge (XXG), first of all because it is a dictionary entry and Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary and then because it is not possible to prove its relevance. What is annoying is the fact that you come in all guns blazing, trying to use misplaced irony and sterile arguments to prevent the article from being deleted - and you do so anonymously. Good arguments would be sources (printed or - even better because easier to verify - online) that state that the word "Dribnif" (which I indeed find funny and would use but for the life of me I can't remember unless I read it less than 30 seconds before, but this is not the point) is commonly used and widely recognised. And this still wouldn't justify its inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) but only in a dictionary. Sorry. 395:
If you find persons that are honestly trying to increse your knowledge base annoying, then so be it. The term is real and honest and you and anyone else that ever drops an ice cube will be just have to pick it up and face your censorship. I won't annoy you anymore and I am sorry if that was the
306:. Dear author of an unsigned comment (and therefore normally unworthy of a reply but I'm in a good mood), even if this made-up word was used by any relevant group of people, try to add it to a dictionary, not an encyclopedia. 157: 299:
If you delete the term Dribnif you might as well stop allowing people to increase your knowledge base. What would you call a Dribnif if we had not told you the first term used to describe the subject?
409:
The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) is verifiability, not truth—that is, whether readers are able to check that material added to Knowledge (XXG) has already been published by a
118: 151: 268:. Made-up neologism probably only used only by the person who invented it and maybe his circle of friends and family members. Totally unjustified article. 249:, which the term "Dribnif" seems to be. This is a new, short article with no sources given, and, based on my search on Google, no potential sources. 17: 403:- Knowledge (XXG)'s idea of "knowledge" is not just "something someone says is real and honest." Our fundamental principle is 334:
Usage in permanently recorded media, conveying meaning, in at least three independent instances spanning at least a year.
481: 454: 36: 254: 172: 85: 80: 139: 89: 404: 480:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
72: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
250: 324:...and even then, if it's a good dictionary, it will not be any more interested than we are in something 133: 462: 286: 410: 353:. ...that's why I wrote "try" to add it to a dictionary. So at least he goes to annoy someone else! 129: 385: 165: 49: 466: 441: 424: 389: 362: 345: 315: 293: 277: 258: 246: 233: 203: 76: 54: 437: 358: 311: 273: 179: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
68: 60: 458: 420: 341: 229: 450: 325: 217: 213: 191: 242: 381: 377: 221: 188: 433: 354: 307: 269: 199: 145: 106: 416: 337: 225: 329: 195: 48:
with prejudice against recreation before the heat death of the universe.
474:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
113: 102: 98: 94: 164: 178: 396:effect. Thanks for your consideration regardless. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 484:). No further edits should be made to this page. 247:Knowledge (XXG) is not for ideas made up one day 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 413:, not whether we think it is true. 24: 1: 467:14:25, 1 September 2009 (UTC) 55:12:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 442:08:05, 28 August 2009 (UTC) 425:20:19, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 390:22:46, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 363:08:03, 27 August 2009 (UTC) 346:19:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 316:18:51, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 294:11:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 278:09:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 259:09:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 234:09:19, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 204:09:12, 26 August 2009 (UTC) 501: 332:requires attestation by " 477:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 328:; our sister project 455:WP:YOUREKIDDINGRIGHT 245:, and the fact that 241:per reasons above, 457:, take your pick. 44:The result was 251:Rising*From*Ashes 243:original research 492: 479: 291: 183: 182: 168: 116: 110: 92: 52: 34: 500: 499: 495: 494: 493: 491: 490: 489: 488: 482:deletion review 475: 411:reliable source 326:made up one day 287: 125: 112: 83: 67: 64: 50: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 498: 496: 487: 486: 470: 469: 444: 427: 393: 392: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 319: 318: 297: 296: 280: 262: 261: 236: 186: 185: 122: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 497: 485: 483: 478: 472: 471: 468: 464: 460: 456: 452: 448: 445: 443: 439: 435: 431: 428: 426: 422: 418: 414: 412: 406: 405:Verifiability 402: 399: 398: 397: 391: 387: 383: 379: 375: 372: 371: 364: 360: 356: 352: 349: 348: 347: 343: 339: 335: 331: 327: 323: 322: 321: 320: 317: 313: 309: 305: 302: 301: 300: 295: 292: 290: 284: 281: 279: 275: 271: 267: 266:Speedy Delete 264: 263: 260: 256: 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 235: 231: 227: 223: 219: 215: 211: 208: 207: 206: 205: 201: 197: 193: 190: 181: 177: 174: 171: 167: 163: 159: 156: 153: 150: 147: 144: 141: 138: 135: 131: 128: 127:Find sources: 123: 120: 115: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 476: 473: 446: 429: 408: 400: 394: 373: 350: 333: 303: 298: 288: 282: 265: 238: 209: 187: 175: 169: 161: 154: 148: 142: 136: 126: 45: 43: 31: 28: 459:Niteshift36 152:free images 330:Wiktionary 289:Francium12 189:Unverified 51:Skomorokh 382:Joe Chill 192:neologism 434:McMarcoP 376:: Fails 355:McMarcoP 308:McMarcoP 285:per nom 270:McMarcoP 119:View log 430:Comment 401:Comment 351:Comment 304:Comment 158:WP refs 146:scholar 86:protect 81:history 69:Dribnif 61:Dribnif 451:WP:NEO 447:Delete 417:JohnCD 374:Delete 338:JohnCD 283:Delete 239:Delete 226:JohnCD 218:WP:NAD 214:WP:NEO 210:Delete 130:Google 114:delete 90:delete 46:delete 173:JSTOR 134:books 117:) – ( 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 463:talk 449:per 438:talk 421:talk 386:talk 378:WP:N 359:talk 342:talk 312:talk 274:talk 255:talk 230:talk 222:WP:V 212:per 200:talk 166:FENS 140:news 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 453:or 407:: " 196:I42 180:TWL 465:) 440:) 423:) 415:" 388:) 380:. 361:) 344:) 336:" 314:) 276:) 257:) 232:) 224:. 220:, 216:, 202:) 194:. 160:) 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 461:( 436:( 419:( 384:( 357:( 340:( 310:( 272:( 253:( 228:( 198:( 184:) 176:· 170:· 162:· 155:· 149:· 143:· 137:· 132:( 124:( 121:) 111:( 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Skomorokh 
12:43, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Dribnif
Dribnif
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
Unverified
neologism
I42
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.