435:- This was a learning curve for me, and this experience will aid me with my future editing on Knowledge (XXG). Thank you for bringing those issues to light. My reasoning for beginning this AfD was an err on my part, although the catalyst came from a fourth party query pertaining to a question I had about the chronology. The editor that advised me is a seasoned editor, but is not an administrator. I would also like to add that
454:; this is merely an arbitrary debate about a subject that the two of us were at odds. I would like to thank you for your third-party input and patience in this matter. It is definitely appreciated. I'm glad that there is resolution with this article. I still think that article should be expanded, but I'm in agreement that the article should remain on the site. --
479:"Closing discussions in which you have offered an opinion or for a page that you have edited heavily presents a conflict of interest and should be avoided. The sole exception is if you are closing your own withdrawn nomination as a speedy keep and all other viewpoints expressed were for keep as well."
449:
are two usernames for the same creator and editor of the article in question. As a "friendly ruse," the editor decided to change his username. I happen to know this particular editor outside of the
Knowledge (XXG) forum and we've come to mutual agreements about the subject matter in question. This
249:
There really is no reason for this page to be deleted. The CD mentioned is a rare occassion of two artists of completely different backgrounds joining to record an album. Plus, this CD will eventually become a rare collector's item (it already hasn't yet) and this article can help the casual reader
152:
notability guidelines and has no possibility for expansion. It doesn't meet the album criteria; the album only contains a track listing and a brief informational blurb at the top of the article. There is little or no record of charted singles or publication coverage of any kind other than the
228:- If it were to be kept, there should be more to it than just a small piece on the CBS channel. I'm a fan of the disc and I do own it, but I really wish there were more of a way to expand the article to encompass more than what is presently listed.--
326:, and "little or no ... publication coverage of any kind other than the artist's websites" is false: an article confirming that the album had been featured on national television in the US was published a month ago and easy to find.
274:- As I mentioned in the previous reply to the editor above: I wish that the article had more information to expand on instead of a track listing and a simple blurb with a citation to a small online article. --
92:
87:
96:
322:"little fanfare and sales promotion" (marketing strategy and tactics are irrelevant) "not released on a major label" (many notable albums aren't) "not RIAA certified gold or platinum" (ditto),
79:
125:
83:
250:
learn a little bit about this album instead of just seeing a simple mention of the album with no explaination of any songs on the album or whatever. Definately a
75:
67:
496:
463:
427:
375:
283:
262:
237:
216:
188:
166:
60:
153:
artist's websites. I've made an effort to try and find a way to expand this article, which proved futile. After seeking information from the
304:
17:
144:) created this disc with little fanfare and sales promotion behind it. It was not released on a major label and the sales were not
331:
I had never heard of the album or the artists before a dispute about whether or not to include the artists' album chronologies in
393:
357:
482:
346:
518:
36:
350:
342:
313:: "viable candidate for this type of nomination" means suitable for open discussion, not foredoomed to deletion).
517:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
51:- The article contains enough information to meet Knowledge (XXG) standards. Therefore, it should be kept. --
459:
279:
233:
176:
162:
56:
335:
154:
439:
323:
258:
493:
446:
424:
387:
372:
213:
455:
275:
229:
158:
52:
149:
361:
184:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
141:
157:, I was advised that this article would be a viable candidate for this type of nomination.
436:
254:
490:
443:
421:
383:
369:
210:
205:
400:
410:
307:. An AfD nominator is simply one who lists it, not the gatekeeper of the process (
180:
137:
113:
476:
Alrighty then. Apparently the next step for you is to withdraw the nomination:
201:
483:
Knowledge (XXG):Deletion process#Non-administrators closing discussions
303:, on whether or not its inclusion is supported by this encyclopedia's
301:
particularly from editors who haven't previously edited the article
511:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
145:
360:, found the CBS piece, which did, and added the reference with
148:
certified gold or platinum. This article does not meet
417:
365:
120:
109:
105:
101:
299:
The point of a
Knowledge (XXG) AfD is to draw input,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
521:). No further edits should be made to this page.
382:As the nominator did not notify article creator
8:
136:- I would like to open with the fact that
76:Duo (Richard Marx and Matt Scannell album)
68:Duo (Richard Marx and Matt Scannell album)
358:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (music)#Albums
396:) of this discussion as recommended in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
318:Specific claims in the nomination,
24:
293:Additional comments by Athaenara:
140:and Matt Scannell (from the band
497:23:00, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
464:14:22, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
428:07:31, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
376:07:11, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
284:05:32, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
263:05:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
238:05:02, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
217:04:52, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
189:13:14, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
167:20:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
61:01:16, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
1:
406:, I notified him myself with
345:. I looked for independent
209:as cited in the article. —
489:(And you're welcome :-) —
538:
155:Knowledge (XXG):Help desk
514:Please do not modify it.
175:This AfD nomination was
32:Please do not modify it.
305:policies and guidelines
488:
477:
179:. It is listed now.
49:Nominator Withdrawl
44:The result was
529:
516:
415:
409:
405:
399:
347:reliable sources
340:
334:
324:beg the question
142:Vertical Horizon
123:
117:
99:
34:
537:
536:
532:
531:
530:
528:
527:
526:
525:
519:deletion review
512:
413:
407:
403:
397:
338:
332:
119:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
535:
533:
524:
523:
506:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
469:
468:
467:
466:
379:
378:
341:was listed on
328:
327:
315:
314:
296:
295:
289:
288:
287:
286:
266:
265:
243:
242:
241:
240:
220:
219:
206:The Early Show
194:
193:
192:
191:
170:
169:
130:
129:
70:
65:
64:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
534:
522:
520:
515:
509:
508:
507:
498:
495:
492:
487:
486:
484:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
465:
461:
457:
456:Candy156sweet
453:
448:
445:
441:
438:
434:
431:
430:
429:
426:
423:
419:
412:
402:
395:
392:
389:
385:
381:
380:
377:
374:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:Third opinion
337:
336:Infobox Album
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
312:
311:
306:
302:
298:
297:
294:
291:
290:
285:
281:
277:
276:Candy156sweet
273:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
260:
256:
253:
248:
245:
244:
239:
235:
231:
230:Candy156sweet
227:
224:
223:
222:
221:
218:
215:
212:
208:
207:
203:
199:
196:
195:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
173:
172:
171:
168:
164:
160:
159:Candy156sweet
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
132:
131:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
62:
58:
54:
53:Candy156sweet
50:
47:
46:
45:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
513:
510:
505:
480:
478:
451:
432:
390:
354:
319:
309:
308:
300:
292:
271:
251:
246:
225:
204:
200:Featured on
197:
138:Richard Marx
133:
48:
43:
31:
28:
353:notability
437:Itsmyright
255:Itsmyright
177:incomplete
491:Athaenara
450:is not a
444:Jeremy706
422:Athaenara
384:Jeremy706
370:Athaenara
211:Athaenara
394:contribs
364:format (
362:cite web
351:verified
202:CBS News
150:WP:Music
126:View log
452:dispute
433:Comment
272:Comment
252:keeper.
226:Comment
181:DumbBOT
93:protect
88:history
420:). —
355:as per
349:which
134:Delete
121:delete
97:delete
368:). —
247:Keep.
198:Keep.
124:) – (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
460:talk
447:talk
442:and
440:talk
418:diff
401:AfDM
388:talk
366:diff
320:e.g.
310:n.b.
280:talk
259:talk
234:talk
185:talk
163:talk
146:RIAA
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
57:talk
411:Adw
494:✉
485:)
462:)
425:✉
414:}}
408:{{
404:}}
398:{{
373:✉
339:}}
333:{{
282:)
261:)
236:)
214:✉
187:)
165:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
59:)
481:(
458:(
416:(
391:·
386:(
278:(
257:(
232:(
183:(
161:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.