201:
Non-notable law firm written like an advertisement. All the coverage seems to be about its founder, with none of the coverage existing going in-depth about the firm. Notability is not inherited, and this firm fails
170:
253:
405:
I might have considered them notable had they been lead counsel on the Google case, but they weren't. They didn;t appear in court, but were one of the firms that helped write the brief.
164:
227:
341:
The award that you link to doesn't appear to be enough to confer notability, and the sources combined don't seem to give the level of coverage that we would want under
299:
382:
364:-- promo page on an unremarkable law firm. "Boutique" strongly suggests "non-notable", while the content can be just as effectively housed on the firm's web site.
123:
428:
279:
130:
96:
91:
100:
319:
I disagree that "all the coverage" is "about the founder." Most of the cited references report on the firm in general--for instance,
83:
185:
17:
152:
327:. Also, I would be glad to revise the language if you have suggestions on how to make it less "like an advertisement."
307:
287:
324:
146:
500:
430:. The district court's decision was later affirmed on appeal by the Second Circuit (in the opinion you link to).
40:
481:
458:
439:
419:
394:
373:
354:
336:
311:
291:
271:
245:
219:
64:
142:
320:
87:
425:
350:
303:
283:
264:
238:
215:
496:
390:
369:
192:
36:
79:
71:
406:
178:
435:
346:
332:
259:
233:
211:
158:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
495:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
454:
386:
365:
449:
as non-notable. The only apparent dissent is a lawyer; could they be in the firm as well?
342:
471:
467:
415:
207:
203:
431:
328:
53:
117:
325:
https://www.law360.com/articles/703653/6-ip-boutiques-punching-above-their-weight
450:
410:
321:
https://www.law360.com/articles/610238/ip-group-of-the-year-durie-tangri
489:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
470:. The advertising aspect of the article should also be noted.
254:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
503:). No further edits should be made to this page.
228:list of California-related deletion discussions
424:They were lead counsel in the district court.
300:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
383:list of Business-related deletion discussions
191:
8:
381:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:Note: This debate has been included in the
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:Note: This debate has been included in the
226:Note: This debate has been included in the
408:. Otherwise this is just an advertisement.
380:
297:
277:
251:
225:
280:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
520:
492:Please do not modify it.
482:11:57, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
459:18:27, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
65:14:35, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
440:18:18, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
420:08:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
395:04:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
374:04:52, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
355:23:35, 3 May 2017 (UTC)
337:04:04, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
312:02:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
292:02:52, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
272:23:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
246:23:56, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
220:23:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
397:
314:
304:Shawn in Montreal
294:
284:Shawn in Montreal
274:
248:
511:
494:
478:
475:
269:
267:
262:
243:
241:
236:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
80:Durie Tangri LLP
72:Durie Tangri LLP
61:
57:
34:
519:
518:
514:
513:
512:
510:
509:
508:
507:
501:deletion review
490:
476:
473:
466:as not passing
265:
260:
258:
239:
234:
232:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
59:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
517:
515:
506:
505:
485:
484:
461:
444:
443:
442:
399:
398:
377:
376:
359:
358:
357:
316:
315:
295:
275:
249:
199:
198:
135:
74:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
516:
504:
502:
498:
493:
487:
486:
483:
480:
479:
469:
465:
462:
460:
456:
452:
448:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
427:(see p. 29),
426:
423:
422:
421:
417:
413:
412:
407:
404:
401:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
379:
378:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
339:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
273:
270:
268:
263:
255:
250:
247:
244:
242:
237:
229:
224:
223:
222:
221:
217:
213:
209:
205:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
66:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
491:
488:
472:
463:
446:
409:
402:
361:
347:TonyBallioni
261:CAPTAIN RAJU
257:
235:CAPTAIN RAJU
231:
212:TonyBallioni
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
63:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
387:K.e.coffman
366:K.e.coffman
165:free images
497:talk page
37:talk page
499:or in a
124:View log
39:or in a
432:Morninj
403:Delete.
343:WP:NORG
329:Morninj
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
468:WP:GNG
464:Delete
451:Ifnord
447:Delete
362:Delete
208:WP:ORG
204:WP:GNG
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
416:talk
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
60:Train
16:<
477:5969
474:Onel
455:talk
436:talk
391:talk
370:talk
351:talk
333:talk
323:and
308:talk
288:talk
216:talk
206:and
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
411:DGG
266:(✉)
240:(✉)
193:TWL
122:– (
457:)
438:)
418:)
393:)
385:.
372:)
353:)
345:.
335:)
310:)
302:.
290:)
282:.
256:.
230:.
218:)
210:.
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
52:.
453:(
434:(
414:(
389:(
368:(
349:(
331:(
306:(
286:(
214:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
56:A
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.