225:-- which there isn't, because apart from one routine casting announcement of the type that any actor could always show for any role, all of the other valid sources are "local boy shoots for the big time" pieces from his hometown local media. This is not enough sourcing to get an actor over NACTOR or GNG, and due to the potential for a Knowledge (XXG) article to cause
373:
be able to add "award-winning" or "award-nominated" to their PR bumf since a child actor getting an Oscar or Emmy or CSA nomination is rare. That's what I'm talking about: the question of whether an award is notable enough to make its winners or nominees notable for the honour is a question of whether the presentation of that award gets covered by the media as
372:
Awards on the level of the Oscars or the Emmys or the CSAs, photo opportunities or not, are organized and recognized by the industry at large, and garner actual media coverage. The "Joey Awards" are organized by one woman and garner no media coverage at all, and exist primarily to help child actors
364:
In addition to co-lead on The
Returned, Kingwell has key role as leads brother on ABCs The Good Doctor which has been confirmed for a second season following viewing figures of 16.9m for the season 1 premiere. Kingwell will also be featuring more prominently in the second season of A Series of
229:, we have a standing practice of being especially vigilant about the notability of minors. No prejudice against recreation in the future if and when there's a stronger claim of notability and better sourcing, but nothing here is enough to pass Knowledge (XXG)'s notability standards yet.
365:
Unfortunate Events as the TV series reflects the novels. Also, ALL award ceremonies are PR stunts, any reader of the article will be able to form an opinion as to the prestige of the Joey Awards by virtue of the name recognition.
170:
216:
major roles, not just one, before NACTOR is passed just for having had roles. And the award nomination criterion is not passed by the "Joey Awards", which are a non-notable PR stunt for young actors and
246:
312:
221:
a top-level acting award on the order of the Oscars or the Emmys or the
Canadian Screen Awards. So the only criterion we can evaluate this is whether there's enough media coverage to pass
123:
279:
204:
of a child actor, known mainly for guest roles rather than major ones. Every actor who exists does not automatically get a
Knowledge (XXG) article -- he must actually pass an
164:
492:
130:
398:
unless we have compelling evidence for notability, we should not have articles on people under age 18. The evidence here is in no way compelling.
96:
91:
17:
434:
100:
61:
83:
377:
or not. Oscars/Emmys/CSAs yes, because the media coverage is there — Joey Awards no, because the media coverage isn't there.
185:
152:
209:
416:
208:
criterion for an article to become earned. The only role here that is "major" enough to count toward NACTOR, however, is
476:
40:
493:
http://deadline.com/2017/09/the-good-doctor-premiere-live3-ratings-young-sheldon-big-bang-theory-the-brave-1202179902/
403:
146:
430:
57:
457:
448:-- Agree, we should not have articles on minors as there is no compelling reason to do so in this case. --
438:
407:
386:
357:
337:
304:
271:
238:
142:
65:
472:
36:
192:
399:
453:
353:
332:
299:
266:
178:
87:
205:
426:
53:
382:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
471:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
158:
222:
201:
449:
349:
316:
283:
250:
79:
71:
378:
230:
117:
348:
Had found sources and have added them. But does pay to have a look :) --
465:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
419:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
247:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
113:
109:
105:
177:
313:
list of
British Columbia-related deletion discussions
425:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
479:). No further edits should be made to this page.
280:list of Television-related deletion discussions
8:
311:Note: This debate has been included in the
278:Note: This debate has been included in the
245:Note: This debate has been included in the
310:
277:
244:
485:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
210:The Returned (U.S. TV series)
458:19:14, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
439:18:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
408:04:03, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
387:17:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
358:08:39, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
338:21:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
305:21:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
272:21:34, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
239:21:33, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
66:16:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
511:
468:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
212:-- but we require
441:
400:John Pack Lambert
340:
329:
307:
296:
274:
263:
502:
495:
490:
470:
424:
422:
420:
335:
330:
323:
302:
297:
290:
269:
264:
257:
196:
195:
181:
133:
121:
103:
34:
510:
509:
505:
504:
503:
501:
500:
499:
498:
491:
487:
483:
477:deletion review
466:
442:
415:
413:
333:
322:
317:
300:
289:
284:
267:
256:
251:
138:
129:
94:
78:
75:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
508:
506:
497:
496:
484:
482:
481:
461:
460:
423:
412:
411:
410:
392:
391:
390:
389:
367:
366:
361:
360:
342:
341:
318:
308:
285:
275:
252:
199:
198:
135:
80:Dylan Kingwell
74:
72:Dylan Kingwell
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
507:
494:
489:
486:
480:
478:
474:
469:
463:
462:
459:
455:
451:
447:
444:
443:
440:
436:
435:contributions
432:
428:
427:Jo-Jo Eumerus
421:
418:
409:
405:
401:
397:
394:
393:
388:
384:
380:
376:
371:
370:
369:
368:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
343:
339:
336:
331:
328:
327:
321:
314:
309:
306:
303:
298:
295:
294:
288:
281:
276:
273:
270:
265:
262:
261:
255:
248:
243:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
211:
207:
203:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
132:
128:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
62:contributions
59:
55:
54:Jo-Jo Eumerus
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
488:
467:
464:
445:
414:
395:
374:
345:
325:
324:
319:
292:
291:
286:
259:
258:
253:
226:
218:
213:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
126:
49:
47:
31:
28:
165:free images
473:talk page
450:EC Racing
350:TheDomain
206:WP:NACTOR
37:talk page
475:or in a
417:Relisted
326:assiveYR
293:assiveYR
260:assiveYR
214:multiple
124:View log
39:or in a
379:Bearcat
231:Bearcat
171:WP refs
159:scholar
97:protect
92:history
446:Delete
396:Delete
346:Unsure
223:WP:GNG
202:WP:BLP
143:Google
101:delete
50:delete
186:JSTOR
147:books
131:Stats
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
454:talk
431:talk
404:talk
383:talk
375:news
354:talk
235:talk
227:harm
179:FENS
153:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
58:talk
219:not
193:TWL
122:– (
456:)
437:)
433:,
406:)
385:)
356:)
315:.
282:.
249:.
237:)
173:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
64:)
60:,
52:.
452:(
429:(
402:(
381:(
352:(
334:♠
320:M
301:♠
287:M
268:♠
254:M
233:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
127:·
120:)
82:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.