Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/E3value - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

176:
neutral and clear, in the Knowledge (XXG) syntax. E3value is becoming more and more important in business modeling, it is not part of any companies, and the tool to develop it is free to use. I really think it has a place in Knowledge (XXG). Please explain why you consider not before deleting it. I understand the miss of references and I'll add external references right now.
280:. Hey everybody, I've added a graphical example (important for a graphical mod language :-) ) and independant sources. I am still waiting for further improvements depending of your comments. Of course, the english is probably not perfect (french use to have a bad english): I hope the community can correct the remaining syntax mistakes. 231:
Hey people: I've tried to change a bit the synthax so that it suits the wikipedia way of thinking. Probably it is not enough but tell me what I should change next. I'll also want to add a graphical example, but I'm still not allowed to upload a picture. For the word salad, I've no schizophrenia, I'm
128:
This article has been speedily deleted twice to my knowledge. The phraseology seems to be selling the article. I'd personally think that a radical rewrite if the modelling language itself is notable rather than a delete, but as this has been deleted as advertising before I though a discussion rather
175:
Hello, I'm the author of this article and I agree that I'm a beginner in Knowledge (XXG) rules: the first version of my article was not neutral, as if I have nothing to do with e3value, it is just a subject of study for one of my courses. I've rewrited this article and now I really think it is
121: 205:, through process to establish a precendent. Entirely no notability shown for this non-consumer "ebusiness" product, and the article is rife with advertising style 17: 295: 247: 191: 315: 36: 88: 83: 92: 314:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
75: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
266: 283: 235: 179: 134: 130: 299: 287: 270: 251: 239: 218: 195: 183: 164: 148: 138: 79: 57: 291: 243: 187: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
71: 63: 214: 160: 151:
issue here. Also, the article has no independent references to demonstrate notability per
53: 152: 109: 262: 210: 206: 156: 147:
The article reads, to a substantial degree, like an ad, so there is a serious
49: 308:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116: 105: 101: 97: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 318:). No further edits should be made to this page. 129:than another speedy delete would be preferable. 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 335: 261:. No independent sources. 311:Please do not modify it. 300:14:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC) 271:18:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 252:15:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 219:14:46, 14 May 2008 (UTC) 196:15:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 165:15:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 139:15:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC) 58:10:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 44:The result was 302: 286:comment added by 254: 238:comment added by 232:just french :-) 198: 182:comment added by 326: 313: 281: 233: 177: 170:Give me time :-) 119: 113: 95: 34: 334: 333: 329: 328: 327: 325: 324: 323: 322: 316:deletion review 309: 211:Smerdis of Tlön 115: 86: 70: 67: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 332: 330: 321: 320: 304: 303: 274: 273: 229: 228: 222: 221: 173: 172: 167: 126: 125: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 331: 319: 317: 312: 306: 305: 301: 297: 293: 289: 285: 279: 276: 275: 272: 268: 264: 260: 257: 256: 255: 253: 249: 245: 241: 237: 227: 224: 223: 220: 216: 212: 208: 204: 201: 200: 199: 197: 193: 189: 185: 181: 171: 168: 166: 162: 158: 154: 150: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 132: 123: 118: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 310: 307: 277: 258: 230: 226:Some changes 225: 202: 174: 169: 144: 127: 45: 43: 31: 28: 282:—Preceding 234:—Preceding 178:—Preceding 131:Drivenapart 207:word salad 149:WP:ADVERT 296:contribs 284:unsigned 248:contribs 236:unsigned 192:contribs 180:unsigned 122:View log 288:Pipo489 278:Changes 240:Pipo489 184:Pipo489 145:Delete. 89:protect 84:history 72:E3value 64:E3value 263:Stifle 259:Delete 203:Delete 117:delete 93:delete 46:Delete 157:Nsk92 120:) – ( 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 292:talk 267:talk 244:talk 215:talk 209:. - 188:talk 161:talk 153:WP:N 135:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 50:Fram 298:) 294:• 269:) 250:) 246:• 217:) 194:) 190:• 163:) 155:. 137:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 48:. 290:( 265:( 242:( 213:( 186:( 159:( 133:( 124:) 114:( 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Fram
talk
10:18, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
E3value
E3value
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Drivenapart
talk
15:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
WP:ADVERT
WP:N
Nsk92
talk
15:55, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
unsigned
Pipo489
talk
contribs

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑