220:-- all they do is announce the product, and talk about it's premise. Considering the lack of coverage beyond it's announcement, and the fact that it is continually delayed, with most follow-up info being from the company's website itself, makes me think it should be deleted, or merged/redirected to the original
750:
Four of twelve references are from the product homepage. Two are press releases from press release sites (prlog/eworldwire). The gizmag and digitaltrends references are essentially blog entries that restate the press release from 2011. The only reliable sources are perhaps from The
Anniston Star and
197:
The product in question does not meet GNG. The GNG notice has been in place for months, the article consists of primary sources or press releases (6 of 9 sources cited), one joystiq article, and an article in the anniston star (local paper). If it were simply vaporware, I'd be interested in inclusion
275:
What I'm getting at is, in it's current shape, I don't believe it's currently notable, and the more it gets delayed without explanation or future dates, the more likely I feel that it won't be released, and if it's never released, then I don't see it ever getting future coverage to help it meet the
668:
I didn't think you were trying to "start anything", I was just confirming that you knew what you were saying. (It's not very often someone makes an invalid argument, and then admits that they're self-aware in making an invalid argument, without arguing the point further.) Thank you for clarifying,
548:
a useable source, but it's just like the one's I brought up before, where all it really is, is a short article outlining it's premise, sourced by a press release. Because every source is like this, is why I think a merge could be a good choice; there's so little of substance to be said about this
525:
Here I am just scrolling trough VG article and I found this,well anyway It proves to be stable,12 sources an a website is good,I have seen articles with less, that haven't been deleted or merged,although those might seem like the right choice right now,I have no intentions of a search for another
503:
That Ghit is mostly non-envizions-related. Millions of results based on mostly irrelevant results being displayed. EVO 2 is a guitar pickup, 4x4 EVO 2, HTC EVO 2... I mean, of the first Google page, only four out of the first eighteen results is actually relevant, of which the Wiki entry is one.
328:, or don't cover much beyond it's initial announcement. To call it "detailed" is a stretch as well, the article is largely tech specs ripped from the official website or countless delays or "absence of news" type updates observed by editors. (Empty statements like
166:
751:
Joystiq, but the articles are over a year and a half old, and aside from being the same, generic types of press release material, do not do anything to further the notability of the wikipedia article. -
657:
I'M NOT TRYING TO START ANYTHING,I'm agreeing to disagreeing,but yeah I guess I'm discrediting my own argument,but It seems to be a nice article and I wouldn't care if it were deleted or merged :/.
549:
topic. The rest of your comment I can't really respond to, as I can't really understand what you're getting at with all those typos and run-on thoughts, but I feel like it may fall under
119:
375:
52:. As is standard practice, arguments with a strong basis in Knowledge policy are given greater weight. Any content worth merging may be pulled from the article history.
407:
160:
303:- clearly has enough sources to support the info. Also has two images and a logo, a detailed infobox, and otherwise a detailed article. Should be kept. --
395:
261:? Just because it's being delayed does not mean it has to be deleted. Delaying of a product does not cause anything for its respective wiki article! --
658:
616:
582:
531:
527:
126:
198:
and to have the article marked as such, but the issue is there is little reason at this juncture to even have the article exist.
466:. It even has more sources than the "original evo console" as Sergecross73 pointed out, and that isn't showing up at an AfD...
17:
308:
266:
425:
768:
The account
CamillePontalec appears to be a single purpose account, having never made any contributions before this. -
485:
To be clear, the only thing I really said about the original EVO was that it would be a good merge/redirect target...
611:
No I was agreeing,Other than finding more source on the last page of searching,like I said,Yeah it could fall under
181:
736:
Ample refrences and an article which is more than a stub only. Whoever is in gaming will find this article useful.
612:
578:
550:
148:
820:
741:
92:
87:
40:
217:
304:
262:
96:
662:
620:
586:
535:
413:
401:
794:
675:
647:
601:
559:
491:
342:
282:
230:
79:
816:
717:
36:
142:
737:
57:
528:
http://www.engadget.com/2011/05/25/evo-2-console-promises-to-bring-android-gaming-to-your-tv-this-f/
785:
468:
174:
324:. The sources at the article are largely first party (doesn't count toward notability standards),
138:
799:
777:
760:
745:
724:
680:
652:
624:
606:
590:
564:
539:
513:
496:
476:
447:
387:
364:
347:
312:
287:
270:
253:
235:
207:
61:
789:
670:
642:
596:
554:
486:
443:
383:
337:
277:
225:
221:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
815:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
188:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
773:
756:
704:
509:
360:
249:
203:
320:- Whether or not it has images or an infobox has no bearing on whether or not it meets the
53:
325:
321:
669:
now the closing admin can see that your !vote is more of a "neutral" than anything.
595:
So are you acknowledging you gave a mostly invalid reason for keeping the article?
439:
419:
379:
154:
113:
769:
752:
505:
463:
356:
245:
199:
83:
707:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
244:
I'm not opposed to redirect/merge if there is no consensus for deletion. -
526:
source as Kai states above is almost the same I found with Yahoo unless "
459:
331:
75:
67:
334:
in June, as stated on their site, however it did not appear there
809:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:, I think there are plenty of reliable sources out there
216:- There are sources out there, but they're all like this
432:
109:
105:
101:
173:
714:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
553:, an invalid reasoning for keeping at article...
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
823:). No further edits should be made to this page.
355:Gaming & Computing is the article creator. -
633:falls under OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, that's basically
396:list of video game-related deletion discussions
376:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
637:. If you're trying to argue a point, that's
374:Note: This debate has been included in the
394:Note: This debate has been included in the
259:and the fact that it is continually delayed
373:
629:Just to be clear, when you say that your
330:The EVO 2 was supposed to be featured at
424:
462:. The console is fairly notable; meets
7:
430:
24:
641:an argument you want to make...
788:isn't a valid argument either.
418:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
635:discrediting your own argument
254:04:53, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
236:04:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
208:01:38, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
412:
406:
62:18:20, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
800:03:31, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
778:00:47, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
761:00:45, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
746:14:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
725:07:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
681:20:58, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
653:20:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
625:17:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
607:16:56, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
591:16:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
565:15:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
540:15:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
514:01:09, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
497:01:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
477:00:54, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
448:18:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
400:
388:18:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
365:01:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
348:19:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
313:17:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
288:19:22, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
271:17:52, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
840:
577:Yeah it could fall under
812:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
766:Note to closing admin:
326:not exactly reliable
305:Gaming&Computing
263:Gaming&Computing
613:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
579:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
551:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
48:The result was
727:
450:
390:
224:article for now.
222:EVO Smart Console
831:
814:
797:
792:
720:
719:Mr. Stradivarius
713:
709:
678:
673:
650:
645:
604:
599:
562:
557:
494:
489:
475:
473:
437:
436:
435:
428:
422:
416:
410:
404:
393:
345:
340:
285:
280:
233:
228:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
839:
838:
834:
833:
832:
830:
829:
828:
827:
821:deletion review
810:
795:
790:
738:CamillePontalec
718:
702:
676:
671:
648:
643:
602:
597:
560:
555:
492:
487:
469:
467:
431:
399:
343:
338:
283:
278:
231:
226:
214:Delete or Merge
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
837:
835:
826:
825:
805:
804:
803:
802:
780:
763:
730:
729:
728:
711:
710:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
659:74.178.177.115
617:74.178.177.115
583:74.178.177.115
570:
569:
568:
567:
532:74.178.177.115
519:
518:
517:
516:
500:
499:
480:
479:
471:Cyan Gardevoir
452:
451:
391:
370:
369:
368:
367:
350:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
239:
238:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
836:
824:
822:
818:
813:
807:
806:
801:
798:
793:
787:
784:
781:
779:
775:
771:
767:
764:
762:
758:
754:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
735:
732:
731:
726:
723:
722:
721:
712:
708:
706:
701:
700:
682:
679:
674:
667:
666:
664:
660:
656:
655:
654:
651:
646:
640:
636:
632:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
609:
608:
605:
600:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
566:
563:
558:
552:
547:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
524:
521:
520:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
498:
495:
490:
484:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
472:
465:
461:
460:as this shows
457:
454:
453:
449:
445:
441:
434:
427:
421:
415:
409:
403:
397:
392:
389:
385:
381:
377:
372:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
349:
346:
341:
335:
333:
327:
323:
319:
316:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
289:
286:
281:
274:
273:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
234:
229:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
811:
808:
791:Sergecross73
786:WP:ITSUSEFUL
782:
765:
733:
716:
715:
703:
672:Sergecross73
644:Sergecross73
638:
634:
631:own argument
630:
598:Sergecross73
556:Sergecross73
545:
522:
488:Sergecross73
470:
455:
352:
339:Sergecross73
329:
317:
300:
279:Sergecross73
258:
227:Sergecross73
213:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
218:IGN article
161:free images
54:Beeblebrox
817:talk page
530:" counts.
456:Weak Keep
37:talk page
819:or in a
705:Relisted
523:Neutral:
120:View log
50:redirect
39:or in a
783:Comment
440:Frankie
380:Frankie
332:E3 2012
318:Comment
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
796:msg me
770:Kai445
753:Kai445
677:msg me
649:msg me
603:msg me
561:msg me
506:Kai445
493:msg me
357:Kai445
344:msg me
322:WP:GNG
284:msg me
246:Kai445
232:msg me
200:Kai445
139:Google
97:delete
544:That
438:). —
353:Note:
276:GNG.
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
76:EVO 2
68:EVO 2
16:<
774:talk
757:talk
742:talk
734:Keep
663:talk
621:talk
587:talk
536:talk
510:talk
464:WP:N
444:talk
433:Talk
384:talk
378:. —
361:talk
309:talk
301:Keep
267:talk
250:talk
204:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
639:not
336:.)
189:TWL
118:– (
776:)
759:)
744:)
665:)
623:)
589:)
546:is
538:)
512:)
446:)
426:RS
386:)
363:)
311:)
269:)
252:)
206:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
772:(
755:(
740:(
661:(
619:(
615:.
585:(
581:.
534:(
508:(
504:-
442:(
429:·
423:·
420:S
417:·
414:B
411:·
408:N
405:·
402:G
398:(
382:(
359:(
307:(
265:(
248:(
202:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.